Slant and Spin

I found this article, that has an obvious slant to it, but I thought I’d give my take.

The studies looked at things like differences between groups’ perception of eye movement, and aversion to threatening noises. Researchers also noted that Democrats had larger anterior cingulate cortexes, which are associated with tolerance to uncertainty, while Republicans had larger right amygdalas, which are associated with sensitivity to fear.

“Everybody seems to basically agree, and these are people that have scientific backgrounds,” Markoff said of the repetition in the studies. “That to me is probably the biggest eye-opener.”

Although Markoff concluded the studies combine to mean that the different groups communicate in different ways, psychiatrist Greg Appelbaum said the studies point toward conservatives’ tendency to avoid something called self-harm, while liberals avoid collective group harm.

Now the slant comes in with the display of the results “tolerance to uncertainty”, and “sensitivity to fear” are pretty loaded statements, but let’s look at them a little closer.

Maybe its just me, but does high tolerance to uncertainty and low fear sound like somebody you might know? That isn’t a loaded question because the person I’m thinking of is ME!

Now not the me that’s sitting here today, but the “clean shaven”, younger me. I didn’t have much for world experience, so I was less hesitant on novel ideas, and like most teens, I assumed bad stuff just happened to other people, so I was generally less cautious. I can think of dozens of risky behaviors I engaged in that could have physically, financially, or socially harmed me permanently. Strangely enough this risk-taking me was also much more “Progressive”, and I’d say “Stupid”.

Fear isn’t a bad thing, fear can be VERY good. Think of how you react when approached by a dog with wide eyes and a wagging tail, vs the same dog with ears pinned back and teeth bared. Sometimes this can be unfounded, I remember recoiling at a friends dog who had a tendency to “Smile” when excited. She’d flip her upper lip back bearing her teeth, while she hopped around and wagged her tail. I learned this behavior and adapted to it, but can you fault me for stepping back from a dog with its teeth exposed?

We can also look at political policies. The “Progressives” want to ban civilian firearms. Now by doing this they eliminate self-defense, which they claim isn’t needed…at the same time they claim that every lawful gun owner is a psychopath just moments away from committing mass murder.

I think this odd reaction ties in well with this profile. I want to refrain from the loaded term of “Fear”, but let’s turn it to “caution”. They don’t feel the same level of caution others may on their day-to-day. They seem upset that I might carry a gun, but have zero concern for the cars speeding past them as they walk on the sidewalk. Hell they might even drop a dollar into the hat of a hobo laying on the sidewalk with no though on how and why that person may have come to such a dire predicament.

Meanwhile they ignore the stats and information about defensive gun use, and lower crime rates in areas with liberal gun ownership, because others have told them the new laws will make things “Better”.

The same can be said about people’s tolerance for the TSA. They don’t feel caution about giving up rights to a bunch of poorly-trained strangers, often will ill intent, because they trust that they are being made safer.

Or the people who seem to always want to implement national socialism, even tho countless regimes have become the biggest mass-murderers in history. “This time we’ll do it right!” seems to be the call of a person with an unhealthy level of cation, and an unhealthy tolerance of an uncertain end.

I could go on and on. I’ll close with a joke I recently heard. A comedian was noting that his Mom used the “If all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?” Cliche. The comedian noted that he probably would, because he trusts and loves his friends, and wouldn’t associate with them if they did dumb things for no reason. He mentioned that maybe the bridge was on fire. I personally thought of jumping off bridges into rivers in Maine with friends. I saw my friends jump, after they told me it was safe, and I saw them swim away happy, so while there is some risk, its a calculated one.

Also the thrill of jumping long distances into dark water isn’t much if you don’t still have some fear.

I’ll finish with a note that this is all the rules of averages, and covers a vast N-value, meaning different education and knowledge levels.

My wife is quite conservative, and seems to become more and more so the older she gets…yet she is 100% without a right amygdala.

After Surgery

She’s like the way she is because she’s both logical and intelligent. She’s also a very cautious person, not excited about doing new things without doing her due-diligence. This goes for “Progressive” ideas, as well as some of my more radical Libertarian ones. I can’t say I fault her for that.

Can you?

Posted in Biology, Politics, Safety | 1 Comment

On Limp Wrists

This is a good video, and it even presents some information that’s new to me

I was well aware of what a “Limp Wrist” malfunction is and how they work. Still I hadn’t thought about it in terms of how it relates to ammo. He notes that .40 S&W guns are difficult for him to limp wrist. This is likely due to the “Snappy” recoil of .40 S&W. The recoil curve “Snaps” the slide back before your wrist can break up and back and either cause the slide to short-stroke, or to catch the ejected case before it clears the ejection port and stovepipe.

This got me thinking about my Kahr PM45. Allegedly Kahr pistols need 200 rounds to break in. My first 200 rounds in my Kahr were no different than my next 200 and so-on. Still the recoil spring did loosen up considerably. That extra-stiff spring COULD easily cause a short-stroke. It got me thinking of myself in those first 200 shots. I was shooting for the first time a 20oz .45 ACP pistol. I had concerns that the gun might be more than a handful, so I had a LOT of tension on the gun, this allowed more energy to be transferred to the action and allowed for smoother cycling.

Also it makes me think that not only the added power, but the added recoil impulse makes +P ammo ideal for carry, given that both the shooter and the gun can tolerate the extra power.

Good to know, and be safe out there!

Posted in Guns, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Feet To The Flame

Lee Gets a chance to interview President Obama, and he does an EXPERT Job!

The answers are loaded with double-speak and dodges, but are also loaded with verifiable lies.

Take Aways:

– Obama will do all he can to take away your guns. If it saves “Just One Life” at the cost of THOUSANDS its “Worth it”. Also he directly contradicts Vice President Biden’s statments that the laws won’t do anything to stop mass shootings.

– Obama likes Lincoln’s philosophies. He wants us all to be United…even if it kills Hundreds of Thousands

– Obama will use drones for whatever he damn well pleases.

Awesome interview, and good things to remember!

Posted in Freedom, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” “Assault Weapon”

As in a weapon used to Assault!

Police say negotiators were called to coax a man out of a Las Vegas apartment after he reportedly chased a stranger down a street with an axe.

But this weapon isn’t a gun, so nothing to see here, look away!

h/t Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Your Daily Dose of Weer’d

Its Strange, and I love it!

Posted in Random | Leave a comment

DO WANT!

Man this just looks wicked cool!

I can see myself now on a warm summer evening drinking a martini from a fine “Glass” on my balcony, and when I finish my drink tossing it down into my yard like a proper alcoholic!

Also would be interesting to see how well the “Glass” takes ice for chilling, and how soft it gets from gin sitting in it for an hour. Still this is just crazy neat!

The dude’s company is here.

Posted in Food | 4 Comments

Reason on The Keystone Pipeline

A great video!

Posted in Biology, Politics | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Need

You wanna talk Need?

A father-of-two was killed in a horrifying accident when a giant inflatable ball in which he and another man were rolling down a mountain plunged off a cliff at a ski-resort in southern Russia.

Denis Burakov, 27, married with two young daughters, broke his neck and spine in the zorbing accident, say reports.

This thing isn’t for self defense, its just for fun…and somebody is DEAD!

But hey, let’s focus on the guns!

h/t Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | 3 Comments

“Gun Death” Feral Dogs

Unlike guns, dogs to sometimes “just go off”.

A pack of feral dogs may be responsible for the deaths of as many as five people in a Mexico City park, the authorities said Wednesday. Last week, the police said dogs had killed four people, including a woman and a baby boy, whose mutilated bodies were found in the park in December.

That’s a “Mass Murder” except for the whole “Gun Death” part. The people who use “Gun Death” are all heart!

h/t Whipped Creme Difficulties

Posted in Gun Death? | 1 Comment

Anti-Freedom

It is NOT partisan!

Former Illinois Rep. Debbie Halvorson wants ex-Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.’s seat in Congress. So do 16 other people. But the Democrat says she’s getting hammered by her own party over her pro-gun rights views.

Halvorson, who had served in the House of Representatives from 2009 to 2011 and lost to Jackson in a 2012 Democratic primary, says she’s being targeted by a super PAC funded by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

“I’m the only (candidate) who cannot be rubberstamped, I’m the only one who can’t be controlled,” she told Fox News.

The Independence USA PAC released two ads this week against Halvorson, warning voters to “watch out” for her because of her “A” rating from the National Rifle Association. One ad, which airs on cable and broadcast television stations, goes on to list several gun control measures Halvorson voted against.

Remember this isn’t a partisan issue, but a civil rights one. Illinois has lost not one but TWO court battles against their anti-gun policies, and even tho their laws are illegal, they want them to stay in place!

This isn’t anti-gun but anti-freedom. The current Democrat leadership is like the old Democrat leadership of the Jim Crow South, doing all they can to deprive rights from those they don’t like!

BLNN Logo

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | 2 Comments