Weer’d To Antis

Bring it! The antis are talking about banning guns.

Democratic senators flung open the door Sunday for a renewed debate on national gun laws, vowing in the aftermath of the deadly Connecticut school shootings to immediately introduce gun-ban legislation and take the issue to the chamber floor.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein said she will introduce a bill on the first day Congress returns in January to ban the sale of so-called “assault weapons” and high-capacity ammunition clips.

Bring it Dianne! Same with Junta Bloomy:

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Friday called on President Barack Obama to take action to combat gun violence following the slaying of 20 children at an elementary school in Connecticut, saying “not even kindergarteners learning their A, B, C’s are safe.”

In a statement issued less than an hour after an emotional Obama wiped away tears during a press conference at the White House, Bloomberg said the president “rightfully sent his heartfelt condolences” to the families of the victims, but what the “country needs” is for Obama to send a bill to Congress to “fix this problem.”

Joan Peterson too!

They want to talk about the mental illness but not about the guns. They want to say a teacher with a gun could have stopped the rampage. Have they ever worked in an elementary school like I have to know how insane that idea actually is? Their arguments are not based in reality.

Have I worked in an Elementary school? Nope. I’ve got one better, I worked in a Daycare that also had a kindergarten. I was a teen when I worked there, but knowing what I do, I don’t know if I could have stopped this, but I DO know the chances of a better outcome if an armed person caring for the kids intervened would have certainly made things BETTER not worse.

Of course the ugly truth is that EVERY one of these mass shootings has been in a “Gun Free Zone” of some sort.

EVERY ONE! Some the signs had force of law, others they didn’t, but most people don’t want to break the rules.

You think this is a coincidence? The shooters pick these spots because they KNOW they’ll encounter no resistance until cops arrive, and then they can kill themselves. They likely fantasize about this because they know they’re abject losers, but they’ll become famous for WEEKS after their death thanks to the News Media dancing in the blood.

Remember it isn’t always cops, ANY resistance is met with suicide! Again ANY resistance is met with suicide!

The truth is they DON’T want to discuss this, because that would mean they might get asked if gun control laws actually ENABLE this kind of shooting.

It does enable them, why else to they ALWAYS pick posted sites to go shooting?


This entry was posted in Freedom, Guns, Safety, Self Defense. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Weer’d To Antis

  1. Jack says:

    National Review is also putting out the point that it’s ALWAYS in Gun Free Zones

    One exception could be Giffords in Tucson, but other than that EVERY single time for over half a century.

    • Weerd Beard says:

      Well The Tuscon shooting was a VIP assassination, and those almost always happen in public spaces.

    • Jake says:

      That article just told me something I hadn’t heard before.

      He [John Lott] noted that the Aurora shooter, who killed twelve people earlier this year, had a choice of seven movie theaters that were showing the Batman movie he was obsessed with. All were within a 20-minute drive of his home. The Cinemark Theater the killer ultimately chose wasn’t the closest, but it was the only one that posted signs saying it banned concealed handguns carried by law-abiding individuals. All of the other theaters allowed the approximately 4 percent of Colorado adults who have a concealed-handgun permit to enter with their weapons.

      Coincidence? Somehow I doubt it.

  2. Oh, they’re gonna bring it. They are just waiting for the next batch to be sworn in. And I’m sure there are enough RINOs to go along with the DemaCommies to screw us over, especially since the Anointed One signaled last night to “Go For It.”

    Of course, everyone knows that it’s OKAY to have Voted for Obama, because he hasn’t supported Gun Control Laws like Romney did.

    • Jack says:


      Of course, if Romney had won, he’d have made the same signals. And might have gotten more bipartisan crossover. Maybe the law he’d ramed would have been less onerous. In this unicorn hypothetical the president would ahve to worry about reelection. Maybe not.

  3. Bob S. says:

    But we’ve always been told we are paranoid !!!!!!

    This can’t be happening. All the antis I talk to assure me that no one wants to ban my guns !!

    Could it be they’ve been LYING?

  4. Cargosquid says:

    Ol’ Joan is “feeling hopeful” in her last post, talking about Obama “taking action.”

    My reply, which won’t get printed.
    200 dead Mexicans from Fast and Furious.

    I refuse to be lectured to by a gun smuggler that knowingly supplies arms to criminals and commits acts of war by arming terrorists by supplying arms to Al Qaeda affiliates in Libya.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *