“Gun Death” Pumpkin

Joan Discovered Hickok45 on youtube and has a cow (as to be expected) on him shooting a pumpkin with a gun. Now of course the big take away is that Joan is a miserable old Schoolmarm who doesn’t know how to do anything but wring her hands and feel miserable about life in general. Still I could only think of her when watching this video:

Joan screeches about Hickok calling guns “Tools”, and of course her resident idiots (who never have trouble getting comments posted on her posts) make foolish claims about this somehow being unsafe. (note of course that Hickok shoots thousands of rounds of ammo at his place without ever an injury greater than slide or hammer bite)

Still look at all the non-gun tools he uses to bash pumpkins. Yet another example of “Gun Death”! LOL!

This entry was posted in Gun Death?, Random. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to “Gun Death” Pumpkin

  1. Pyrotek85 says:

    I remember her flipping out way back when I called them tools too, I even cited the dictionary lol

    I know she knows that weapons are types of tools, she’s just being obtuse because she doesn’t want to admit that they’re inanimate and not inherently evil or something.

  2. Shooting a pumpkin is a dream of mine and if I could annoy Joan in the process that would be cool too.

  3. Greg Camp says:

    Further proof that she’s nothing but a desiccated wretch and her buddies are idiots. Hickok45 shoots a pumpkin at his own range, and she yammers on about how he’s dangerous and stupid. She must be great fun at parties.

  4. Cargosquid says:

    Oh, it gets better. Remember how they say that they want a “conversation?”

    Well, PitBullAngel, an apparent dog lover, maybe a rescuer, tried.
    Baldr

    “Speaking in such dramatic terms as “tool of death” doesn’t make you seem any less shrill or anymore credible. This is the kind of thing I was talking about with the rhetoric – sure, the pro2A side goes over the line all the time and there’s a lot to be said about that…but that being said, shrill dramatics aren’t going to allow for the reasonable on my side to take you seriously.

    If you’re looking to gain consensus, drop the dramatics, argue from fact and maybe we’ll work with you.”

    After some back and forth, he added:
    At the risk of running off at the mouth, why not a suggestion? Have a real conversation with folks who are really interested in the balance of safety and fundamental rights? Stop lumping all who support the second amendment, concealed carry et al, as “nuts” or “stupid and dangerous.” I’m not nuts – I’m a fairly well educated individual who works hard every day to support my famiily, is involved in the community and politically and can see that both sides of this issue have the capability to rise above being bickering neonates.

    Again, I’m willing to talk. As are many more of us. Not all of us are out to scream at you and while we cannot control the actions or mouths of the worst of us, we are wholly capable of carrying on as adults.

    All he got was abuse, finally resulting in from Japete:
    I really don’t need any lectures from you. First off, Pit Bull, it’s difficult to even have a reasonable discussion with someone who has chosen the name of PitBullAngel. Second off, I am not lumping all of you into one category. Why do you guys do the same with people like me?

    And she lets the cat of the bag:
    But “fundamental rights” is something that gets in the way of a serious discussion because it tends to lead to anything reasonable being taken off the table in the name of rights. What do you mean by that anyway?

    She REALLY is delusional.

    And the scary part is that, among the people commenting on her “side,” she sounds like the sane one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *