Weapons of War

Cuomo to exempt police from gun ban:

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s office is working on amendments to clarify the newly passed gun-control law, following complaints that it did not explicitly exempt police officers from a ban on high-capacity magazines.

The state law bans magazines over seven rounds — police officers typically use magazines that hold twice as many bullets. Critics of the law claimed the alleged oversight was a product of the haste with which the package was passed through the legislature.

“This could have been avoided,” Republican Assemblyman Al Graf told FoxNews.com.

However, Cuomo’s office insists police officers are still exempt.

“Police officers possessing ammunition clip with more than seven bullets are not in violation of this law and they never will be, period,” Cuomo spokesman Matthew Wing said.

They keep banning guns and magazines in the name of safety, and claim that certain guns are only useful in violent crimes. Yet police get to own them. What use to police have for them? If you say to fight back against heavily armed criminals. First, how common is that? And Second, why do we have SWAT teams with full military hardware?

The real answer is that police carry guns for the same reason everybody else does. To protect themselves, and others around them. In the event they’re facing a serious fire-fight their sidearms and rifles are to protect themselves until the SWAT team can arrive.

If these are “Weapons of War” that need to be taken off our streets, why are the anti-gun people putting them specifically on the street?

BLNN Logo

This entry was posted in Guns, Safety, Self Defense. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Weapons of War

  1. Joe in PNG says:

    Peel’s Principles? What are those again?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *