Two videos that dovetail very well.
First this one:
The term “Assault Weapon” is a completely made-up term. It combines “Assault” and “Weapon” which gives it a sinister tone for the sole purpose of making people WANT to take action against them, and to vilify people who make a rational argument against the stupidity. Still rifles and handguns that were previously defined as such may neither be weapons, nor used to assault. And as he points out weapons used to assault may not be considered “Assault Weapons”. What’s even worse is even here in Massachusetts where “Assault Weapons” are defined by law, I still don’t know what people are talking about when they use the term, because there about about a dozen new bills that will CHANGE the definition from what it means here.
Why? Well so we can float this crap:
Did you see how he conflated Bushmaster’s semi-auto rifles with the full-auto rifles he used in the military? The same items that mere civilians can’t own unless they’re pre-86, we go through a ton of paperwork, pay a tax, get registered, and pay the market price which is close to the price of a damn CAR!
They’re trying it again, getting guns banned because of scary words and intentional confusion!