Joan Knows Us Best

Gotta look at this great article by Joan Peterson of the Brady Campaign and the Joyce Foundation:

just love this article found on CNN titled: “Give Gun Owners What They Want.” The article gets to the truth of the matter about gun policy and the resistance to any common sense measures that might actually fit with what gun owners and even many NRA members say they want….So what do the gun rights extremists really want? They don’t like criminals with guns because they are always saying that is why they need their own guns. Let’s see now- maybe they DO actually want criminals to continue to easily get their guns because if we actually prevented ways for them to have their guns, why would the average citizen really need a gun for self defense against all of those criminals without guns? Is this nonsensical argument made on purpose or in denial and ignorance? Or do they even get that they want the same things I want but if we do something about it it will hurt their cause? Do they get that they agree with the folks on the side of preventing gun injuries and death? They say they don’t want people getting killed with guns. But then they resist all attempts to do something about it. Why? Follow the money. The gun industry is a big industry. Would it actually suffer if we stopped criminals from getting guns? I’m not sure how since federally licensed firearms dealers actually keep those with felonies, adjudicated mentally ill people, domestic abusers and other prohibited purchasers from buying guns by requiring a background check. This doesn’t make sense.

Yep, we just want more crime! That’s it! Or maybe we want to be able to buy and sell our property without Big Daddy Government getting into our stuff…or just saying “Nah your name is too common!”, Miguel happens to have the Spanish equivalent of “John Smith”, in a state where there is a massive Hispanic population. Miguel needs to now jump through hoops to prove he’s INNOCENT! (Remember anti-freedom, not anti-gun)

Gun rights extremists don’t believe me when I tell them that NRA resistance to reasonable gun laws is responsible for some of the daily carnage on our streets. Some of my readers here who make regular comments are always itchin’ for a fight with me just because. They love the fight. They love to be against anything I and others like me are for. It’s oppositional. But it’s more than that. It’s some unreasonable fear that if they agree with me something terrible will happen. Like, for instance, someone is going to come around to their houses and seize their precious guns. What a ridiculous and unfounded belief.

Hmmm, even Joan doesn’t think that’s very ridiculous . No they won’t CONFISCATE your guns, they’ll PAY your for your guns at their price against your will….that is if she ever gets her way. Maybe not your “Good Guns” (Remember, her husband owns a few hunting rifles), but your Bad guns…which is whatever she says they are! Nothing like the people who know nothing about guns claiming they can make the rules!

Ah, there’s the rub. Guns don’t wear out or get consumed. Once you have one or two, you have them for a very long time. So in order to keep these folks in business, new markets need to be created. How to do that? Pass laws that get people to think they need more guns ( small concealable guns) or create fear and paranoia of a government run amok coming for your guns ( assault weapons, machine guns, other such weapons usually used by the military). Some people fall for this and run out to get more guns as a result. But still, why resist common sense gun laws? So who are we protecting by resisting, for example, a law that would require background checks on all gun sales? I haven’t heard a good answer to that question from the NRA and its minions. Why? Because there is no answer that makes sense.

Well my Nephew came down for a weekend of shooting. He’s pulled the trigger on a few .22 and a few shotguns in the boyscouts, and his Dad took him hunting with a .30-30 which he only fired a few times.

He wanted to learn how to REALLY shoot, and he wanted to learn to shoot them ALL, rifles, shotguns, and pistols. We started small, and worked our way up to the big stuff, and then we shot Sporting clays together which means he had one shotgun, and I had another. In total we shot 9 different guns…and that’s not even getting into my collectors pieces. Yeah, I don’t make sense! Joan’s the sane one! (snicker)

But this one is the best!

So, I say, let’s do give gun owners the very thing they say they themselves agree to and actually want in poll after poll after poll. I am not going to list the polls. I have done so too many times on this blog. The gun guys know what the polls say.

Of course the “Polls” is ONE Mayors Against Illegal Guns poll that’s been cited by countless people who, like Joan (and MAIG) are paid by the Joyce Foundation, and she’s cited several articles looking at that one poll…made by a criminal organization!

She won’t list other polls…because they don’t exist…and that poll reeks of crap
.

Isn’t it nice that Joan knows us so well! Don’t you all feel like you’ve met your soul mate?

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | 10 Comments

Morning LOL

Via MDEV

Of course those Maine roads are arrow straight for MILES. Still is there a reason why I-95 around Boston is 55 MPH? Of course in practice you’re doing under 40 or over 70 depending on traffic.

Posted in Cars, Random | 2 Comments

“Gun Death” Extension Cord

Back when I first started doing the “Gun Death?” Files I found most of the stories. Now I rarely publish one that isn’t brought to me by a reader. Still back when I went hunting for stories looking up “Stabbing Death” or “Beating Death”, it was too easy, and it made the series almost ironic, as the more exotic the murder weapon, the more foolish it makes the metric of “Gun Death” look.

A search term I would frequently use was “Strangled with Cord”.

A jury in Saginaw has convicted a 37-year-old suspended police officer of first-degree murder in the extension cord strangulation of a woman eight months pregnant with his son….Bluew was with another officer when 32-year-old Jennifer Webb’s body was found Aug. 30, 2011 near a drainage ditch in Buena Vista Township, about 85 miles northwest of Detroit. An extension cord was around Webb’s neck and attached to the roof rack her sport utility vehicle.

A forensic pathologist testified during a preliminary exam that he believes someone killed Webb by approaching her from behind and applying a “chokehold” on the woman. He testified Webb died due to “neck compression” and not because of “ligature strangulation” by hanging herself with an extension cord, though Buena Vista police initially classified her death as a suicide.

Look at all these ugly angles. We have a murder weapon that’s a standard extension cord. A tool just about everybody has, I probably have a dozen kicking around. We have a police officer, the “Only Ones” who can be trusted with guns in the eyes of those who use the metric of “Gun Death”, also it appears the officer used his authority to attempt to classify his dirty work as a suicide.

Also the woman was pregnant, funny how a “Partial Birth Abortion” is considered murder when it isn’t a Doctor doing the killing.

I’m glad justice was served in this grim case. But according to those who use “Gun Death” as a way to push their agenda, he’ll be getting life in prison for NOTHING!

h/t Barron

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Gas

My house is heated with Gas, and gas stoves are the ONLY way to cook. Still don’t we need “Common Sense” gas control?

A roaring explosion that leveled two homes and set two others ablaze in a huge fire forced about 200 people from an Indianapolis neighborhood where two people were killed, authorities said Sunday. The powerful nighttime blast shattered windows, crumpled walls and inflicted other damage on at least 14 other homes.

Four people were taken to a hospital with minor injuries after the explosion and fire, the Indianapolis Fire Department said in a statement. Fire Lt. Bonnie Hensley said firefighters put out the flames and then went through the rubble and damaged homes one at a time in case people had been left behind. Two bodies have been recovered.

More people were killed and harmed than most of the “Mass Shootings” those who use “Gun Death” like to glorify….but they won’t talk about this. Why? Only “Gun Death” counts!

Posted in Gun Death? | 1 Comment

Busy Weekend

I mentioned last week my Nephew was coming down for a visit. Turned out there was a miscommunication and it was this weekend. I think we showed him a good time. Had some good food (including we found out he had never eaten a lobster, so we boiled one up for him, and a certain marine biologist taught him how to detail strip one). Had a dead zone in the afternoon, so we saw Skyfall at the IMAX.

But the big deal was shooting. We did Rifles and Pistols Saturday afternoon, sporting clays Sunday morning, and cleaning Sunday afternoon. I’d say he got a decent crash-course in shooting. A bit more than the boyscouts gave him! 🙂

Means there wasn’t much blogging, but I think you’ll agree, it was worth it!

Posted in Biology, Family and Friends, Food, Guns, Movies | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Pedal Inversion

How often do we hear about this?

One woman was killed after a car crashed into a pizza restaurant in Anna on Friday afternoon….Police said an 80-year-old woman leaving a nearby beauty salon hit the gas instead of the brake pedal as she was pulling out of parking spot.

It’s almost always a beauty salon or a pharmacy, sometimes a supermarket, and the person who mistakes the gas for the brake is ALWAYS well north of 70 years old. After a string of such deaths (one killing a doctor in a hospital) there was an attempt to make older drivers take a competency test to ensure they are still fit to drive. It got shot down by the Massachusetts legislature, because retired seniors have very high voter turnout.

This is the same state where I need an expensive permit to OWN or BUY guns. Yeah, they’re concerned about our safety!

h/t Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | 3 Comments

“Gun Death” Bees

While Mowing his lawn!

Authorities say a 65-year-old South Texas man has died after being attacked by bees while mowing his lawn.

For people with bee allergies one sting can be fatal, but bee venom is toxic so a good swarm attack will kill the best of us. I once disturbed a buried nest with my lawn mower, but I saw the hole expanding and the menacing yellow cloud, and I ran for the bee spray and hosed the nest down before any harm could come of it.

Hey, but not a “Gun Death”, so it doesn’t count!

h/t Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | 3 Comments

The Religion of Climate Change

Have a few articles piling up in my inbox so I thought I’d drop them all in one post. First this:

In this article, McKibben lays out 3 fundamental climate numbers: to stay below (1) 2°C of warming (the limit the world’s scientists have said might help us avoid the worst of climate change), we can only burn (2) 565 more gigatons (a billion tons) of carbon dioxide, which will force a battle with the fossil fuel industry since it has (3) 2,795 gigatons in reserve. These are important numbers to wrap your head around, but what do they really mean for countries and companies? How fast do we have to change?

To answer these tough questions, we can turn to two of the world’s best number crunchers, McKinsey and PwC (full disclosure: I have a consulting partnership arrangement with PwC US). Last week PwC released its Low Carbon Economy Index 2012 report, which calculated one simple, powerful number: In order to meet the 2°C warming target, we will need to reduce the global carbon intensity (how much carbon it takes to produce every unit of energy or GDP) by 5.1% every year until 2050. For perspective, in 2011 carbon intensity improved just 0.8%.

Of course the “World’s Scientists” are all the scientists not branded as “Heretics” by mentioning the conspiracy to “Hide the Decline”

Then these two articles:

The first direct evidence that marked changes to Antarctic sea ice drift have occurred over the last 20 years, in response to changing winds, is published this week in the journal Nature Geoscience. Scientists from NERC’s British Antarctic Survey (BAS) and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena California explain why, unlike the dramatic losses reported in the Arctic, the Antarctic sea ice cover has increased under the effects of climate change….Lead author, Dr Paul Holland of BAS says: “Until now these changes in ice drift were only speculated upon, using computer models of Antarctic winds. This study of direct satellite observations shows the complexity of climate change. The total Antarctic sea-ice cover is increasing slowly, but individual regions are actually experiencing much larger gains and losses that are almost offsetting each other overall. We now know that these regional changes are caused by changes in the winds, which in turn affect the ice cover through changes in both ice drift and air temperature. The changes in ice drift also suggest large changes in the ocean surrounding Antarctica, which is very sensitive to the cold and salty water produced by sea-ice growth.”

“Sea ice is constantly on the move; around Antarctica the ice is blown away from the continent by strong northward winds. Since 1992 this ice drift has changed. In some areas the export of ice away from Antarctica has doubled, while in others it has decreased significantly.”

And

During the last few million years, global ice-volume variability has been one of the main feedback mechanisms in climate change, because of the strong reflective properties of large ice sheets. Ice volume changes in ancient times can be reconstructed from sea-level records. However, detailed assessment of the role of ice volume in climate change is hindered by inadequacies in sea-level records and/or their timescales.

Now, for the first time, scientists are able to accurately date continuous sea-level records, to allow detailed comparisons of the ice-volume variability with independently dated ice-core records from Antarctica and Greenland.

Previous studies of the timing of past ice-volume changes relied on the ‘Red Sea relative sea-level (RSL) record’ for reconstruction of highly resolved and continuous records of sea-level variability over the past 500,000 years. The drawback of the RSL method, however, is that it did not have independent age control. This inhibited detailed comparison with other well-dated climate parameters, such as temperature or CO2 records from ice cores.

Again, the Earth’s climate has never been static, but NOW when its changing its OUR FAULT! Also “Global Warming” has gotten so bad its actually getting COLDER! Tithe and REPENT sinners!

h/t Mrs. Weer’d

Posted in Politics | 2 Comments

“Gun Death” Tuna Cooker

WOW!

Authorities say a 62-year-old employee was cooked to death at a Southern California seafood plant for tuna maker Bumble Bee Foods.

YIKES!!!

Hey but only “Gun Death” counts, right? Just look away!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

SQUIRREL REPORT! (Maybe)

Our Streaming servers may be down. we’ll see.

No matter, we’re having a show tonight!

Tune in if you can, certainly call in because that still works!

9pm EST!

ITS THE SQUIRREL REPORT!

Posted in Podcast, Politics | Leave a comment