100% Agree!
Meta
Categories
Recent Comments
- Markus Heisler on Contact Your Senators in Opposition to David Chipman as ATF Director
- Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 264: The Other Gutenberg’s Book Was Better | Weer'd World on Gunblog Variety Cast Ep 170
- Randy on Bug A Salt and Terminal Ballistics
- Assorted Calibers Podcast Ep 261: Is This a Dagger I See Before Me? | Weer'd World on Gunblog Variety Cast EP 145
- Weerd Beard on Lucky Gunner and The Pending Lawsuit Funds
-
I might agree, but I couldn’t stand more than 60 seconds of the choppy editting.
Where’d I put the Tylenol?
Chaplain Tim
That editing style is all the rage with the younger youtube videographers. Its not my favorite thing in the world…tho it does give a certain energy to what is just a talking head.
There is no legislative solution to this problem because the media is protected by the first amendment. Government isn’t always the answer, and the second amendment is not the only one that has dangers associated with it. The mindset of hundreds of millions of people is not going to change, but the media corporations can collectively decide to set a policy on how they cover these types of events. Just leave the name and face out of the coverage. One could lead by example, and the others may follow suit. Social media is another beast. I can’t see the spread being stopped short term.
Like the drunk guys who run onto the baseball field, the media decided to not give them what they want.