“Gun Death” Pedal Inversion

How often do we hear about this?

One woman was killed after a car crashed into a pizza restaurant in Anna on Friday afternoon….Police said an 80-year-old woman leaving a nearby beauty salon hit the gas instead of the brake pedal as she was pulling out of parking spot.

It’s almost always a beauty salon or a pharmacy, sometimes a supermarket, and the person who mistakes the gas for the brake is ALWAYS well north of 70 years old. After a string of such deaths (one killing a doctor in a hospital) there was an attempt to make older drivers take a competency test to ensure they are still fit to drive. It got shot down by the Massachusetts legislature, because retired seniors have very high voter turnout.

This is the same state where I need an expensive permit to OWN or BUY guns. Yeah, they’re concerned about our safety!

h/t Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | 3 Comments

“Gun Death” Bees

While Mowing his lawn!

Authorities say a 65-year-old South Texas man has died after being attacked by bees while mowing his lawn.

For people with bee allergies one sting can be fatal, but bee venom is toxic so a good swarm attack will kill the best of us. I once disturbed a buried nest with my lawn mower, but I saw the hole expanding and the menacing yellow cloud, and I ran for the bee spray and hosed the nest down before any harm could come of it.

Hey, but not a “Gun Death”, so it doesn’t count!

h/t Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | 3 Comments

The Religion of Climate Change

Have a few articles piling up in my inbox so I thought I’d drop them all in one post. First this:

In this article, McKibben lays out 3 fundamental climate numbers: to stay below (1) 2°C of warming (the limit the world’s scientists have said might help us avoid the worst of climate change), we can only burn (2) 565 more gigatons (a billion tons) of carbon dioxide, which will force a battle with the fossil fuel industry since it has (3) 2,795 gigatons in reserve. These are important numbers to wrap your head around, but what do they really mean for countries and companies? How fast do we have to change?

To answer these tough questions, we can turn to two of the world’s best number crunchers, McKinsey and PwC (full disclosure: I have a consulting partnership arrangement with PwC US). Last week PwC released its Low Carbon Economy Index 2012 report, which calculated one simple, powerful number: In order to meet the 2°C warming target, we will need to reduce the global carbon intensity (how much carbon it takes to produce every unit of energy or GDP) by 5.1% every year until 2050. For perspective, in 2011 carbon intensity improved just 0.8%.

Of course the “World’s Scientists” are all the scientists not branded as “Heretics” by mentioning the conspiracy to “Hide the Decline”

Then these two articles:

The first direct evidence that marked changes to Antarctic sea ice drift have occurred over the last 20 years, in response to changing winds, is published this week in the journal Nature Geoscience. Scientists from NERC’s British Antarctic Survey (BAS) and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena California explain why, unlike the dramatic losses reported in the Arctic, the Antarctic sea ice cover has increased under the effects of climate change….Lead author, Dr Paul Holland of BAS says: “Until now these changes in ice drift were only speculated upon, using computer models of Antarctic winds. This study of direct satellite observations shows the complexity of climate change. The total Antarctic sea-ice cover is increasing slowly, but individual regions are actually experiencing much larger gains and losses that are almost offsetting each other overall. We now know that these regional changes are caused by changes in the winds, which in turn affect the ice cover through changes in both ice drift and air temperature. The changes in ice drift also suggest large changes in the ocean surrounding Antarctica, which is very sensitive to the cold and salty water produced by sea-ice growth.”

“Sea ice is constantly on the move; around Antarctica the ice is blown away from the continent by strong northward winds. Since 1992 this ice drift has changed. In some areas the export of ice away from Antarctica has doubled, while in others it has decreased significantly.”

And

During the last few million years, global ice-volume variability has been one of the main feedback mechanisms in climate change, because of the strong reflective properties of large ice sheets. Ice volume changes in ancient times can be reconstructed from sea-level records. However, detailed assessment of the role of ice volume in climate change is hindered by inadequacies in sea-level records and/or their timescales.

Now, for the first time, scientists are able to accurately date continuous sea-level records, to allow detailed comparisons of the ice-volume variability with independently dated ice-core records from Antarctica and Greenland.

Previous studies of the timing of past ice-volume changes relied on the ‘Red Sea relative sea-level (RSL) record’ for reconstruction of highly resolved and continuous records of sea-level variability over the past 500,000 years. The drawback of the RSL method, however, is that it did not have independent age control. This inhibited detailed comparison with other well-dated climate parameters, such as temperature or CO2 records from ice cores.

Again, the Earth’s climate has never been static, but NOW when its changing its OUR FAULT! Also “Global Warming” has gotten so bad its actually getting COLDER! Tithe and REPENT sinners!

h/t Mrs. Weer’d

Posted in Politics | 2 Comments

“Gun Death” Tuna Cooker

WOW!

Authorities say a 62-year-old employee was cooked to death at a Southern California seafood plant for tuna maker Bumble Bee Foods.

YIKES!!!

Hey but only “Gun Death” counts, right? Just look away!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

SQUIRREL REPORT! (Maybe)

Our Streaming servers may be down. we’ll see.

No matter, we’re having a show tonight!

Tune in if you can, certainly call in because that still works!

9pm EST!

ITS THE SQUIRREL REPORT!

Posted in Podcast, Politics | Leave a comment

Ladies = SCREWED!

Posted in Freedom, Politics | 4 Comments

Compare and Contrast

I thought I’d pare these two stories, first Via Mrs. Weer’d

There is a simple power story often told about such behavior: research shows that people with more power tend to pay less attention to others. They are more action-oriented, pursue their own goals, and exhibit disinhibited behavior in part because they believe that rules don’t apply to them; they are special and invulnerable….First, a definition: narcissistic leaders, as research by Stanford colleague Charles O’Reilly and colleagues notes, are characterized by the traits of dominance, self-confidence, a sense of entitlement, grandiosity, and low empathy. As Michael Maccoby pointed out in The Productive Narcissist, many well-known, even iconic leaders such as Martha Stewart, Jack Welch, and Bill Gates are almost certainly narcissistic personalities, and narcissism is useful for attaining leadership positions, maintaining power, and even stimulating creativity and innovation. O’Reilly’s research on narcissism among Silicon Valley executives shows that narcissistic CEOs earn more, last in their jobs longer, and also have a larger gap between their pay and the pay of their senior team.

Evidence from surveys of college students shows that the level of narcissism has been rising over time — a possible answer for why leaders today are getting into more trouble than in the past. And examinations of the structure of narcissism and how narcissistic behavior differs between men and women helps explain the gender imbalance: “Past research suggests that exploitive tendencies and open displays of feelings of entitlement will be less integral to narcissism for females than for males” simply because women face more social constraints and social sanctions for grandiosity and self-aggrandizement than do men.

I would also say the 24hour News Media is giving more fame to more Narcissists, which allows them to get in more trouble.

Compare to Joan Peterson who says ITS GUNS!!111!!

You choose, which is more logical and “Common Sense”? *snicker*

Posted in Biology, Guns, Politics | Leave a comment

When Broke…

Waste Money!

Often referred to as the “people’s republic of Santa Monica” because of its socially conscious government, the Los Angeles coastal suburb now wants to find out whether its citizens are feeling groovy….Santa Monica made the proposal in hopes of winning a $5 million Bloomberg Philanthropies grant. It’s one of 20 Mayors Challenge finalists named last week.

The city has already completed a youth well-being study that found most students were healthy and felt safe at school.

Or you could pay your damn bills!

California is showing all the fiscal responsibility of a lottery winner!

Posted in Politics | 1 Comment

Passing it on

Via Tam:

Its nice seeing that these points are becoming boilerplate.

Good luck, Antis!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety | 1 Comment

“Gun Death” Sports Fan!

Is it guns that cause violence?

Chicago Bears fan who came to Jacksonville for the Bears-Jaguars football game died after his throat was slashed inside a bar….A news release issued by the sheriff’s office on Monday said witnesses told detectives that Hinson cut Pettry’s throat, put the bloody knife in his pocket and calmly walked out of the restaurant.

Maybe we should ban sports because some people just get carried away! I mean that’s their logic right?

h/t Maddmedic and

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment