Thanks to all who keep sending me “Gun Death?” stories. I’ve actually become overwhelmed with them. I didn’t want to forget any, nor did I want to pile them together to belittle each individual case, so instead I posted them all individually and syndicated them thanks to the wonders of blogging software.
Expect a new “Gun Death?” story every morning at 0500 hours every day for the next week. And of course keep sending me stories, I’ll post the ones I see, but more eyes are always more efficient.
Also remember why I do this. Whenever somebody attempts to argue in favor of gun control and thinks “Gun Death” or “Gun Violence” are valid terms, send them this way I take no joys in repeating brutal crimes, but if this helps save our freedom and knock some sense into people then its worth it.
Thanks to you all!
When ever anybody tries to interest you in “registering” as a gun owner if you are not OBVIOUSLY in the firearms trade, be it by registering firearms or by accepting the idea of carry permits, keep THIS in mind:
ATF hasn’t had an acting director in basically FOREVER because they can’t find anybody clean enough to get through the confirmation process.
DOJ has had no problem with capriciously persecuting, and at times, murdering people over firearms ownership.
You’re one supreme court vote away from losing the “victories” of McDonald ahd Parker-Heller, that were NOT victories.
An example of pragmatic people that registered as asked.
1989
Georgia
Government Forces “accidentally killed” dozens of protesters with gas in Tbilisi
They rounded up 66,000 lawfully owned firearms not at all related to the protesters or the families
IN A NUMBER OF HOURS
BECAUSE THEY HAD A LIST
HOURS
SIXTY-SIX THUOSAND LAWFULLY HELD ARMS
HOURS
THINK ABOUT IT
I can’t sleep so I have a thought to offer:
If you are a “prag” and go down the road of allowing your rights to become regulated privs, and you realize that things are continuing down the same path they always have…at what point do you say “HEY! Wait A MINUTE!” because you realized you’re marching down the wrong road.
If you follow I-10 West from San Antonio to LA, get yourself and a car on a boat, travel across oceans and such, you CAN land your car in Florida, but it’d be fookin’ simpler to drive East to Florida instead of BUILDING YOUR OWN FOOKING ROADBLOCKS.
Arizona went from pretty much ALWAYS LEGAL FROM FOREVER open carry, to also legal concealed carry with PERMIT AND REGISTERING YOURSELF AS A GUN CARRYING PERSON, to now CONSTITUTIONAL CONCEALED CARRY with no permits, that STILL FUCKS YOU if you EVER LEAVE ARIZONA and don’t have a permit…But the whole COUNTRY could have said “FUCK YOU AND YOUR PERMIT IDEA” in the beginning as RIGHTS ARE NOT PRIVS.
Fair question for the “prag” contingent?
One of the assholes occasionally here called me a blowhard. Maybe that fag can explain to me where I’m wrong.
One of the people married in my family is a democratically elected democrat politician who doesn’t like private gun ownership and thinks some of my friends wouldn’t mind killing him. This scares him, but it also prevents him from trying to take threeper’s guns away…
Ball is FIRMLY in the court of Huffman, Linoge, and Gene on THIS ONE.
Because at the end of the day, if I have the chance to do it, if anybody tries to take my arms I WILL KILL THEM.
End of story on my end.
But an interesting question for people that insult the somewhat “MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION” contingent on my side of the fence that are protecting their right to arms whether they like it or not a lot more than Gura ever did.
Oh, for any prags I offend(ed), Pardon my French:
SE COUCHER AVEC UNE TRUIE.
Consider it a “gauntlet” tossed at rude morons that don’t have much sense of the history of arms law.
Can’t sleep writing theater:
Kurt Hoffman’s Latest Exmainer piece:
“…going back at least as far as United States v. Miller, in 1939, has been just about anything but a staunch champion of the right to keep and bear arms. Even our recent “victories,” in District of Columbia v Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, carry perhaps as much threat to legal gun ownership as affirmation of it, by virtue of having placed no real limit on gun laws short of outright prohibition–essentially (for now, at least) giving such gun laws tacit “Constitutional” approval.”
Hofmann. He’d boot me in the balls, in a metaphorical sense, for spelling his name wrong, as we’re actually friends…Sorry Kurt.