Combat Accuracy

Old NFO points me to this video by the great hickok45

An uber-high-end Ed Brown 1911 According to Google they run about $2500 NIB and a plane-Jayne Glock 21 Which runs around $530 NIB. Both guns are considered high quality and good value for their price point.

Still using both guns and the same ammo he shows he can ring any gong on his wonderful playground. When it comes to collecting, possessing , and shooting guns your tastes are the only relevant factor. I own a couple of 1911s, I don’t own any Glocks. Doesn’t mean I think Glocks aren’t great guns, just I never fell in love with one. (I really wanted to love a G20 I found a local shop for a good price, but standing there with the gun in my hand I just knew I wouldn’t shoot it much) Some people prefer revolvers, others semi-autos, others prefer to bother with shotguns and rifles over handguns.

Still when it comes to practical carry guns, which is better? The $2,500 1911, or the $530 Glock? Neither, they’re both effective lead delivery systems at practical ranges….and frankly beyond because unless hickok45 is doing some handgun hunting I don’t see him defending his life from attackers 80 yards away.

BTW when I shoot my 1911s some days my groups are fairly tight, others they really suck. I rarely get a group under 3-4″ on the page, and some days 8″ circles is all I can shoot consistently, what hickok45 shows is this is ONLY me, not my gun or my ammo, and in the end unless you’re going to log the crazy time to become a proficient offhand target shooter, there’s no need to quibble about what gun is better than what other gun.

Pick a gun in an effective caliber that feels good for you to carry and shoot and then practice with it. Doesn’t matter if its a .380 or a 10mm, doesn’t matter if its a used Glock or a NIB Ultra-custom 1911.

Actually scratch that, beware of REALLY tight guns, the accuracy they produce won’t be noticeable in your hands, but the tight tolerances might effect reliability.

Carry your damn guns!

Posted in Guns | Leave a comment

Doctor Update

I’m heading into the office in a bit, just thought I’d drop yet another update. Very fortunate that we already had this appointment scheduled so everything was able to move so fast.

The Mrs. is off to work, and while still not quite herself, she’s doing well and grateful for all the well-wishes. And the doctor recommended we again taper the medications, this time over a much longer time, and with an end at one of the smaller therapeutic doses. The taper starts immediately, so hopefully draining off a little bit of medication out of her system will help her recover a bit faster and feel a lot better. Also this keeps us on track with finding the best fit for seizure freedom, which is certainly achievable.

So good news!

Posted in Epilepsy, Family and Friends | Leave a comment

Morning LOL

More from Good old Joad.

Man I love this stuff!

Posted in Politics, Random | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Convicts and Pizza

This one got the “Bad Justice” tag too!

A man who stabbed another man to death in a fight over how to cook a Pizza Pop will be released to a halfway house.

But the decision by the Parole Board of Canada ordering the move raises questions about the effectiveness of the rehabilitation Brandon John Anderson, 20, received while behind bars.

“Your willingness to use weapons — whatever they may be — is . . . concerning and further suggests that you do not care how seriously you hurt others,” the board said in its recently released decision.

“”Your willingness to use weapons — whatever they may be” is really exactly why I run the “Gun Death?” files. They were cooking pizza and another man was murdered and the Canadians want to parole this jerk. We all know its not the tools, its the people, and more people will get killed as long as this beast draws breath.

h/t Wallphone

Posted in Bad Justice, Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Evening Oddity

So the other night the Mrs. was watching the 1998 Remake of The Parent Trap starting the insatiable Lindsay Lohan

I found myself deeply amused by imagining her in clown makeup and prattling like Dr. Rockso

I DO COCAINE A gigigigigigig YEAHHHHHH!!!!!!!

Seriously, try it, see if you laugh as hard as I did!

Another amusing clip here.

Posted in Movies, Random | Leave a comment

Six Guns

OK I’m a 1911 guy specifically, and a semi-auto guy in general, but I’m hardly anti-revolver. As a matter of fact I’m packing my S&W642 today, and I think ANYBODY who’s serious about carrying should have a small-frame lightweight revolver in their collection. They’re no fun to shoot, and they don’t hold a lot of rounds, or are particularly easy to reload given they’re revolvers, and given the short ejector under that short barrel. But you can load and unload them all day, and they’re light enough to drop in a purse, bag, or pocket at a moment’s notice in case one has to run some unexpected errands.

Still we got talking here about revolvers holding numbers other than 6 shots. I got thinking of various revolvers that hold more or less than six rounds. Obviously I lead with the J-frame, and many small-frame .38/.357 revolvers carry only 5 shots. There are a TON of modern revolvers that carry more than 6 shots like the S&W686+ that is optioned to hold 7, there’s the S&W627 that rocks an impressive 8, and countless 8,9,and 10 shot .22 Revolvers. But that’s modern day.

We all know the SAA and Colt Navy percussion revolver that are best known among several others in the early days of repeating handguns often held an even 6 shots. But even back then 6 wasn’t the standard. Take the LeMat Revolver this Percussion revolver had a 9-shot cylinder, plus a central shotgun barrel. In the metallic cartridge world there was the very first Smith and Wesson revolver made in 1857 held 7 shots. Even into the fledgling days of smokeless powder the Russian Nagant Revolver was a 7 shooter. The famous Webley Revolver was a 6-gun in .455, the updated auto-cocking Webley-Frosbery came with either a 6-shot .455 Cylinder, OR a .38 ACP 8-shot Wheel.

And of course guns in a smaller size would have that 6th Charge hole deleted to further shrink the gun like the S&W Safety Hammerless which gave way to their J-Frame and its imitators.

Of course there are guns that use cartridges so massive they also need to make do with 5 like the S&W X-frame revolvers, or the .480 Ruger Alaskan.

So in the end, while many popular revolvers came standard with 6 charge holes, the revolver was never cemented in that number.

Posted in Guns | Leave a comment

Twitch Update

So the Mrs. came home, and we had dinner and talked about her epilepsy. She’s doing MUCH better, and I imagine its only a matter of time before these transient side effects vanish.

Things are looking really good, and she’s feeling pretty good about stuff. More after the Doctor Visit tomorrow morning! 😀

Posted in Epilepsy, Family and Friends | Leave a comment

Magic Phones

So I’m getting my alergy shot right now and I noticed everybody in the waiting room is tinkering with one form of smart-phone or another.

So I pulled out my own phone and blogged about it.

How cool is that?

**UPDATE** Just as I started typing this a woman walked in and started reading a paperback. A Paperback! Not even an ebook reader! LOL

Posted in Technology | Leave a comment

Probably Illegal Here

I’m no expert in Massachusetts gun laws. Well because nobody is. Ask 5 different people about some minutia and you’ll get 5 different answers.

I’m curious if the 12 shot cylender on this US Firearms 12/22 revolver counts as a “Large Capacity feeding Device”. (Irrelevant as I doubt US Firearms will submit units for Massachusetts “Safety Testing”) Single-Action revolvers don’t interest me much so I’m not sure if the 10-shot Single Ten pictured above in the link is approved for Massachusetts sale, honestly just THINKING about working that ejector 10 times (let alone 12) makes my teeth grind. Most of the time if you hand me a single-action revolver, unless its a Schofield I’ll thank you for letting me shoot it, and hand the gun over with the empties still in the wheel.

Still I’d be interested if S&W wanted to make a Double-action in an N-Frame in .22 LR that holds 12 or more. I have a S&W 617, and its one of my favorite guns:

How stupid would it be if a 12 shot revolver (single or double) was illegal because it holds more than 10. Certainly the .22 pistols out there often hold only 10 in the box because 11 or 12 would be evil and bad.

BTW that 12 shot single looks like a GREAT gun for hunters or farmers who might need a little less gun for various things that need lead at high speed. I can imagine a hunter who might pop a few small critters while looking for bigger game, or using the .22 for a coup de grace on a downed animal, or a farmer who has pest critters around the farm.

Hell depending on your pest population you could load up your wheelie on Sunday and shoot prairie dogs, woodchucks, Coyotes and rats all week!

Also when target shooting more ammo in the wheel (or magazine) means you can get more repetitions of your shot before you need to break your concentration and reload.

And of course when it comes to a fancy new gun, what does “Need” have to do with anything?

Posted in Freedom, Guns | Leave a comment

@ Work

Both of us are in the office today. The Mrs. still isn’t feeling 100%, but she’s being a trooper.

We meet with the doctor tomorrow. Again, thanks for all the well-wishes, thoughts and prayers.

Also you know who you are, thanks for the food.

We’re gonna make it over this hump.

Posted in Epilepsy, Family and Friends | Leave a comment