Sean Penn: The “Progressive” View on Gun Owners

So the world is talking about Sean Penn and his guns:

Anderson Cooper hosted the evening and gave the night’s biggest donation: His auction bid of $1.4 million won a sculpture to be made by artist Jeff Koons from Penn’s 65 discarded firearms.

Sixty-five discarded firearms, you say? What necessitated such a gun dump, you ask?

Apparently the idea to get rid of all of his guns was that of his new girlfriend, South African actress Charlize Theron.

“A strong woman who happens to be from South Africa” convinced Penn to unload his weapons, Penn said at the gala, according to E! Online.

Theron has a tragic history when it comes to gun violence. She was just 17 when her mother shot and killed her father after he reportedly fired his own gun and threatened to kill her.

“Being provoked by this aforementioned strong woman and considering how liberating of bulls**t and ugliness it would be not only get rid of the guns I have in the continental United States but also to destroy them, Jeff Koons and I had a chat the other day,” Penn said. “The highest bidder gets every single one of my guns put in the hands of this iconic artist and sculptor…Koons will decommission [and] render inactive all of my cowardly killing machines.”

OK first up, Penn owns 65 guns? I don’t even think Jay owns that many!

And who is Penn? Why a Marxist “Progressive” with a violent history.

The relationship was marred by violent outbursts against the press, including one incident for which he was arrested for assaulting a photographer on a film set; Penn was sentenced to 60 days in jail in mid-1987, of which he served 33 days.[15] Later in the marriage, Penn was charged with felony domestic assault, a charge for which he pleaded to a misdemeanor.[16] Penn and Madonna divorced in 1989.

Despite these criminal charges that should disqualify him from owning guns, let alone get a may-issue California Carry Permit, he got one!

Penn admitted to using marijuana 20 years ago and had a couple of arrests for assault and driving recklessly, factors that could have disqualified him for a permit for carrying a concealed weapon. In this case, however, Penn got FBI and state Department of Justice clearance and completed firearms training early last year.

Then, earlier this month, someone stole Penn’s car with the guns inside while Penn was at a Berkeley restaurant. The car was recovered — but the guns are still out there.

You see rich “Progressives” live under different standards than us plebeians!

Still the greater points besides his apparent criminal ownership of guns, and negligence by the FBI clearing him.

Charlize Theron is so low down that she’d let Penn chuck his meat in her?

Of course I guess her shitty family life might be to blame….but she appears to have some issues, as her Mom saved her life with a gun…so she hates guns???

Also by Penn describing guns as “cowardly killing machines”, is he calling his girlfriend’s heroic and hard-luck Mom a coward???

This story would be good if I actually belied that violent and hateful Penn was destroying ALL his guns, but he’ll probably keep a few to do something stupid.

Still “cowardly killing machines”, yet Penn just beats people up, and hasn’t killed anybody…but he is a coward.

The big takeaway is that “Progressives” always claim that gun owners are violent cowards itching to harm innocent people with their guns. This is ONLY true if the gun owner himself is a “Progressive”.

BLNN Logo

Posted in Bad Justice, Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Empty Threat

So this little comment is getting a lot of talk:

Movie producer Harvey Weinstein announced for the first time on Howard Stern’s radio show that he is making a full feature drama to try to destroy the National Rifle Association.

Mr. Stern asked Mr. Weinstein on Wednesday whether he owned a gun. The Hollywood heavyweight replied that he did not and never would. “I don’t think we need guns in this country. And I hate it,” the producer said. “I think the NRA is a disaster area.”

Mr. Weinstein then revealed his secret project about the gun rights group. “I shouldn’t say this, but I’ll tell it to you, Howard,” he said. “I’m going to make a movie with Meryl Streep, and we’re going to take this head-on. And they’re going to wish they weren’t alive after I’m done with them.”

The shock jock asked whether the film was going to be a documentary. Mr. Weinstein said no, that it would be a “big movie like a ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.’”

So Weinstein is going to make a movie that will destroy the NRA? It needs to be a work of fiction, as Bowling For Columbine did little damage and that was BEFORE it spawned dozens of rebuttals in print, blogs, and documentaries. (The best of which is Michael Moore is a Big Fat Stupid White Man by somebody you might know)

So to make a “Documentary” against the NRA Moore had to lie, and lie hard with hacking up speeches to make different ones, and post-production trickery.

As far as fictitious attacks on the NRA there was the movie “Runaway Jury”. In the book it was a Tobacco lawsuit, but when “The Insider” was produced the studio decided to attack a different “Progressive” Boogie Man, the Gun Industry.

Of course the shadowy organization funding a defense against a shady gun dealer was never named as the NRA or any specific gun maker. Either way it sparked no political action or interest, but it did spawn this tongue-in-cheek blog post.

Last I’ll touch on this:

Mr. Stern pointed out the inconsistencies in Mr. Weinstein’s earlier comments about a project about Jews defending themselves during the Holocaust. The producer replied that the justification for using a gun is “when you’re marching a half of a million people into Auschwitz.”

Mr. Weinstein does not seem to know that the Nazis were able to confiscate the guns that the Jewish people owned based on Germany’s government registry.

Also, the producer said he would have used a gun to stop from going to a concentration camp if he “found a gun, and if that was happening to my people.”

Mr. Weinstein has been watching too many movies if he thinks the good guys find fully loaded firearms in convenient locations to use only when necessary.

Talk about fiction! I’ve had many people not sympathetic or understanding of self defense or the 2nd Amendment ask me why I NEED guns, or a certain type of gun, or why I carry a gun to a certain place, or at all.

While my answer COULD rightfully be “The Second Amendment says nothing about NEED!” I prefer to point out that I don’t NEED any of my guns right now. Which is 100% true. But I point out that it is not unreasonable to think a person WOULD need a gun, be it street crime, home invasion, or the more serious civil unrest by Hurricane Andrew, Hurricane Katrina, or the LA Riots, or more sinister things like hostile government, or erroneous SWAT raids.

When those things happen you WILL NOT be able to get a gun unless you already have one, so prospectively speaking I NEED them right now.

Weinstein’s idea that if the forces of evil come after him he’ll magically be able to get a gun, or hire the crack dealers in the ghetto to become his personal Feudal army?

I don’t know if its laughable or just sad.

Either way, my general attitude is “BRING IT ON!” Most movies with pointed political agendas as strong as that do VERY poorly in the box office, and generally the subject matter is so dated that home video sales are even worse.

I just hope that as wealthy as Mr. Weinstein and Ms. Streep are, that they call out to anti-gun groups and “Progressive” PACs to get some additional funding, that way it not only sinks like a stone, but does so with the treasures of the enemies of freedom locked in its hold.

In a day of blogs, and a pro-gun community so willing to discuss the issue, I can’t imagine this being anything but an empty threat from a man who is obviously reality-challenged.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Movies, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | 7 Comments

Daddy Blogging

I may have read your blog today while also watching this:

Sleeping Baby

She doesn’t like to nap alone, so I get tied down from time-to-time!

Wouldn’t trade it for anything!

Posted in Family and Friends | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Axe Death

Those who tout “Gun Death” like to talk about mental health screening:

A Phoenix father whom police say believed his son was a demon and planned to eat him has confessed to killing the boy with an ax, police said.

When I bought my house I suddenly had a yard to care for, and no axes of my own. So I bought a maul for splitting wood, and as a sledge hammer, and a landscape axe for chopping and cutting up hard ground. Bought them without a hint of background check or proof of age, and the pair set me back less than $50.

Common sense, huh?

H/T JB and

BLNN Logo

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Light Blogging Ahead

So today is my first full day of Solo-Daddy work!

I’m on leave from work, and the Mrs. is back to full-time working. I suspect it’ll take me a day or two to get my grove set with this baby.

Also I’d like to thank all the people who have been sending me “Gun Death?” Files entries, they fell off a bit right around when LaWeer’da entered the scene, and now they seem to be back to the peak of where it was, and I’m grateful, as it will keep the blog going when I don’t have much time to devote to it.

So stand by, I will blog when I can, but right now I have a pretty demanding boss!

DSCN0684

Posted in Blogging, Family and Friends | 4 Comments

“Gun Death” Love Triangle

I think this is a misuse of the term “Polyamorous”.

She was brought to Jamaica Hospital Medical Center last week by a couple who said they had found her near death, lying on Sutphin Boulevard nearby. According to the police, they said she had been shot in the head.

Little by little their story unraveled. The husband and wife who bundled her battered body into a 2001 Chrysler Town and Country were no serendipitous passers-by; they had been living with Ms. Outerbridge in a polyamorous — and, friends said, brutal and controlling — relationship that, law enforcement officials contend, ended when the couple beat Ms. Outerbridge to death.

Doesn’t sound like love to me. Also isn’t a “Gun Death” so the brutality of this story will be overlooked by the anti-rights fiends!

H/T Whipped Cream difficulties

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Japan Takes Big Steps in the Liquor World

This is a pretty big story for liquor drinkers:

Japanese family-owned drinks firm Suntory is to buy the US beverage group Beam Inc, the company behind the Jim Bean bourbon brand.

Under the deal, worth $16bn (£9.7bn) in all, Suntory will pay $13.6bn in cash and take on Beam’s debt.

It will make Suntory the world’s third largest maker of distilled drinks.

The two companies have a previous partnership whereby they distribute each other’s brands in different markets.

Beam’s brands also include Maker’s Mark bourbon, Sauza tequila, and Courvoisier cognac.

Have a look at the extent of the Beam Inc ownership of liquor, some damn good bourbons there, as well as a few suprises, like my old rot-gut drink, Gilbey’s Gin. I quit drinking the stuff when it just started giving me horrible hangovers, and I was at a point when I could afford better gin for my cocktails.

I think it’ll be in good hands as Japan is fanatical about burbon! Still this is a HUGE changing of hands for spirits!

BLNN Logo

Posted in Food | 6 Comments

Some Softness for All!

So Breda sent me this link:

“Ducks are very social, raising a single duck is basically a death sentence, they will die of loneliness,” he wrote.
The new dad decided to try to keep the duckling company. “Peeps doesn’t have a mother’s wing to go under, so my beard had to do,” Brian said.

Thankfully when I raised ducks there were two of them from a bunk batch of eggs. Really good as at that point I don’t even know if I was shaving yet.

Also from the same site was this bit of joy!27 Ways the Capybara is the Life of the Party.

Just follow the link, I can’t do it any justice!

Posted in Biology | Leave a comment

Morning Music

This is a good one! Enjoy!

Posted in Music | 2 Comments

Loaded Chamber Indicator

So Joan made me want to make a more general gunny post. In a recent post she quotes an article that erroneously says Glocks don’t have a Loaded Chamber Indicator (LCI).

In the comments she actually approves a few who point out the claim is hooey. She prattles that she isn’t responsible as it wasn’t her fault the article was crap. Also she says this:

I linked to a video that showed that Glock’s “loaded chamber indicators” were not the same as other such guns and potentially ineffective in showing whether a bullet was still in the chamber.
And the person in the video was critical of that. Glock can do much better with their technology. And that’s what the writer of the article was saying. Just because you don’t agree doesn’t mean it is not true. We are talking about human lives here Robin. So stop your nonsensical harassment. Go troll another blog. Mine is not the place for you.

Ahh, “No True Scottsman”! Still let’s get into the bigger issue. There are a TON of LCIs on the market from Ruger’s big red flags that are downright obnoxius, to extended extractors, and witness holes. Heck a gun shop pointed out that looking beside the recoil shield for case rims is considered an LCI.

frankly I don’t like them much. I’m not AGAINST them like say Magazine Disconnects or DA guns that feel the need to ALSO put in a safety that can be engaged even when the hammer is on the half-cock notch, or the striker is at its resting position, but I generally prefer to ignore them.

Ruger’s big flag is very nice, as far as they go. It sticks way up, is a bright color, and can be physically felt. Meanwhile its still lower than the rear sight block so you don’t actually see it when you’re shooting. Still its a simple lever and spring. I’ve never seen it happen, but I can imagine that dirt or excess lubricant might gum it up to make an unloaded gun look loaded, or a worn or broken part might make the flag stay down on a chambered round. The extractors can be ambiguous, and witness holes might be miss read (say from a darker colored case, or nickle case in a stainless barrel) and when playing with mine with a bight-orange dummy round, I find myself twisting and turning the gun to get a good view and good light which can easily lean to an ignorance of Rule #2.

Still LCIs are one of the newest inventions of gun “Safety”, and generally supported by people who also don’t like making gun training an easy thing. There are tons of older guns out there with no LCI, and they are perfectly safe because YOU DON’T NEED THEM!! Simple training can solve this problem, as well as avoid the risk of misreading or malfunctioning LCIs.

A press check is VERY simple and easy to do, and there is NO ambiguity, either you see a round in the chamber, or you don’t. If you don’t it COULD be a broken extractor or a stuck round, but once you see the gun is “unloaded” you can clear the gun and visually inspect the chamber…or attempt to chamber another round which will cause a double-feed and you can then sort out why your gun is malfunctioning.

Revolvers are easier, simply pop open the cylinder and inspect all the charge holes and close up the gun. I check all my guns before I carry them, or move them.

Also here’s a little bit of philosophy for training new shooters. When I teach a brand new shooter I make sure there is a bench or table in front of them while they shoot. If your range doesn’t have a bench on the firing line a simple camp or card table can easily be brought along. Before the new shooter even gets to a firing line where there are noises and distractions I make sure they know and understand all four rules of gun safety. They don’t need to be able to rattle them off 100% verbatim, or get the order correct. They just need to show they understand that there is no such thing as an “Unloaded” gun, or any time they can be allowed to break the other rules. That the muzzle must ALWAYS be in a safe direction. The last thing they do before they fire is place their finger on the trigger, and the first thing they do once they finish a shooting string is take their finger OFF the trigger, and they will always be sure of their target and backstop, and be well aware that bullets go through things.

Once they’re on the range I don’t teach them ANY of the safety features on the guns (with the exception of drop safeties, I do make them well aware that all guns that will be used are drop safe, and if a gun is heading to the ground they simply must get out of the way and let it fall…thankfully for my gun finishes this has yet to happen), if the gun has a manual safety, I don’t inform them. If the gun has an LCI, I don’t tell them about it. If the gun is a double action, or “Safe Action” gun, I will only inform them the difference of trigger pull. I’ll also point out grip safeties because that’s necessary.

Still there’s no need to fill a new shooter’s mind with mechanical details. Just teach them to safely hold and fire the gun and keep rounds on paper. When they stop shooting the gun is simply placed on the bench. If the gun is still loaded I can deal with it from there.

I only get down into mechanical nitty-gritty with a new shooter if they inquire about it. Use of safeties and other mechanical widgets are reserved for more intermediate shooters.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety | 3 Comments