OK first saying that guns cause crime…without ever actually saying it.
Then dropping the “guns are just for killing” fallacy…while coupling it with “Politically Correct guns are ok”….by his argument a Ruger mk III target is “Just For Killing”, but a Browning Auto Five…or the Rem 870 used in the Colorado shooting is just fine.
BTW have you noticed that antis do this? They pretend to be “moderate” by framing the argument with things they neither believe or respect. I think there’s only one way to take the argument that follows…they don’t really believe that either.
Even then antis never dare to step down from the ivory tower so that they might see that their “bold” “fresh” argument has been beaten to death ages ago!.
I know you probably don’t know any gunnies, and if you do they constantly assure you their guns are only for hunting, and they’re all wood and blue steel, honest, and they assure you they’re guilty about owning things, and they can’t recite the text of the 2nd Amendment.
But the next time you think you’re being clever or original, they make tools for that!
Of course not that he believes any of that in the first place, nor does he care what we lawful gun owners think, his dream is to eradicate our rights, then smugly sit back and let the police sort us out.