Just found this image and I was rather amused.
Source: Uploaded by user via Baldr on Pinterest
I see nothing wrong with having a shotgun, a pistol, and a rifle for your personal protection guns. My personal setup is a S&W1911 pistol, a Mossberg 590, and an FAL. Some may go the Glock 19, Saiga 12, and AR-15 route, some may go S&W Model 10, Winchester M12, and M1 Garand.
That’s what I’m most amused, is that somehow they’re claiming that there’s something ELSE out there we’re debating. Like maybe a so-called “Assault Rifle” is different than a rifle.
Don’t know my sporting bolt guns very well, that looks like it might be a Winchester Model 70…..note with a weaver rail for a scope…but no scope so the gun cannot be fired accurately in its configuration. Also there’s some sort of over-under skeet gun for the shotgun. Hat tip to Joe Biden with that one. Maybe the author of the image thinks we should violate rule #4 of gun safety and shoot through doors and fire into the air.
And last is some variant of the CZ 75….which has a standard capacity of 15 rounds in its magazine. As in it was restricted by the 1994 “Assault Weapons Ban”.
I went and tracked the author’s facebook page down, and in the comment section its pretty clear he doesn’t care about facts, or accuracy, just propaganda.
somehow they’re claiming that there’s something ELSE out there we’re debating.
But that’s what they Always do.
They come up with some cutesy sound bite slogan that sells well to the uninformed, but has nothing to do with their actual goals, which don’t tend to go over so well.
I don’t think they’re actual agenda would be so successful as a bumper sticker:
It’s just not as catchy.
Love the copy-paste! Was that from the latest McCarthy Bill?
[clap-clap-clap]
Not to mention how gleeful the antis are to go full blame-the-victim / “Maybe if your skirt wasn’t so short you wouldn’t have been raped.”
Which shows why they don’t want the proles to have guns. If a commoner had to defend herself then obviously she was up to something unsavory.
(The rich, powerful, and connected are excepted of course because they’re more important and the choices they’ve made have given them a higher profile and thus the threats they face are “legitimate”. )
And yes, that’s exactly how carry laws in places like NYC and Germany work.
This is why I assume the gun-grabbers have ill intent. If they had no ill intent, they wouldn’t give a rip about the weapons and would focus on dealing with mental illness and career criminals. Instead, they focus on the weapons owned and carried by law-abiding citizens.
So what do they intend to do that requires the targets be disarmed?
I think that the photo is evidence of even greater stupidity. The shotgun looks like an autoloader with an extended magazine tube; e.g. an “assault weapon” in some states.
I’m gong to ditto that. It’s not an OU, it’s a semi with a full length tube. A Remington to my eye, but the image has been flipped (or it’s a lefty model? do they make those?).
The rifle reminds me most of a savage, but it is too blurred for me to tell.
Bullet control was the original idea for this page. I was overwhelmed on how to control 300 million guns that are already out there. Simple Idea. A gun permit is needed to buy bullets.
Brilliant. When faced with the overwhelming task of controlling 300 million guns, focus your attention on the tens (if not hundreds) of billions of smaller, non-serialized, disposable products which are also easily and commonly assembled in people’s homes.
So what about reloaders? Would he require an FFL to own a reloading press?
Don’t tell them about reloading. They already think magazines are one-use; if they hear that brass is reusable they’ll go after reloading supplies.
It will naturally start with requiring retailers to run the check. Later, they’ll realize there is a private transfer loophole, and conclude that the only way to handle this is to make an unauthorized transfer a federal felony. And since he said “bullets” and not “cartridges” or “ammunition” we can conclude that it would be a federal felony to transfer one or more bullets to an assailant’s center of mass.