Just For Fun

Anti gun Surgeon General will likely never get appointed:

The post of the surgeon general has been vacant since July, and it looks likely to remain that way for some time thanks to a strident campaign led by the National Rifle Association and libertarian Senator Rand Paul against President Obama’s nominee, Dr. Vivek Murthy.

Murthy has medical and business degrees from Yale, works as an attending physician and instructor at Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Harvard Medical School and has founded several health businesses and nonprofits. He has also expressed support for limited gun safety measures like a ban on assault weapons, mandatory safety training and limits on ammunition, and so the NRA has declared it will “score” his confirmation vote, putting pressure on Senate Democrats running tight re-election races in red states to block Murthy’s confirmation. As The New York Times reported on Saturday, the White House is “recalibrating” its strategy towards Murthy’s nomination, meaning the Senate vote will either be delayed or never happen.

But but Michael Bloomberg can Out-spend the NRA!!!!!!

Posted in Guns, Politics | 2 Comments

Interesting Take on the Malaysian Flight

I personally think the plane landed in Sri Lanka, to be turned into a human-shield filled cruise missile, but that’s just my pet theory.

Posted in Freedom | 1 Comment

The Republican Party Now Knows I’ve Left

Just got a letter in the mail. Quote:

This is to inform you we have received your affidavit of voter registration and have taken the following action:

-Your party affiliation has been changed from REPUBLICAN to UNENROLLED

This was a long time coming. When I changed my residency from Maine to Massachusetts they let me register to vote. Given that I knew Massachusetts was maggoty with Democrats, and I still had faith in the Republican party, I signed up for the Mass GOP.

Then there was 8 years of Bush, and the foundation of the Homeland Security act and the TSA. There were the years of Mitt Romney. There were the surprisingly BETTER years under Deval Patrick. Turns out a stupid authoritarian will fuck you less than a smart one.

The big blow was Scott Brown, I donated to his election campaign in 2010, I’ll probably never give to ANY candidate of any party ever again thanks to that turncoat asshole.

The sealing deal was 2012 where my major choice was four more years of Barack Obama, or electing Willard Mitt Romney. I voted for Gary Johnson, who would have made an Amazing president, and knew that he wouldn’t win. Give me the choice of four more years of Obama, and 4-8 of Romney, I’ll take Obama, thanks.

So on Tuesday I was running errands with LaWeer’da and our course took us right past city hall. We swung by the town clerk who was enamored with my cute baby, and I withdrew myself from the Republican party.

The nice part of Unenrolled in Massachusetts is I can now vote in any primary I want to, I just have to pick one per election. So even if I was still a Republican, I would have more power to vote.

But I’m not a Republican. I used to be for sending in the troops…but what has that got us? Lots of wounded vets, and shithole nations just as shitty. I used to think the Republicans were for freedom, but turns out they’re soft on guns, and hard for men in blue gloves touching my penis, and spooks listening to my phone calls.

Then there’s their strategy for winning elections. Pick the least conservative candidate and watch them lose. Hell the only reason why George W. Bush won a second term was because John Kerry is such a lightweight. Hell he’s such a lightweight that he makes Barack Obama look like a Heavyweight!

I’ve always been pro-gay, and against the war on drugs, both are vestiges of my “Progressive” days. Turns out that platform is right…well given that the Democrats aren’t actually VOTING for gay rights or to legalize drugs…

Really I tell people I don’t follow Massachusetts sports because Massachusetts politics are much more interesting. I guess that sports mentality lead me to believe that I should be rooting for one team.

I was wrong, and now I’m done with that shit.

I couldn’t feel better!

Posted in Politics | 6 Comments

More SWAT Stupidity

Wow this story is really pissing me off!

Police surrounded a man’s home with sharpshooters and armed troopers and demanded his surrender through a megaphone after someone saw a tattoo of a gun on his stomach.

Michael Smith works the night shift and sleeps during the day. On the morning of March 18th, he was disturbed when he heard a loud racket in his front yard. It was a tree removal service backing into his driveway preparing to chopping branches around power lines.

Mr. Smith groggily stepped outside in his pajama pants to tell the tree trimmers to come back another time. They told him it was not a problem, reported the Morning Sentinel.

The only problem was that one of the workers saw Smith’s stomach tattoo and perceived it to be a real gun. Even though no threats had been made, the worker called police to report a “man with a gun.”

It should be noted that it is not a crime openly wear a handgun in the waistband in Maine. At home or in public; shirtless or clothed; quiet or shouting; open carry is a recognized right in that state and no justification for police intervention.

I’ll add to this. Back in the 90s a man took his family to a public festival in Portland. He was openly carrying a pistol. An officer confronted him about the pistol, and the man pointed out he had every right to carry it. The officer then requested the man disarm and stow the gun in his vehicle. The man refused. IIRC the Chief of Portland Police was also at the Festival, one “Media” Mike “Shitwood” Chitwood (the first nickname was coined by himself for his love of doing TV liveshots rather than actual REAL police work, the latter was given to him by the recipients of many of the prosecuted excessive force cases, and the number of people who got their liquor licenses suspended because Portland’s bar district turned into the wild west at night because Chitwood didn’t seem to think that an area filled with bars and drunks needed a police presence, and instead just needed less lawful commerce). Chitwood seized the man’s pistol and told him to pick it up the next day at Portland PD. The man did, wearing a different pistol this time, and later served Portland PD with a lawsuit for illegal seizure of property. He won and Portland paid a hefty sum in the judgement.

Since then Maine has been VERY friendly to Open carry because its very painful to the public coffers to harass law abiding citizens.

Now let’s go a little further, this town of Norridgewock is just outside of Skowhegan Maine. Back when I was freshly graduated I interviewed for a biology position at a local fish hatchery. This town is WAYYY off the beaten path. After the formal interview I was taking a tour of the facility and was asking my guide what it was like to live there. His response was “If you like hunting and fishing, you’ll love it here!”

I’m still kind of bummed I didn’t get the job, it would have been rough on my relationship with Mrs. Weer’d who was just my girlfriend at the time, but it was PRETTY up there, and I do like hunting and fishing!

Still this is rural Maine, EVERYBODY here has a gun. This call to the police should have gone like this:

“I saw a man with a gun!”

“Was he pointing it at you or acting threateningly?

“No he just had it stuck in the front of his pants?”

“Oh, well grow up, Cupcake!” **CLICK**

I mean there’s nothing even RESEMBLING a crime in the report.

Turns out this guy has a LOT of unfortunate tattoos, looks like a cheezy flame-job on his right forearm, and a bunch of Nazi Eagles and Iron Crosses on his left upper arm, but he also has what appears to be a Beretta 92 tattooed in an appendix carry position. He also looks like Larry Correia’s long-lost Nazi-Brother. (BTW if any of you do the twitter thing, tweet that picture to Larry, I bet he’ll get a kick out of it)

Still why all the hoopla? It wasn’t the gun, EVERYBODY in that town owns at least one. I’m not sure how often people open carry there, but I guarantee people open carry there, plus with all the hunting, its probably not uncommon to see hunters carrying their rifles and shotguns during appropriate seasons.

If he was making threats or acting in a threatening way, I could see that, but wouldn’t the sheriff want to let the media know about that part?? Its possible with his Nazi tattoos he’s pissed off a few cops before. There’s always a nut in every town, and sometimes the cops roust them just to let them know they won’t take any shit. Still I think the big reason why is this:

In rural Maine they can’t get much call to break out the rifles and the ninja-gear, and LOOK at all the expensive shit hanging off that M4!

This strikes me as a budget justification, and an unarmed, nonthreatening man got REAL guns pointed at him because he has a dumb tattoo!

SWAT teams are the standing armies our founding fathers warned us about!

BLNN Logo

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety | 10 Comments

Traveling at the Speed of Smell!!

Ok this is a really cool article!

Scientists in Florida studying the way lobsters sniff around for food on the sea floor say they have found a clue to developing technology that could help soldiers detect landmines and hidden explosives from a safer distance than current technology allows.

A lobster’s “nose” is actually a pair of hairy antennules that capture odor molecules that settle on the hairs and help the creatures locate an odor, researchers at the University of Florida said.

They are studying an olfactory neuron that emits bursts of electrical pulses, much like radar systems use pulses of radio energy to detect airplanes or thunderstorms.

…For a lobster, each bursting neuron responds to a whiff at a different frequency, according to Barry W. Ache, a distinguished professor of neuroscience and biology and director of the University of Florida’s Center for Smell and Taste.

Sensing the time between whiffs helps the lobster pinpoint the source, Ache said.

Computer modeling of the lobster olfactory cells helped the team understand how a lobster was extracting and processing information from the environment, Principe said.

Now to stay in the Marine Environment, they taught us in dive class to always be aware of our buddies, and when you hear a noise, like somebody rapping their knife against their tank, or shouting into their regulator, you’ll need to do a full 180 to find them. The reason is we hear direction because the sound hits one ear before the other. The time it takes between the two ears lets us know exactly where the sound comes from. This doesn’t just give you left vs. Right, but can also tell you where it is in 3D space. Now under water sound travels much faster because water is dense. This means that the sound travels too fast for your ears to distinguish where its coming from, and the sensation is the sound is coming from EVERYWHERE. The human ear just doesn’t sample sound fast enough to get direction sense. Now marine animals don’t have this issue because their biology samples sound faster than we do.

Now onto smell. Humans SUCK as smelling stuff. We can DETECT and identify scents, but using it to locate something is nearly impossible. One because our sense of smell sucks, but also because while we’re gathering data about the smell it fills our scent receptors and the smell appears to fade or vanish.

We’ve all done it, walk into a room, like the kitchen and you smell something bad. Is it the garbage disposal? Is it the trash? Is it something that got dropped on the floor? We don’t know, and it usually takes a few sweeps, often by leaving the room and letting your nose clear itself, then re-entering before you can locate what stinks.

Seems lobsters have bumped up the resolution of their smell, like how dolphins have bumped up the resolution of how fast their ears process sound.

VERY cool!

H/T C-90

Posted in Biology | 1 Comment

Debt Culture

Tam has a great post up about this picture:

Robb also is talking about it:

If either of my daughters takes a picture like the one posted at Tam’s, I’ve failed as a father, unless the dollar amounts were $0.

We’re teaching both of the girls that debt is not something to take on lightly. I’m not 100% against debt no matter how ‘Dave Ramsey’ I get from time to time. The problem is we go in debt for stupid shit like a new TV, a fancier cellphone, clothes, etc.

I have a mortgage, and a car payment (ok not really on that one, its 0% interest, and we have the money that pays the monthly dues, I’ll earn interest while this car depreciates! Its the last return I’ll ever see from it!) but overall I, and my wife have lead a very anti-debt life.

I got my first credit card when I was 17, and was instructed by my father to NEVER charge for anything my bank account couldn’t back up. For all my Dad’s “Progressive” leanings he’s VERY fiscally conservative with HIS money. Before he went in for Knee replacement surgery, his fellow teachers gave him a gift of a picture of him holding fistful of dollar bills from a school dance with the caption “How much for a Knee?” and his perennial quote that I guess the teachers heard as much as I did growing up “If you can’t buy it with cash, you can’t afford it!”

Back when Deval Patrick got elected governor there was a lot of talk of gun bans, so I made a few panic buys of some guns that were on my wish-list and their future purchase was dubious. I ended up letting one of the guns I bought ride on my credit card for a single month. ONE MONTH, and I was mortified that I had to do that. I couldn’t buy that with cash, so I really couldn’t afford it. Of course I paid it off with the interest of IIRC $17, but that’s not how I like to roll.

I don’t remember what that gun was, I think it was whatever I bought after I got my SKS, which I payed for with a stack of $20s. I do know I had just spent my fun-money when I saw my Beretta 21A at the gun shop. I actually walked out of the shop, knowing that this is not an “approved” pistol, so its not like I can just ORDER one from the factory, or that you see them very often in the rack. I didn’t have the cash to buy it, so I couldn’t afford it. I ended up calling the shop the next morning as soon as they opened (I actually called twice since the first time nobody was there to answer the phone) and had them hold it for me. I paid off most of it that month and the rest the following.

The fact that this little snowflake has $17,000 in credit card dept, likely all frivolous crap she didn’t need, obviously didn’t have the cash for. Hey but MAGIC MONEY! I mean you swipe the card and they give you shit! Its YOURS right?

Hell I even gulp when I say that I own my house. Technically I own it, I pay taxes on the damn thing, and I LIVE here, and we’re easily making the monthly payments, but still the bank has the title.

My wife got buried with some credit card debt in her first year of college. Her Mom bailed her out with the stern statement that it would be the very LAST time she did such a thing. My wife, unlike me, has NEVER carried a balance since.

Like Robb, if my daughter EVER posts a picture like this, or a lament about being buried in BS debt I will have failed as a father!

Posted in Politics | 11 Comments

A Real Discussion on Violence in America

So this weekend the Globe had a story up on two “reformed” thugs trying to help stop gang violence in Massachusetts.

I generally dislike these stories because often you’ll hear that the thugs are still committing crimes, and they’re using their philanthropic goals as a way to avoid unwanted police contact. Plus I just dislike gangs in general.

Still mixed into the story was a little pull-back of the curtain.

While gangs have been around for decades, they’ve been spending less time hanging on street corners in recent years as the FBI has stepped up arrests.

To attract less attention, gangs have focused less on fighting and more on making money. Most of it comes from selling drugs and guns, said Nardone.

…While Framingham gangs still focus on drug dealing and gun running, prostitution is now an added way for them to make money, said Pomales of the Framingham police.

His department is now working with local motels and hotels to try to have managers better screen people who buy up blocks of rooms. He said gangs use websites such as Craigslist and Backpage to link customers with prostitutes.

“Gangs have been around for ages,” Pomales said. “It’s about making money.”

Now let’s look at that. Making money is the key driving force of gangs. There is some other things, like giving “Families” to people who really don’t have anything resembling that, and just the fun and thrilling life of a gang member that is attractive to many young boys and me.

Still Money is the big one. Not only does it put food on the table and afford members creature comforts, but the flashy cars, clothes, and jewelry associated with “Thug Culture” are very attractive to poor people in the inner cities.

What makes them money? Guns, Drugs, and prostitutes. Why do they make a lot of money? They’re illegal! The risk of prosecution and the cost of running a business underground out of the eye of Johnny Law means prices can be inflated.

Further given that the drugs and prostitutes are 100% illegal, and what they are essentially doing is running a business, they can’t do all the fun things business owners do in our modern society. Somebody steals from you, fails to make payments, or otherwise violates our agreed trade laws you can contact the police or the courts.

Gang’s can’t do that as the police will just put them in jail. So they need guns. Somebody steals from you, you kill them. Somebody attempts to compete with your business, you kill them. Somebody fails to make payment on goods and services, you kill them.

Rival gangs are at war not because they’re evil savages, but because they’re competing enterprises operating outside the law. Wal Mart and Target need to compete with each other in goods and services. Do you think if the police were openly hostile to Wal Mart and Target they wouldn’t just burn down each other’s stores, or kill their employees so nobody could stock the shelves?

There is only so much capital in a given moment to go around, and you’d like the capital to go to your business, and not the other guy’s. Inside the law, companies have to lower prices, offer better goods, or make their stores better to shop at. I choose Target over Wal Mart because I hate shopping in Wal Mart’s stores. The prices are higher at Target, but to me its worth it. To others they prefer Wal Mart, so goes the free market, and right now both stores run a VERY healthy business.

With gangs they don’t have to play by any rules because THEIR game is against the rules from the word “go”! So they can offer bad goods, bad services, at high prices, and just KILL the other guy, and its actually cheaper and easier that way. Add in “Snitches get stitches” as their from of Omerta, and it makes policing these illegal acts very difficult.

Of course the end result is horrible violent crime, and dangerous inner cities. This is where our violent crime problem comes from. If you eliminated the gangs, violent crime in America would drop to statistical noise levels.

How do you solve this? Take away their money. What happened to the Capone gang after prohibition was ended? Well it still existed, and many members went on to shining careers as politicians, but they were fucking us with laws rather than with stolen tommy guns!

Frankly I’m not scared of drugs or prostitution. Hell prostitution should be a no-brainer. Give them legal ways to ply their trade, set rules against harmful conduct and disease spreading, and let them work in a safe environment. Its just sex in the end, and all of us have it without any ill effects, why should the exchange of money be a big deal?

Drugs are a little different, as they DO do harm. Still its not like junkies are uncommon, or they’re dissuaded because drugs are illegal. Now look at what illegal drugs get us. Town SWAT teams. Laws that whittle away at the 4th Amendment. Failed states in Mexico and South America. Gang Violence. Overflowing Prisons. Money Laundering. Drugs that are laced with poison, or are of unknown strength causing overdoses.

I think America would be a scary place when you could buy heroin at any drug store…but it would be a LOT less scary than gang violence and the war on drugs!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety | 2 Comments

“Progressives” And Straw Men

I was thinking of making this a Quote of the Day, and I’m glad I waited to expand on it.

Another interesting thing: Antis are really, really bad at “Red Team Thinking”.
They really have a hard time understanding or considering the pro-gun position.

This is where subject ignorance and stressing of emotion over logic really becomes a weakness.

And it’s telling that the average gunnie can explain the anti-gun position better than the anti-gunner.

Jack has it right. While the linked article was probably one of the best-written anti-gun rebuttals I’ve ever seen, even in my first skim my thoughts were “Oh man I can tear this argument apart!”

Now also expand on HOW I got to reading that article. I spend about as much time reading anti-gun articles as pro-gun ones. I found that article on Joan Peterson’s twitter feed. The other article I mentioned in that post was ALSO found and delivered by Joan.

If you don’t read anti-gun writings, you should ask yourself “WHY?”.

Hell there might be an off chance they get something right. Technically Anti-Gunners and Pro-Gunners are on the same side. We both claim to want to make our nation a safer place! Second it helps us get inside their head, see what motivates them, and see what angles they are attacking us from.

The attack side is the simplest. You read the latest anti-gun talking point or sound byte, and come up with a counter argument, then keep that in your back pocket for the next time it crops up when you’re talking with people. A strong defense is a good offense. If they can never achieve their goals our struggle becomes a war of attrition where we can slowly make in-roads while they are powerless to defeat us.

Still wars of attrition are the worst wars, and the same goes with political struggles. Why ride down the slippery slope slip-by-slip when you can make REAL progress?

Hence why you get into their heads. See what they’re saying, see what they’re demanding, see what they’re wishing for, and put that all together. Antis WISH for a safer America, but we can counter that we’re LIVING in a safer America with less gun control and more armed citizens. They don’t like that counter, because I personally believe they only care about banning guns, and safety is just a tool they’re using to gain that goal. Still the hard-line true-believer anti-gun activists are VERY few. If these are the ONLY people we have to deal with, then our fight is essentially over. No the rational people who support gun control DO care about safety, and they DO care about the other talking points the antis bring up.

Its true, “Gun sales with no questions asked”, “Military-Style Assault Weapons with no purpose other than killing”, and “High Capacity Magazine Clips”, are ALL very scary-sounding, and they get people’s attention.

Of course WE are ACTUALLY talking about the ability to sell your own property without having to involve a third party demanding your time and money. Also said sales are still subject to federal law and criminal charges to an illegal transfer. I’ll remind all that a bill was presented to allow non-FFL holders to run NICS checks on their own without involving the time and resources of a gun shop, and without any fear of a back-door registry. The Anti-Gun people HATED it.

We aren’t talking about “Military-Style Weapons”, because frankly most firearms from Grand-pa’s bolt-action deer gun, to any slide-action shotgun, to any pistol or revolver from the match-lock to modern plastic guns, and even some rather tiny CCW type pistols have seen action in military fire-fights and have been in the hands and holsters of soldiers guarding posts. Further guns like the Barret M82 and the Armalite AR-15 were designed as civilian sporting rifles first, and modified and/or adopted for military use at a later date. Also “High capacity” magazines somehow aren’t an issue when the cop walked up to your car door when he pulls you over for speeding with 6 17-round Glock 17 magazines on his belt, but they’re scary when I have one sitting in my gun safe?

And we can argue if your AR-15 is a gun for killing, target shooting, hunting, or just a collector’s piece, but since we, and any other nation I can think of, has laws where you can legally kill another human being for self-protection, or protection of others, there’s good cause for having a gun “designed only for killing”.

You may not be able to turn the average person who doesn’t like guns into Ted Nugent with these counter-arguments, but you can certainly clip the bloom off the rose of gun control if the person you’re talking to has any interest in listening.

Now this “Red Team” mentality of the “Progressives” isn’t just for guns!

Look at that sketch! It is CHOCK full of straw-men! First up, most activists, no matter what cause, aren’t so easily duped as this straw-man, second ironic that the “supportive” girl-friend was Hispanic. You know, that block of people who make our Catholics look like middle-school atheists trying to piss off their religious parents. You think a real Hispanic lady would be THAT concerned about an abortion mill? Hell do you think she’d be all that concerned with people getting contraception?

“Progressives” live in their own little world, and in that world they claim to defy the laws of physics and nature so that when they “Argue” with the other side they’re right!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics | 13 Comments

The Safety of Nations

This is one thing I love about the blogging community. Somebody puts up a post, somebody else reads it and expands on what they said, and in the end we have more knowledge and power.

So Sean read this post, and then wrote his own post. Go have a look!

Sean saw the linked graph where cherry-picked nations have lower “Gun Death” than America. I noted that Mexico was included in the list, but intentionally excluded because it has over TWICE the “Gun Death” rate of the United States, yet it has MASSIVELY restrictive gun laws, far more than many of the other cited nations that have lower “Gun Death”.

Sean then just went and tossed ALL nations with their “Gun Death” numbers and it shows we’re not actually that bad. Further it shows the futility of gun control to reduce “Gun Death”. Also there are a TON of nations in there that I’m not sure I would qualify as “Undeveloped”. Sure a lot of these nations are poorer than the United States, but we’re one of the wealthiest nations in the world, so that seems like a skewed point of view. Further the Average American owns their own home, and has two cars. Does this mean the American than rents a two-bedroom and owns one older car is eating their young and sacrificing their neighbor’s cat to their pagan gods?

Of course not.

Next up Sean steps back from “Gun Death” and puts up Intentional Homicide rates…you know because killed is killed, tools used in the killing are irrelevant. Further he chooses “Intentional Homicide” because “Murder” has varied definitions depending on the nations.

Turns out we’re pretty safe, and a lot of the places more dangerous are places we take our families on vacation.

Sean also has a post up comparing US and Canada on Murder rates. Canada IS indeed a safer nation than the United States, it always has been, even when both countries didn’t care if you owned guns or not, still the graph shows that the antis fear-mongering is a bit overblown.

Good stuff!

Posted in Gun Death?, Politics, Safety | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Blind Cords

This story from Australia:

Australian parents have been warned to take necessary precautions after another toddler has died due to blind cord strangling, the second in just a week’s time.

It seems Australia has the same safety regulations on blinds as we do here, still children are dying.

But its not a “Gun Death”, so simply look away!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment