Confidence and Defensive Guns

MattW tells of people who are nervous of the long-heavy, but still Single-action trigger of the XD pistols in the comment section. BTW I’m amused by the description of “Condition 1/2”, tho frankly I still consider triggers like the XD or the Glock or other long, but relatively light trigger as “DAO”, even tho mechanically they’re all drastically different.

Still all the mechanical goodness, and the comfort that if your gun discharges in your holster when you’re not touching it, you have a solid case of getting a good negligence settlement from the gun maker, sometimes you just don’t feel comfortable with a gun.

I’m no different. I wouldn’t be comfortable carrying a DA Gun that also has a manual safety because I’d be concerned that it would be bummed on in the holster. I won’t carry a gun with with a magazine disconnect (Tho I will argue that while it may do me no harm, there is NO way a Mag Disconnect will do me a lick of good…don’t buy guns with mag disconnects!)

Despite having heavyweight kills such a Archduke Franz Ferdinand and Adolph Hitler, Among Countless others, I won’t carry a gun in .32 ACP, and my personal carry load are .45 ACP +P HST. Look with a big .45 standard pressure, and even cheap-ass Hollow-points would probably do just as good a job, but I need the spendy bonded hollow-points pushed 100fps faster. Also 180 Grain .45s carry a LOT of muzzle energy…but I feel more comfortable with a heavier bullet.

BTW I also see guns like the Ruger LC9 as being loaded with Failure points because it has a thumb safety, magazine disconnect, a loaded chamber indicator, and a magazine disconnect….but I carry a 1911 that has a Schwartz-style firing pin block, a grip safety, and a manual safety.

Look it doesn’t have to make sense. If you carry a S&W M&P, but felt a lot better about the gun with the added thumb safety, really what’s the harm.

Still be careful with how far you go with rituals. Like carrying condition 3 because its “Safer”. Yes it IS safer…but it means that if you’re carrying items, or have a loved one on your off-hand, or your off-hand is injured or entrapped, the gun is a LOT safer for your attacker too. I’m just sayin’.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Lunchbreak Musings

I love southern-style greens. Recently I’ve had a SERIOUS craving for them, and at the store my favorites, the Mustard Greens looked lousy. I wasn’t in the mood for Collard or Kale, and overall Swiss Chard is just too mild for my tastes and I only eat it when they sell it cheap at the farmer’s market. But the Turnip Greens looked REALLY good, and never having tried them before I bought a pound of them.

I made a vegetarian version of this recipe. Essentially I ditched the smoked turkey and salt for a few tablespoons of Olive oil, and a few canned chipotle peppers.

My goodness Turnip greens are GOOOD! Great texture and a nice flavor. They aren’t as tough or bitter as Collards or Kale, but I still prefer Mustard greens. That being said they worked good!

Posted in Food | Leave a comment

Advice From The Enemy

I gotta love when the other side of the contest gives advice to their opponents.

Former President Bill Clinton acknowledges that Mitt Romney and Rick Perry are the clear front-runners for the Republican presidential nomination, but he says it’s too early to count out former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Thanks Billy, we’ll take this with as much reguard as when Newsweek said John Huntsman’s shit smelled like warm apple pie.

You don’t want to take my advice on what would make a good Democrat either, because I’d describe a Democrat that sounds a lot like a Libertarian with concerns for national defense.

We’re on different sides because we see things a different way. Also in the end most of these people are total partisan hacks, they support the weakest candidate, and then attack them mercilessly once they’re out front. See also the Media’s handling of John McCain. Mac was the golden boy of the MSM until the other Republicans folded then that week they claimed he could never be president because he was born in Panama. (Now the Panama Canal zone, and on a US Army Base, both of which were US Soil at the time)

Snakes and their games…

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

I LOL’d

Obama says ‘better ideas’ will win him re-election

President Barack Obama says he intends to win the 2012 election because he’s got “better ideas.”

When he has one, I wonder if he’ll let us know. This is some of the hilarity of putting a man who has never had a serious job, or ever had to show accountability into an executive position.

I think the people are seeing it too.

Posted in Politics, Random | Leave a comment

Condition 2

So JP over at the Empty Mags Podcast takes one of my posts, and turns it into a show topic on 1911 carry.

Now JP talks about all the conditions of 1911 carry, and talks about them specifically with the M1911 pattern pistol. I won’t riff much on what he said because he was pretty much spot-on. I will say that M1911 pistols can discharge if the hammer is down on a live round unless the gun is on the half-cock notch. Furthermore JP points out expertly that it is an ergonomic nightmare to deploy a 1911 and fan the hammer on the draw. It can be done, and its less of a pain than say Condition 3 carry where the slide is racked on the draw. Personally I believe that when I NEED my gun, seconds count, and I want to be able to take as much advantage of that as possible, so I carry in Condition 1 (cocked and locked) because I can quickly, and safely deploy the pistol with one hand. Now my HD gun is in Condition 3 with an empty chamber because its not on my person. Other than that Its cocked-and-locked, or being cleaned.

Still JP doesn’t talk much about OTHER models of guns. Now I’ll note that the 4 conditions of readiness were made specifically for the M1911 pistol so there is really a LOT of gray area in the carry methods. Like how does one consider the “Safe Action” striker fired guns? Like your Glocks, or your M&Ps, or Kahrs. Or guns like the Para LDA or the Ruger LC9 where the hammer is partially charged just like the striker. These guns are KINDA cocked, and KINDA not. Frankly I see a long and not-quite-as-heavy-as-necessary trigger pull as close-enough for carry like a true DAO gun like my S&W642 revolver that has a completely concealed hammer. Same for guns like the Springfield XD or the Walther PPS which the striker is 100% cocked, but for mechanical reasons I’m unaware of the gun mimics a partially-charged striker on the trigger pull. I also consider these guns to be essentially DAO, so for all of them their ONLY method of carry is Condition 2. We can argue mechanics, but logistically its Condition 2.

All revolvers, be it a modern Double-Action, or an Oldschool Single-action are carried Condition 2 (tho SA guns without a transfer bar, or hammer-block safety they’re KINDA carried Condition 3 as the hammer should be lowered on an empty chamber).

Also traditional hammer-guns can have some extra issues as well, like a traditional Beretta gun, or other guns with a decocking safety where the gun can have the hammer down AND the safety on, which you can’t do with a 1911 that has a safety that blocks the hammer. Now while I don’t think its smart to carry a SAO gun like the M1911 with the hammer down, there are some DA/SA guns that have a 1911-style safety that blocks the hammer. The best example is the traditional CZ-75, now I haven’t done much work withe the 75, but overall I think its a VERY groovy gun, I own a CZ-82 which has a similar operation. The 82, and its .380/.32 ACP cousin the CZ-83 are REALLY cool and affordable guns, that give you a Double-stack compact gun in a light caliber. When shooting my 82 I find my hands are a bit too big for manipulating the thumb safety on the gun. If I were to carry my 82 I’d lower the hammer on a live round and holster. Now the CZ-82 has both a hammer block safety AND a rebounding hammer so its VERY safe to carry in this way, still this DOES mean pulling the trigger on a loaded gun. Now easing the hammer down, and maybe keeping a finger between the hammer and the firing pin will make you mostly safe, I’d still get myself a bucket and fill it with sand and just keep the muzzle pointed down into the bucket while I decock, and the sand will stop just about anything. But while carrying the gun will be in condition 2 and the safety cannot turn on, and to fire you simply draw and make a double-action trigger pull. Of course guns like this, or guns that use a 3-position safety like FNH and H&K among others you can choose to carry the gun hammer back, or hammer down safely.

With guns that have no manual safety at all but are DA/SA like most Sig Sauers or the Walther P99 Condition 2 is the only game in town.

That’s one of the first steps to finding what carry gun is best for you, how would you like to carry. Me personally I like a crips SA trigger pull every time with a manual safety that I can swipe off and hold off while assuming my normal firing grip. Of course the M1911 is the king of this but there are many guns that are similar.

Also I very much like an identical DA trigger pull for every shot, and I like that with a trigger like that no additional safties are required, so guns like DA Revolvers, and guns like the Glock and M&P appeal to me.

Some people prefer the added safety of having a manual safety to disengage as WELL as that DA trigger pull. So long as you train with it, there isn’t much problem with that. Further if the gun you have has a Decocking safety or a DAO trigger and a manual safety it might be wise to practice sweeping the safety off on the draw in the event that it gets bumped on in your travels.

So yeah, Condition 2 can be cool, given that your gun is designed to be carried hammer-down, and has a DA trigger that doesn’t demand you fan the hammer before you fire. Certainly I love it in “DAO” type guns like Glocks, M&Ps, and Kahr, and in Revolvers, and I’m a fan of the classic Sig Sauers, and I have no problem with the Walther P99 (tho frankly I find that piece to be a very Vanilla gun with very little that knocks my socks off).

And I like it LOADS better than Condition 3 for carry as you are dependent on having a 2nd hand to rack the slide, and you may only have one hand available in a time of need.

So go Listen to JP’s Podcast, and Go carry your guns!

Posted in Guns, Podcast, Safety | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Pregnant Meth Mule

The title says it all.

She admits there was meth in the car and that her daughter, 19-year-old Megan Long, did hide it inside her body. She defends herself by denying that the meth was hers or that she asked her pregnant daughter to stuff it. Murray County Coroner Alan Robbins says there’s a strong possibility Megan died after meth seeped into her system.

Work as a Drug Mule long enough, eventually your containment is going to fail, and it could kill you. The fact that she was pregnant and doing this bullshit is really sad.

But not sad for those who use the made-up metric of “Gun Death”, this story would ONLY be sad to them if she had been shot in the proverbial “Drug Deal Gone Wrong”.

h/t Wallphone

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

I have a Bit of a Problem

All this talk about EDC knives, I thought I’d snap a picture of my Knife Caddy made for my collection by the wife.

I carry at least one of these knives every day, and while I have my favorites that I carry more than others, all of them find themselves in my pocket at one time or another.

I need to do reviews on several of them.

Posted in blades | Leave a comment

Safety Advice of the Antis

I got thinking about this post and the comments that are coming in. I thought I’d give a riff of analogies of things that follow the same vein of “I’ve never carried a gun, and I’m still alive, so you’re foolish for carrying a gun!” argument.

Of course all below are in jest, and should be taken as seriously as an anti telling you to not carry.

-I’ve smoked cigarettes and cigars to some degree since I turned 18, and I’ve never had cancer or emphysema. Obviously this means that the hazards of smoking are just paranoia.

-I’ve been in several car accidents, but I’ve never been injured, or seen an airbag deploy. Obviously auto safety features are a scam of the auto industry.

– I have had unprotected sex, and I have yet to have an unwanted pregnancy, nor an STI, so safe sex is obviously just paranoia.

-Tho I have no way of verifying it, I suspect that there have been times in my youth when I’ve driven an automobile when I was over the blood alcohol limit. I also suspect that I’ve been driven by people who were legally drunk. None of these events resulted in an arrest, nor an accident, so obviously people being concerned about drunk driving are paranoid.

-I have never had a home fire, or had my smoke detectors detect anything but dinner being burned. I’ve never heard my CO detectors chime on anything but their manual test. Home fires or CO poisoning are obviously problems of less civilized nations not at war.

-I have a home alarm, but it has never had anything but false alarms. People who are concerned about burglary or home invasions are paranoid.

-Neither I, nor my wife have been sexually assaulted. People who take precautions against rape are just being paranoid!

-I’ve managed to live my whole life without having a heart attack, or diabetes. People who watch their weight and diet are being overly fearful.

Man the list could go on! BTW it just so happens that I personally know at LEAST one person who has been effected by every single one of these dangers. The world is not a safe place, but it is possible to avoid serious harm with just dumb luck if you use a narrow enough scope, and a short enough timeline.

Don’t take advice from illogical people. That goes double for illogical people with a political agenda!

Posted in Safety | Leave a comment

Modern Sporting Rifle

The antis have had a lot of fun with attempting to control the language to their favor. Stuff like “Assault Weapons”, “High Capacity Bullet Clips” and “Armor Piercing Ammunition” really only exist from them attempting to vilify common guns as something they aren’t. Well recently there has been a push-back. The Article seems to take a shine to the AR-platform, tho I’d say any modern semi-auto rifle will count.
The Antis don’t seem to like this at all.

NSSF begs gun rights activists to call assault rifles “modern sporting rifles.” Ridiculous? You bet.

NSSF to gun writers, please, please, please use the term “modern sporting rifle.”

Of course we’ll first take note that most of these Sporting Rifles are based on military designs, what’s neat is the older bolt, lever, and pump-action sporting rifles that are falling out of favor were also based on military patterns. Heck even black powder rifles were once the main battle rifle of the military. So heritage doesn’t really count.

I guess “Modern” could be a little suspect as the AR platform was invented in the 50s, the Guns like the FAL, M14, the CETME, the SKS, M1 Carbine and the AK all from the 40s. Still we have guns like the Bushmaster ACR, and the FNH SCAR pattern guns that are brand-spanking new. Certainly compared to Pump action, the Mauser-style bolt action, and the lever action, which are all 19th century technology, they are “modern” by comparison.

Sporting? Well I can think of two very popular sports where they’re only-way-to-go.

The other sport that is often thought of for “Sporting Rifle” is hunting. The AR-15 is the Swiss-Army gun as far as that goes, you can mount uppers that will take any game animal in North America, and the better part of the world, anything from rabbits and such with a .22 Conversion, Prairie Dogs and varmints with .223, to Moose and Bear with .450 Bushmaster or .50 Beowulf. All from a standard AR-platform. Of course AR-10 style rifles, and the H&K G3 CETME, or the M14/M1A, or FN FAL pattern rifles are in 7.62x51mm/.308 Winchester which is one of the most popular sporting cartridges out there for medium to large game. Also an AK pattern in the ubiquitous 7.62x39mm round is close enough to the .30-30 Winchester to be interchangeable with it.

And as an added bonus these sporting guns are excellent for self defense!

So what part was “Ridiculous”?

So if you insist we use the term, I don’t see a reason why not!

Posted in Guns, Politics | Leave a comment

We Should Listen To Her!

Found this from the antis.

There has never been a moment in my life when having a gun on my person would have helped or saved me or my loved ones in any way. And before assuming my life has been a sheltered pile of roses, I will assure you that is not the case. I was once choked to the point of neck bruising by an ex-con. I spent a few nights sleeping in a car. I walked home (near downtown Milwaukee) alone in the middle of the night several times. There have been a number of situations of which could have led me to much harm. In none of those circumstances do I feel that carrying a gun would have helped me.

Ummm Can you tell us where to send flowers? She kinda reminds me of the Panda’s who refuse to have sex in the zoo. There’s a reason why the Human population keeps growing, and Pandas will probably one-day only exist in captivity.

I’ve got no problem with you deciding that a gun won’t do you any good because you haven’t been killed yet (Kinda the opposite of the “From My Cold Dead Hands” Cry) but I’ll be a little less risk tolerant, and keep a .45 on hand.

BTW there are members of my family and friends who ARE alive today because they were carrying a gun. And just to further ellipse this idiot, there are a HUGE number of my family and friends who own and carry guns and haven’t used them…or had a major problem because of them.

So why not carry, you never know. Buckling you safety belt and a multi-vitamin wouldn’t hurt either!

Posted in Guns, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment