“Progressive” Magical Thinking

“Feminists” really disgust me.

So we have a new Miss USA, and frankly I could care less. Pageants are great ways for women to earn scholarships. I kinda don’t get the whole thing, but at the same time a childhood friend of mine got a nice ride to college because she was really pretty. How can you argue that?

Still this new Miss USA was asked about the problem with sexual assault. Here’s her answer:

Transcript:

“I believe that some colleges may potentially be afraid of having a bad reputation and that would be a reason it could be swept under the rug, because they don’t want that to come out into the public,”Nia Sanchez said. “But I think more awareness is very important so women can learn how to protect themselves. Myself, as a fourth-degree black belt, I learned from a young age that you need to be confident and be able to defend yourself. And I think that’s something that we should start to really implement for a lot of women.”

What’s the “Feminist” response?

We shouldn’t teach women self-defense so they can avoid being raped, rather we should only teach men it is bad to rape.’

Follow the above link for more “Feminist” outrage at this very reasonable response. Man there’s a reason why I put the quotes around “Feminist”, because it isn’t doing women any justice just to demand the world change around them.

Seriously people, there is no place in America in any culture where rape is considered a valid form of sexual intercourse. There might be a few nations where rape might be overlooked because of culture or circumstance, but those places are few and far between, as well as generally being horrible places for ALL humans.

Still there are monsters among us who don’t play by the social rules, and knowing self defense skills will serve EVERYBODY right. Further she didn’t go for the “Progressive” “trigger” by suggesting women carry firearms (I’ll suggest that. If you’re a woman, you should be carrying a gun!) yet still she was attacked by these fools.

So yeah, “Feminists” just call for us to wish that sexual assault didn’t exist (and there has never been a time in humanity, or really in the history of sexual biology where that hasn’t been the case) and realists suggest that if confronted by a sexual predator you hurt them bad enough they decided to not play that game anymore.

If you hurt them with a hollow point round, they may never do that ever again!

This entry was posted in Freedom, Politics, Safety, Self Defense. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to “Progressive” Magical Thinking

  1. The_Jack says:

    Even if education could convince someone not to rape, that doesn’t do much when someone is currently facing a rapist does it? I somehow doubt negotiation or appeals to shame will convince a man who wants to rape.

    What is the “Feminist” response there?

    I use the scare quotes as well because… how is it feminist at all to say that it is wrong to use force on a man who is sexually assaulting her?

    Again, we have people calling themselves feminsits who don’t think women should hurt literal rapist men.

  2. Loess says:

    Are they actually saying that it’s better for women to be *dependent* on men to not assault them? ‘Cause, that’s what it sounds like they are saying.

    And here I thought that a big part of feminism was not being dependent.

  3. Pingback: Derek Ward | Some Feminists Think Learning Self-Defense Is Wrong?

  4. Jack Christopher says:

    “we should only teach men it is bad to rape.”

    I thought that’s what the bullets are for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *