Anti-Freedom, NOT Anti-Gun

Of course we know that anti-rights activists view the 2nd Amendment with nothing but spite, and would repeal it if they could. Given that they can’t, they just push laws that violate that.

Sebastian and Miguel talk about CSGV’s active hostility to George Zimmerman receiving a fair trial by a jury of his peers. Why, because he’s a lawful gun owner, and they hate him. Further the new evidence presented again all agrees with the story we heard on day one from Sanford Police. Zimmerman took a documented beating that night, and all evidence points that Martin was doing all of the beating. Overall I’m standing clear until all the evidence is released at the trial (specifically Martin’s blood toxicology, which is the one piece of evidence that would explain why things went down the way they are claimed by Zimmerman…ie that Martin ran off, and then doubled back and ambushed Zimmerman) It appears that every piece of concrete evidence agrees with Zimmerman’s story. The “Evidence” for Martin’s side all seems to be hearsay, or even pure fiction. Certainly all I’ve seen points out that Sanford had no reason to Arrest Zimmerman, and his later arrest and trumped-up charges were all at the bidding of the racist, violent mobs. There WILL be riots nation-wide, I suspect, and Zimmerman will likely get murdered by “Street Justice”, so arm up and be ready.

Here’s another great anti-freedom example from Joan Peterson:

.60-plus guns going back to 3 members of Hutaree militia http://on.freep.com/IXgC0f via @freep- more dangerous people with dangerous weapons

Ummm, from the story:

Now that they’ve been vindicated, three Hutaree militia defendants are getting their guns and ammunition back.

The court concluded that they are entitled to get their 60-plus guns back, along with hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammunition…”Since they didn’t engage in criminal activity, their lawfully maintained weapons and ammunition should be returned. The government has no basis to keep law-abiding citizens from exercising their Second Amendment rights.”

Of course Ms. Peterson and her Brady Campaign, and Joyce Foundation masters see ZERO need of INNOCENT people getting their property back. You see they see no reason for lawful people from owning guns. (Well except for whatever they consider “legitimate guns”….but I suspect Joan would toss her own Husband’s hunting rifles under the bus if she could)

These people are Anti-Freedom, and guns are just a small part of that. They will ban whatever they feel they can, and they will eliminate ANY freedoms they can. They do NOT believe in human rights! They do NOT believe in due process! They do not believe in laws or justice!

What they WANT is to control people. And the term “Useful Idiots” was coined because people like Joan Peterson, and Dan Gross, and Ladd Everett, and Jason Kilgore, and every other person pushing a “Progressive” agenda feel that once human rights are removed, only the people they perceive as “Other” will be harmed, and they will survive. Of course they will be the FIRST to be destroyed.

All you need to do is look at any Socialist State. The teachings of Marx, and the uprisings by his students were NEVER about altruism. It was ALWAYS about piracy and looting of the “Others”, and the “Others” were NEVER the people listening to speeches or fighting for the cause.

Just look at this whole 99% vs. the 1% of the Kill the Jews Movement. Do you think the people who were starved by Stalin or Mao, or put into death camps by Pol Pot or Hitler, or even the people who were killed by sub-standard hospitals in the UK Socialist Healthcare system thought they were the people who would feel the knife of the revolution?

They ALL thought it would be green pastures and the Big Rock Candy Mountain, while the object of their spite (be it the “Rich” or the “Educated”, or “Jews and Gypsies” etc) would suffer their fate.

Beware!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics | 14 Comments

Quote of the Day

From Ambulance Driver.

It isn’t a “line of work” for me. It’s who I am. Don’t want me interfering in your decision to off yourself? Fine. Don’t. Get. Me. Involved.

It’s that simple. My number is 911. Don’t call it, or don’t make spiteful threats that spur other people to call it. Just get on with your business, preferably alone and in private.

Some people are taking offense on a Libertarian level for the instances where AD legally (and I’d say morally) can’t take “No” for an answer.

He’s made similar remarks about giving Jehova’s Witnesses blood transfusions. Its a mortal sin for them to “Consume Blood”, but in many instances not administering blood products means they die right there, which to Kelly (and myself) is also a “Mortal Sin” (quotes because I don’t actually ascribe to Mortal Sin on the religious level, and I never really took the time to talk faith with Kelly when we hang out…we’re generally too busy talking medicine, politics, funny stories, and guns. I do believe there are certain things that would haunt me for the rest of my natural life, such as letting somebody die that I KNEW I could have saved. Hell I’m still haunted by the suicide of a friend who I hadn’t talked to for months before she died. I doubt I could have “Saved her”, but I will always wonder what might have happened if I could have had a hand in her life at that moment in time)

Again, you want to get your full-wookie on, don’t involve others.

This is also why there are so few Libertarians in big cities. You just can’t be a REAL Libertarian in a dense urban environment because privacy and self-sufficiency only exists in the most tenuous sense. If you listen to music when you come home from the bar at 2am, you stand a good chance of waking a neighbor up. When you throw out your trash, you depend on somebody to haul it off for you, when you take a crap it gets flushed into the public sewers. Even in the suburbs, the classic car you’re restoring in your back yard, or how often you paint your house, or mow your lawn impacts the value of the other houses on the street.

I still admire the philosophy, but also I see that it simply cant be unlimited. In the case of the man threatening suicide, he was the proverbial man who decided to swing his arms near AD’s head.

Sorry, bub, you decided to get others involved in your personal choices, its on them too.

Posted in Biology, Politics | 32 Comments

Good Save, Barry!

video platform
video management
video solutions
video player

He gets called on the carpet for his claim of accountability on the economy he made when he was first elected. His answer? Well he needs just a little more time.

This is why I fear Obama less than Romney as President. He’s a staller. He’s a guy who votes “Present”, he’s a guy who goes on vacations. He’s a guy who can’t be be bothered to draft budgets, or propose legislation.

Romney is a guy who passes bills, and gets things done. Do we really want that?

Posted in Politics | 3 Comments

“Gun Death” The Cell

This story has been around the blogs, but its worth a mention here.

Daniel Chong, the UC San Diego student who was left in a Drug Enforcement Administration holding cell for nearly five days, said the time spent there was a life-altering experience. On Wednesday, the DEA apologized for the incident….Chong said he was at a friend’s house in University City celebrating 4/20, a day many marijuana users set aside to smoke, when agents came inside and raided the residence. Chong was then taken to the DEA office in Kearny Mesa.

He said agents questioned him, and then told him he could go home. One agent even offered him a ride, Chong said. No criminal charges were filed against him.

But Chong did not go home that night. Instead, he was placed in a cell for five days without any human contact and was not given food or drink. In his desperation, he said he was forced to drink his own urine.

He even attempted to kill himself with the glass of his glasses. All for smoking some weed! Further yet another reason why citizens don’t need guns, because the Police will protect you!

Hey, but if he died, it wouldn’t be a “Gun Death”, or a “Gun Suicide”, so it wouldn’t have counted!

Posted in Gun Death? | 2 Comments

Another Great Youtube Channel

This guy makes REALLY neat videos. He has a fancy-pants air-rifle and uses it to dispatch various pest species. His earlier videos are just “Scope Cam” shots. Now he’s working a LOT more on composition.

Very neat when you think of how much wind drift and bullet drop happens with an air rifle pellet!

Posted in Biology, Guns | Leave a comment

Afternoon LOL

The Onion Brings the LOLz

Posted in Politics, Random | Leave a comment

Ungh

Woke up this morning feeling like Holy Hell.

Gonna sit this one out.

Posted in Biology | 3 Comments

“Gun Death” Stabbing

So simple, knives are everywhere, violent criminals are, thankfully, less common. Where the two intersect

One person is dead and another arrested after a stabbing in Minneapolis.

The stabbing happened around 10:30 p.m. Monday night on the 500 block of Cedar Avenue South. When police arrived, they found a man with stab wounds. He died at the scene.

Officers arrested a man near the scene of the stabbing and are investigating the circumstances of the crime.

No “Gun Death”, so no big deal right?

h/t Maddmedic

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

The Mechanics of Stupidity

One key feature of most people who are total idiots is despite all outward evidence they view their mental stature as “above average” at worst, and “exceptional” at the most. Chris Mathews is one of those people who really don’t have a lot of equipment in the ‘ol attic, but find themselves BLINDINGLY intelligent.

Hotair ties it all together with this quote.

This from a man who on October 2, 2008, shortly before that evening’s Vice Presidential debate, said of Palin:

“Is this [vice presidential debate] about her brain power?… Do you think cute will beat brains?…Do you think she’d do better on the questions on Jeopardy! or the interview they do during a half-time?…My suspicion is that she has the same lack of intellectual curiosity that the President of the United States has right now and that is scary!”

Then on January 12, 2010:

They find these empty vessels who know nothing about the world! Nothing about foreign policy! Who immediately begin to spout the neo-con line. I read her book — it’s full of that crap….It’s unbelievable how little this woman knows!…Don’t put her on Jeopardy!”

And again on November 2, 2010:

“Senator, do you think Sarah Palin is qualified to be President of the United States?…If she were on Jeopardy! right now and the topic was national government, American government generally defined, would she look like an imbecile, or would she look okay? Does she know anything?”

And finally on January 19, 2011:

“I’d like to see her on just a couple of episodes of Celebrity Jeopardy! or It’s Academic Mac McGarry to just see if she knows anything.”

Heh, that would hurt if he wasn’t so divorced from reality. He’s probably either patting himself on the back pointing out that those dumbed-down questions were “really hard ones”, or more likely telling himself he was the winner.

Posted in Podcast, Random | 5 Comments

Pro-Criminal: Double Down

So this post is getting a LOT of eyes, and I suspect myself, and others looking at the post in question are diving a lot of traffic that the anti-rights “Kid Shooting” blog never sees, so this post seems to be the only one with any real comments. Many might say that driving traffic to the antis is bad, but in this case it seems to have shaken the trees and got this great double-down from Jason Kilgore of the Joyce Foundation.

It was a justified shooting. Every life is precious, but clearly the driver was within his rights. It’s just a shame that the boy was able to access a gun for this attempt and didn’t have the values necessary to avoid it.

Again the keystone of the anti-rights attack on lawful people: “Gun Availability”. You see the gun laws only assault the lawful. We argue that the criminal element doesn’t abide by the laws on the books, but the laws of society. As we know from the more heavily prohibited illegal drugs, ANYBODY can get Cocaine within a few hours if they know the right phone number to call. If you can get coke or crack which is 100% illegal, you can probably get a gun just as easily.

The anti-rights people note that the guns in this country start out as LEGAL guns, and then fall into the hands of criminals. So their solution is to restrict legal guns more.

Of course we know how well that works for drugs…

But Mr. Kilgore seems to miss the big point of this:

SOMEBODY was going to die in this incident. The 13 year old criminal had a loaded gun and was going to do some harm. The man in the car offered his defensive rebuttal with a loaded gun of his own.

Gun availability was how the criminal got his gun…but it was also gun availability was how the innocent man defended himself!

Now Mr. Kilgore thinks he can take the gun away from both. OK first that’s a fallacy, just look at the above prohibition of cocaine, but let’s pretend his fantasy can be made fact. He feels that he can take the gun away from both people, and would have stopped this violent encounter from happening completely.

That’s why I do “Gun Death?” stories. Even if you can take the gun away from both people, is Jason saying that the 13 year old criminal wouldn’t pick up a knife, or a hammer, or a masonry brick, and commit the same violent crime?

But in his fantasy world (which simply doesn’t exist anywhere in the world) the innocent man now is unarmed! Further, do you think, even at 13, this was the thug’s first trip to the Rodeo? Do you not think this little gem hasn’t been in a fight before? Hasn’t learned how to beat another man to death with a simple tool?

Meanwhile I know nothing about the innocent man, but generally the lawful people don’t spend much time as the criminals in the arts of violence.

I’m a gun nut, and I don’t spend much time. The advantage of having guns is I don’t NEED to. If I wanted to take up Krav Mega, or Kung Fu, it would take me vastly more time to master those skills, and I still wouldn’t be as effective as I am with a gun. (There’s a reason why so many American martial arts masters also have guns. If you can get a better advantage, why not?)

So again, even in Jason’s fantasy world the criminal wins.

Sorry, not on my watch “Baldr”!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | 10 Comments