Tit for Tat

From Ladd Everett and Lori O’Neill

@CSGV If gun industry couldn’t arm criminals, how would it scare ordinary people into buying more & more guns?

@GunSensus True. NRA gun laws arm homicid. maniacs like J. Loughner, then gun fanatics say they need 2 be armed 2 defend against these guys

And of course Anti-Rights laws like the ones supported by CSGV and the Brady Campaign (The groups that Everett and O’Neill represent) Kept people like George Hennard, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, Steven Kazmierczak,Sung Cho (Who BTW used two hand guns, and politely waited over a month between buying both guns to comply with Virginia’s “Effective” law), and Dwayne Moore among countless other prohibited people who have committed violent felonies inside of gun-free zones from getting guns and committing violent crimes.

Also thanks to their hard work, New York City’s Central park is a great place for a pick-nick or an evening jog or dog walking after dark.

Reality, they HATE it! Hate it like they hate FREEDOM!

This entry was posted in Guns, Politics, Safety. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Tit for Tat

  1. Greg Camp says:

    Should we call them an echo or a choir? Either way, they’re out of touch and out of tune.

  2. A forgotten fact is that Dylan and Klebold didn’t have firearms as their primary weapon. Their primary choice was explosives. Had they actually tested their explosives properly the death count would have been considerably higher.

    They intended to destroy the support columns that supported the library above the cafeteria. They actually had done research to determine the exact time when there would be the most people in each.

    The only reason that incident became a “gun death” is because their explosives failed. Don’t freaking forget that when they run it up on their pulpit. Guns were their backup to clean up people as they ran from the building (which most of them wouldn’t be if it was successful).

  3. Bubblehead Les says:

    NRA Gun Laws? You mean the NRA is the group responsible for not allowing Congress to allow Reciprocal CCW Laws across the country? That the BRADY BILL should have been called the NRA BILL? That the NRA is the one who issued all those Executive Orders? That the NFA ACT banning Full Auto w/o a License and Tax Stamp is really the NRA ACT? That it was “Heller vs. the NRA” that went to SCOTUS?

    Well, it sounds like to me that I should support the CSGV in their effort to REPEAL all those NRA Laws, right?

    Well, that’s what they just Tweeted, right?

  4. docstrange says:

    Yes, indeed, because it must be the NRA that is intentionally arming criminals.

    Oops.

    http://www.silive.com/news/index.ssf/2012/02/brooklyn_cop_enters_guilty_ple.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *