Blood Dancing

We saw it in the Santa Barbara killings. The antis heard people had been shot and immediately called it a mass shooting. Later when it was realized that half the people were stabbed to death, they backpedaled and attempted to re-group, focusing only on the people who were shot.

I really think that antis get excited when they read about somebody being shot. They obviously don’t care about the loss of human life, otherwise they wouldn’t be so fixated on “Gun Death”. Also their haste to jump on the issue before the facts are known and the bodies even cool shows that their agenda is above all else.

They NEED the blood and emotions to push their agenda. Guns simply aren’t that big a problem in American society, so when there is no major headlines the if the news covers a gun story it’s a positive light. Guns are fun, guns are interesting, and guns save people’s lives.

When there is blood on the ground that’s when emotions run hot, and that’s when the antis push their agenda. So much that they have to mislead to get the numbers they want.

We’ve talked about this before. The anti’s talk about “School Shootings” because it invokes an image. A deranged student or outsider forcing their way into a school during classroom hours with a “high-Powered” weapon shooting innocent teachers and students with reckless abandon.

Same goes for their topic of “Mass Shooters”, where again a person armed with “High Powered” weapons shoots up an area filled with innocent people.

These events do happen, but they are horrible outliers. If all we had were “School Shootings” and “Mass Shootings” by the heart-string pulling national news standards we would be one of the safest nations in the world. Also your BS alarm should be going off. We have the School Shooting in Portland where a student violated school policy bringing a weapon into school grounds, killing another student, wounding a teacher, then eventually killing himself. That’s one innocent body, and it was national news. If there have been 74 of these, why haven’t we heard of them?

Well there goes the crux, most of the “Mass Shootings” are events like this, gang turf wars in gun control capitals, and the people who are shot are just as dirty as the ones taking the shots. Same with School shootings. Most aren’t during classroom hours, many are only NEAR schools, and some involve criminals involved in criminal acts, others are simple suicides.

They are DESPERATE for blood, so much that they need to be this dishonest about the news. And they claim to be for “Safety”. Really they are for banning guns, and if that means MORE people are killed, the better for their twisted agenda.

This entry was posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Blood Dancing

  1. The_Jack says:

    They’ve also defined the “mass” in mass shooting down to one death.

    This also underscores a big bit of projection. Whenever challenged on the numbers their response is “Oh well I suppose it’s fine if there’s only 15, 7, 2 school shootings!”

    But you know who thought that wasn’t enough school shootings? Bloomberg.

    If Everytown really thought 15 school shootings was 15 too many then they wouldn’t have felt the need to add /dozens/ of extra events.

  2. Eck! says:

    They are running the “One Big Lie” major theme of their propaganda and its quite obvious.
    This has a been a consistent practice from their playbook. They believe and feel that lies
    about “facts”, creating “facts” and inflating events are justified. It is not.

    These principles are abstracted from Jowett & O’Donnell (ca about 1948).
    -Avoid abstract ideas – appeal to the emotions.
    -Constantly repeat just a few ideas. Use stereotyped phrases.
    -Give only one side of the argument.
    -Continuously criticize your opponents.
    -Pick out one special “enemy” for special vilification.

    They play very close to that. I will not mention who’s rules they are.

    Eck!

  3. Jack/OH says:

    Eck, thanks for the reference to Jowett and O’Donnell (“Propaganda and Persuasion”).

    I scanned the Everytown Web site. Expert propaganda. “School shooting” as bait to lure the gun law undecideds into their camp, and goad pro-gun folks into an intemperate response. I’m glad to see some people are already taking down Everytown’s statements.

    Allow me a vent. Many observers, I think, see the Nazis’ propaganda manipulation of the Reichstag fire to extend dictatorial power to Hitler as early evidence of the Party’s unrestrained contempt for law and willingness to instrumentalize anything to gain unchecked power. E. g., as an alternative, the perpetrator could have been tried for arson, Reichstag security beefed up, a government investigative panel could have issued a white paper, etc. The anti-gunners seem to me to have something of the same attitude as the Nazis. “Blood dancing” does seem to me the right phrase.

  4. Pingback: More Tone Deafness and Ignorance | Weer'd World

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *