Gun Control and Ornithopters

Several people are mentioning This Turd By Paul Helmke entitled “Who Would Oppose Closing the Gun Show Loophole?” Its been their recent Meme they’ve been trying out along the lines of modifying their cause with the adjectives “Sensible”, “Reasonable”, and “Moderate”. Why wouldn’t you want “Sensible Gun Control?” Reading this hog wash an image came to mind:

Leonardo Da Vinci’s schetches of Ornithopters.

Leonardo, born in Vinci, Italy, possessed a genius which went far beyond simply being a remarkable artist. He was, perhaps, the first European interested in a practical solution to flight. Leonardo designed a multitude of mechanical devices, including parachutes, and studied the flight of birds as well as their structure. About 1485 he drew detailed plans for a human-powered ornithopter (a wing-flapping device intended to fly). There is no evidence that he actually attempted to build such a device, although the image he presented was a powerful one. The notion of a human-powered mechanical flight device, patterned after birds or bats, recurred again and again over the next four centuries.

Da Vinci was a smart guy, and he knew there would be a way for humans to break their earthly bounds and fly. Being a smart guy he looked at stuff that CAN fly, birds, bats, insects, ect and tried to copy them. Of course humans are NOT birds, bats or insects, we’re built very heavy for strength and durability of terrestrial travel, we’re big creatures (and when you look at the wingspan of Da Vinci’s machine the creation was unnaturally large, and our musculature is built for distance walking, not wing flaps (hell humans are even shitty runners compared to most things in the animal kingdom).

Of course humans Did learn to fly, and its a success. So much that on September 11th when the nations air travel was grounded after the terrorist attack, many of us were suprised at how eerie the sky looked without the sign of a passing airliner.

While we have Helicopters, Airplanes, hovercraft, rockets, and gliders, there are no successful Ornithopters for manned flight. Again Da Vinci was a smart man but he didn’t know all the physics and biology in the late 15th century that we knew in the early 20th century.

Turns out that no matter how smart Da Vinci was, building a “Bird Machine” was just a bad idea and would never work.

As a former supporter of Gun Control I get how non-evil people can support it. It does seem like a good idea when oversimplified on paper…just as Da Vinci’s sketchbook gives us wonder and hope even today, only when you try to put it in reality it just doesn’t work, and can often backfire so badly as to exacerbate the very problems it attempts to solve.

Why do I oppose closing the so-called “Gunshow Loophole”? Well besides the obvious fact that the “Gunshow Loophole” laws are never about gun shows, nor do they address a loophole in the law, even when implemented (Like here in Massachusetts) is accomplishes NOTHING. It doesn’t and won’t work. Its a goddamned ORNITHOPTER!

This entry was posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Gun Control and Ornithopters

  1. Thomas says:

    Starting from a 38.5lb chunk of torch cut 2.8″ steel plate, it takes 292 individual machining operations to make a BREN MK I receiver.

    S’pose Helmke would want people like myself and Wally lobotomized to close the “intelligent hobbyist” loophole?

    When the UK outlawed possession of most all arms, the people that were going to possess arms anyway took the attitude of folks like the IRA amd Drug Dealers etc…and in a land where even 6 round magazines for your .22 target pistol are illegal, may as well build mortars and LMGs to go with the sub-guns and REAL assault rifles you buy on the open market. Mexico, Same. Phillipines, Same. Italy, Same…

    • Weerd Beard says:

      Or make like Dillinger and knock off Police Armories….not as hard as one might think given how easy it is to make explosives.

      As I said above, when simplified and on paper it can be made to look like an AWESOME idea…it just isn’t, its a shitty idea that won’t work and will make things worse, so fuck-off Paul!

    • Oleg Volk says:

      Obviously, antis never looked at STEN submachine guns. Their receivers are tubes made with only a few cuts. They use only a few springs and the issue of making rifles barrels can be solved by using shotgun ammunition. 410 or 20ga open bolt automatic shotgun with slow rate of fire to enable single shots can be made in a lot less than a day using only a drill press, two pipes and a bent sheet metal box for a magazine.

      • Weerd Beard says:

        Wow, I had never thought of simply home-brewing a Sten as a shotgun SMG. Yep you could cobble them together in a basic autobody shop, and probably make several a day if the crew was dedicated.

        Gun control will never work, and has never worked. ’nuff said!

  2. Dixie says:

    Actually, there have been a few functional manned ornithopters, but the amount of work put into them doesn’t translate into results– kind of like gun control.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTIAS_Ornithopter_No.1

    http://www.ornithopter.org/manned.shtml

    • Weerd Beard says:

      Huh Didn’t know about them. Still actually these “Working” Ornis prove my argument better than the one made:

      “the ornithopter was assisted by a turbine jet engine (because the pilot was heavier than the designers expected) and therefore did not take off solely by propulsion from the flapping wings.”

      heh, kinda like how our criminals just steal or borrow guns from each other and simply forgo the permits, training, fees, and paperwork needed to legally buy and sell a firearm in Massachusetts.

      I guess we could add a “turbo-jet” to our laws to assist them…..or we could just go with a design that fucking WORKS!

  3. Pingback: Weer'd World ยป Think you can ban Guns?

  4. Pingback: Sci-Show Takes on da Vinci | Weer'd World

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *