Joan’s Anti-Reality Force Field

It’s Almost like she lives on a different planet!

You just can’t make this stuff up. An armed woman was shot to death by a guy with a gun in a fight over a chandelier. When a gun is available it may get used against you. This one lends the lie to the gun lobby idea that having a gun for self defense is a good idea because it will save your life. Wrong.

Well except all the studies that aren’t done by compatriots of Joan, point to guns being used to prevent crime is higher than the number of guns used IN crime. Further having a gun to defend yourself is the best way to avoid serious injury in a violent attack!

Also gun ownership is on the rise, but gun crime is DOWN! So again, if Joan’s conjecture is true we would be having MORE crime. Also Joan’s husband owns guns! By her own rational, shouldn’t she have been shot or threatened by those guns by now? Yeah, she has surrounded herself with an anti-reality force field that is IMPENETRABLE BY LOGIC!!

Also for the LOLz I found this on her twitter feed:
Joan Peterson PBS Survey

Here’s the survey!

Even with her spreading the news to all the gun control supporters she knows the survey is running at nearly 95% against additional gun control laws.

Hey, but the gun control people are winning!!!

**UPDATE** Just watched the PBS video attached to the poll. Man that is some SERIOUS anti-gun crap right there. Still the poll is a strong victory. Also why are we funding a network that does propaganda piece against the very people forced under penalty of law to fund them?

This entry was posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Joan’s Anti-Reality Force Field

  1. Eck! says:

    All we can do is laugh at her and let her know that.
    She knows why, she will call us names for doing it.
    The problem in my mind is that loose a grasp on
    reality and with guns in the house she is potentially
    dangerous person.

    I can engage in fantasy as well. Difference is I know it.
    Though based on anti-gun tweets I’ve seen that may
    not be so untrue. Ever since the famous 20 questions
    she has put forth a clearly biased unreal view of the
    world. Unfortunately she is caught up in those using
    that the belief making her just another tool. Being
    used like that must hurt in the face of reality, hence
    the rather aggressive attack that denies reality.

    Eck!

  2. Cargosquid says:

    The current score.
    Would you support more restrictions on guns in your state?
    Yes. Increased regulations on firearms are necessary to prevent another tragedy like the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary. 4.24% (5,069 votes)

    No. Laws like this unnecessarily punish lawful gun owners and will do little to prevent mass shootings. 94.62% (113,087 votes)

    Unsure. It’s important to keep the weapons out of the wrong hands, but this may not be the solution. 1.14% (1,365 votes)

    Total Votes: 119,521

    When it first came out about 3 days ago:
    Thank you for voting!
    Yes. Increased regulations on firearms are necessary to prevent another tragedy like the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary. 3.78% (2,539 votes)

    No. Laws like this unnecessarily punish lawful gun owners and will do little to prevent mass shootings. 95.3% (63,932 votes)

    Unsure. It’s important to keep the weapons out of the wrong hands, but this may not be the solution. 0.92% (614 votes)

    Total Votes: 67,085

    So…to prevent Joan from pointing out that they are winning because the trend line is up for YES…..we need people to over there and vote. Let’s reverse that trend line.

    Because they only need another 108,000 votes all going their way to bring it even……
    🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *