Typical Anti

Discredit opposition (Obviously only Canton Residents can validly claim misconduct when a Police officer threatens to beat and murder a handcuffed and compliant citizen)

Lots of fear mongering about gun rights. Note that he keeps claiming that this is some horrible event because the man was carrying, but the most dangerous person was the out-of-control cop. He also drops the fear flag about carrying in universities and restaurants, which of course he fails to reference problems with that…because there aren’t any.

And of course a combo: “I’m not against guns…” and “Common Sense Gun Control”, well played.

This guy is a total smarmy asshole, and I hope he’s the lawyer defending Officer Roid Rage because this is the best defense that pig deserves!

h/t Breda

This entry was posted in Guns, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Typical Anti

  1. What a jerk. Time for him to be shown the door.

  2. 45er says:

    “It’s not acceptable to carry a weapon under the worst of circumstances… There are deaths waiting to happen.”

    I agree. He’s absolutely right. However, I’d direct this comment to criminals that choose to attack one that wishes to protect themself. I know if I were a resident and this were my city council president, I would make it my life mission to get him tossed out and have someone with half a brain replace him.

  3. Wally says:

    Well he cited the problem being the video going viral. Apparently there was nothing else wrong. He seems to make the case that you don’t need guns late at night in a lousy neighborhood. Would a sunday afternoon in suburbia be okay? And the problem then becomes the insane laws that allow this.

    I could be mistaken, but aren’t we all supposed to follow the law? Not violate it because you think that is right ?

    Common sense gun control – not treating citizens like , hell, I don’t even know what.

    • Weerd Beard says:

      I think his statement is you don’t need A gun in a bad neighborhood early in the morning.

      When I find myself in such a situation I generally carry TWO guns.

      I think that’s what he means! 😉

  4. Bob S. says:

    I like how he starts off dismissing the issue; he’s represented “true victims” of police brutality/abuse.

    Well, that tells us he isn’t going to wait for the results of the investigation to find out what really happened (as if the video wasn’t proof enough).

    I think he also mixed up his words “our citizens” — from the sounds of it, he should have been referring to the people who lived there as “our serfs”.

  5. mike w. says:

    “It’s not acceptable to carry a weapon under the worst of circumstances… There are deaths waiting to happen.”

    Ok then, loet’s start by disarming the police, starting with Officer Harless.

  6. Pingback: Canton: The Gift That Keeps On Giving • Where Angels Fear To Tread

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *