“Gun Death” Mop Bucket

They taught me this one in health class. Now that I’m a father, I’ve wondered if it’s an urban myth.

A Montana toddler drowned after tipping headfirst into a five-gallon mop bucket, police said today.

Even if it was a myth we keep all bathroom doors closed (which has resulted in a few amusing events between the wife and I) and all toilet lids down. We don’t mop our floors with buckets so that isn’t an issue, and any buckets we do have tend to be kept in the basement or garage where the baby has no access.

My heart goes out to this family, how horrible it must be.

Still their horror and sorrow is ignored by the anti-gun people because it isn’t a USEFUL death. Only “Gun Death” counts, you see!

H/T Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | 1 Comment

“Progressive” Laws

A great video about Jonathan Gruber:

One thing that came to mind was Washington’s i594 Background Check bill. Our side talks about how onerous this law is and how every-day benign gun ownership quickly becomes criminal.

Still the anti-gun side has been LOCKSTEP! i594 is about gun shows and internet sales. Period, full stop. The reason for this is not simplicity, it is NOT their stated goal, it is simply to mislead the public into supporting a bill that does NONE of those things.

This is why we need to constantly have the information war waging!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics | 1 Comment

More Junk Numbers

Man, this report just spins like a top! When the antis have an agenda they will do ANYTHING to cook the numbers to garner support!

Laws in all 50 states permitting people to carry concealed firearms in public have been connected to a rise in violent crimes, according to a new report from researchers at Stanford and Johns Hopkins universities.

The report, published in September and issued as a National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper last week, adds to a series of studies over the last decade tending to discredit the “more guns, less crime” hypothesis, which argues that right-to-carry laws serve as crime deterrents by allowing ordinary Americans to better protect themselves.

The new findings suggest that right-to-carry laws are “associated with substantially higher rates” of aggravated assault, rape and robbery, Stanford law professor John J. Donohue III, one of the study’s three authors, explained in a press release on Friday. Stanford law student Abhay Aneja and Johns Hopkins doctoral student Alexandria Zhang co-authored the report.

Well this goes direly in the face of the numbers presented by the pro-gun side that violent crime is DROPPING while gun laws are being relaxed and more people own guns.

Among violent crimes, the most significant increase came in aggravated assault, which may have risen by nearly 33 percent, according to the report. The researchers also found that from 1999 to 2010, murder rates rose in eight states that adopted right-to-carry laws.

First up, there is no citation of HOW MUCH the murder rate increased, and if it is a raw increase or adjusted for increase in population. The Aggravated Assault numbers are far more interesting. First from the press release the Huff-Po is referencing it reads a LOT different.

The strongest evidence was for aggravated assault, with data suggesting that right-to-carry (RTC) laws increase this crime by an estimated 8 percent – and this may actually be understated, according to the researchers.

Is this a typo? Are they citing directly from the paper that I don’t have access to? Is this like the Kellermann data where the numbers constantly went down every time he was questioned?

Either way from the story:

In 2012, there were nearly 9,000 firearm homicides in the United States. A year earlier, more than 21 percent of an estimated 751,131 aggravated assaults in the nation were committed with firearms.

So 33 Percent, or 8 percent, according to the article only 21 percent of the aggravated assaults use guns, so even if the crime is increasing the “Gun Crime” is DECREASING, making this conclusion enigmatic at best, intentionally dishonest at worse.

Now even with such biased sources they can’t just out-and-out LIE, so the Huff-Po Article closes with this:

The report also “corrected a number of flaws in the data” with new statistical methods, Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, told The Huffington Post.

Based on the new research, Webster concluded that “right-to-carry laws increase firearm-related assaults” — though he noted that “the exact magnitude of that effect is uncertain.”

And the Presser closes with this:

“Different statistical models can yield different estimated effects, and our ability to ascertain the best model is imperfect,” Donohue said, describing this as the most surprising aspect of the study.

He said that many scholars struggle with the issue of methodology in researching the effects of right-to-carry laws. But overall, his study benefits from the recent data.

Donohue suggested it is worth exploring other methodological approaches as well. “Sensitive results and anomalies – such as the occasional estimates that right-to-carry laws lead to higher rates of property crime – have plagued this inquiry for over a decade,” he said.

So yeah, even the guys who wrote this paper aren’t going to hang their hats on it.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Safety | 3 Comments

Images of the Antis: False Argument

They almost sound reasonable if they make the straw man big enough:

False Argument

Now of course the big straw man is somehow the argument for private gun ownership is it is the ONLY way to address grievances for the government. Now I got this from the twitter feed of this brain surgeon so it is very possible she is simply too stupid to see the flaws in the argument. Really she hates guns and gun owners, so parroting an anti-gun graphic might just be her confirmation bias.

Still of course we have the common saying of the fact that there are FOUR boxes for fixing government.

Soap Box: I’m standing on mine right now. I see flaws in the world and the system. I see solutions. I see the dishonesty of the other side, and here I am telling all who will listen, and for all who will continue this message and/or add too it!

Ballot Box: You vote for candidates who support your interests, and vote against those hostile to your interests. This can also be lumped into a fifth box not often talked about in these contexts, the post box. We live in a Republic so our representatives are voting essentially FOR us by proxy. By calling, mailing, or directly addressing representatives about your thoughts on any given issue, you can sway their vote in your favor, knowing that you’ll remember their record come the next election. Further most people understand that we have a Republic, and not a Democracy because people can’t be bothered to run government full-time, so any time they hear from a constituent about an issue, they assume there is a larger number who simply has not contacted them.

Also ballot initiatives can be formed to create or destroy laws by vote.

Jury Box: Sometimes omitted, but not only does it keep the government attacking an individual unjustly by leveling false or embellished charges, but there is also Jury Nullification where unjust laws can be overturned simply by legal precedence.

And always mentioned LAST is the Ammo Box. This is mentioned last because it is a LAST resort. Back when this land was part of the British Empire the people of the Colonies took all of the above steps to address the grievances they had with the British Crown. Turns out a Monarchy is a horrible way to govern a land (Even England doesn’t really use theirs anymore) so to get us released from the Empire we took up arms.

The war was bloody, brutal, and long. After the war it was even worse for the loyalists to the crown who were just as much residents to this land as the Patriots were. Many had to flee, and many were executed. We give a lot of glory to the War of Independence because it formed this great nation, but if it could have been done any other way we would have done that to save the blood and hardship caused by a war.

And of course comes the common canard of the anti-rights cult. They sure do like to drape themselves with the flag and say “I support the Second Amendment” while they express pure contempt to the freedoms we enjoy. No, you don’t have ANY respect for the US Constitution, and don’t go pointing your finger at US!

Lastly there is history. Governments do NOT disarm their people for public safety. There is no evidence this has ever happened. They disarm their people so they can do things to them that they would not do to an armed society.

Part of why this nation has those other “boxes” is because the government does not DARE take them away. You’ll see this discussion in blogs, and more often in forums where people ask “When do we get to start shooting?” The short answer is “Never”, because the triggers for an armed uprising are the government removing one or all of the other “boxes” from the hands of the people. Suspension of elections, rounding up persons without the backing of the law or jury title, or suspension of the 1st Amendment rights to express yourself and gather peacefully.

Now you see why the anti-freedom cult focuses so hard on guns. If we are armed they cannot do these things, but as history shows an unarmed people can easily have these rights stripped by a tyrannical government.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | 2 Comments

“Gun Death” Playground Stabbing

Boys will be boys…but seriously?

A 9-year-old boy was repeatedly stabbed in the back by a 12-year-old boy at a playground, then ran screaming to his western Michigan home and collapsed bleeding on his porch, witnesses and police said Tuesday.

…Witnesses told investigators that four children were playing when one of them, for unknown reasons, pulled a knife and stabbed the boy.

Glen Stacy, who lives nearby, told The Grand Rapids Press that the older boy approached him after the attack and asked to use his phone. He said the boy called 911 to report the attack and turn himself in.

Stacy said he also called police and described the boy as “very calm.”

“The only time he raised his voice was when the police came,” Stacy said.

When police arrived at the mobile home park, they first went to aid the stabbing victim, but the older boy wanted the officers to pick him up and yelled, “‘Hello, I’m right here. You’re going the wrong way,'” Stacy said.

The motive in the attack was still being investigated, Kentwood Police Chief Thomas Hillen said.

I can’t even fathom why this happened. It’s so messed up, and horrible. Yet no gun was used. I thought only “Gun Death” was what we should be concerned about?

H/T Wallphone and

BLNN Logo

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Images of the Antis: Is it Accurate?

One of the interesting things about the anti vs. Pro-Gun view is both sides are talking about the same thing. We’re both talking about public safety. Pro-gun people claim that allowing people the proper tools of self defense turns the tide against the violent element, and rather than the end-result being a shootout total war, instead leads to the violent element choose a less confrontational mode of crime.

The anti-gunners claims that guns are the root of violence, and by banning guns you can’t ban violence entirely, but without guns you’ll have less violence, and the violence you’ll have will be less deadly.

Both sides have their facts and statistics, and they are universally contradictory. Both sides take the facts with a grain of salt, or better yet (at least on the pro-gun side) tear the stats apart and show why they’re bogus.

That leads me to this:

CSGV Violence

Now let’s just start with the open assertion given here. So CSGV is claiming that around FIVE TIMES the homicides in America are NOT gang related, and not related to the commission of felony activities?

So let’s just dive into our collective personal experiences. First up, is where you live a place that has much gang activity? If not, do you have many homicides at all? Now if you live in a low-homicide area, think of the nearest place that is known to be dangerous. Are there a lot of gangs and gang activity in that area.

For me it is, no, no gangs here, and no we have a relatively low homicide rate. There are a few cities nearby (most notably Boston) where there IS a violent crime problem, and yes Boston is maggoty with gangs, especially in the neighborhoods where people wind up dead.

So yeah, this image seems to be pure bullshit. But how did they get it? I imagine its purely on what the prosecutors can charge. Do they KNOW that killer X is involved in a gang? Maybe not. Can they prove that the killing was gang-related? Also probably not without a confession. Also remember “snitches get stitches”, so ratting out your local gang boss will get you killed while still in prison, and probably get your family members harmed as a message.

Hey, but let’s just give up our rights because some nutbag anti-gun person made a graph!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Safety | 5 Comments

Play Me Out: Guilty Pleasure

Yeah, I’m a classically trained musician with a wide taste in music and musicians. Still sometimes a crappy song gets me too!

There is NOTHING special about this song. The lyrics are lame, the music is repetitive and simple, but I’ll be damned if the breathy vox and catchy synth hook doesn’t get me.

I like it, and that’s all I can say about that.

Posted in Music | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Mercy Killing

This is a sad one:

A 90-year-old Ohio man has been sentenced to four years in prison for killing his wife of 65 years — but he could be released after serving six months.

**KILLER** from the Cleveland suburb of Avon was originally charged with aggravated murder for smothering his 84-year-old wife, **VICTIM**, in November 2008. He pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in June as part of a plea deal.

While the law says what it says, I have to put the bad justice tag on this one. Not because justice wasn’t served, but that the law is flawed. This man was married to this woman for SIXTY-FIVE YEARS! This isn’t some troubled marriage or insurance fraud crap, the man is 90, and even 4 months might be a death sentence for him…even 4 months with NO sentence might be his last days. He had NOTHING to gain from this crime except mercy for a wife who was suffering.

I’ve lost several relatives to terminal illness, and when I knew they were suffering my feeling to find out they had passed was RELIEF! It’s bitter-sweet, but when somebody you love is suffering, and you KNOW the only end is death, you hope, if not WISH that it finds them sooner rather than later.

The fact that when our pets have such a condition where they will not recover, and they are suffering, we have them euthanized so they can die quickly, painlessly, and with dignity. Why can’t our human loved ones have the same option. ESPECIALLY when they can consent to it?

Of course no gun was used either, but that almost seems moot to my larger points…

BLNN Logo

Posted in Bad Justice, Gun Death? | 1 Comment

Tonight On The Squirrel Report!

You dumb fucking fucks who don’t want Socialism!

Texas Carry Politics.

Knives More Deadly than Rifles!

And how the government can and will fuck up EVERYTHING, including the Internet!

All that and More, on tonight’s SQUIRREL REPORT! Join us by calling 214-530-0036 at 9pm EST!

ChipmunkReport

Chipmunks are NUTS!!!

Posted in Podcast, Politics | 1 Comment

Images of the Antis: Stupid

Sorry antis you can’t have it both ways!

You can’t be completely ignorant of guns, gun laws, and physics in general AND be advocates on how easy it is to side-step such-and-such a law.

Of course this what the antis WANT for a following. First up owning guns is a black mark on you, it’s maybe forgivable if you only hunt, and not every year. Second shooting or knowing anything about guns is a mortal sin to the antis. Third the talking points state that semi-auto firearms are “Easily Converted” to full auto, so why would they NOT believe that.

If they had an educated following who understood how guns worked, and were abreast in the current gun laws, they would be pro-gun.

I should know!

Posted in Guns, Politics | 11 Comments