Good

Looks like Joan Peterson of the Brady Campaign and the Million Mom March, not to mention she’s in the pocket of the Joyce Foundation (Good work Thirdpower! Quite the incestuous lot those gun-banners are!) Has started the next leg of her Sad But predictable downward spiral.

After careful thought and reflection about the direction my blog has taken since I asked questions and got answers from the “gun guys”, I have changed the purpose of my blog. As stated in my last post, I have found that most of the comments were just not getting the two sides of this volatile issue to a place where a thoughtful discussion could take place. Though the title of my blog indicates that I would like to have a discussion, I am not sure that is possible….After careful thought and reflection about the direction my blog has taken since I asked questions and got answers from the “gun guys”, I have changed the purpose of my blog. As stated in my last post, I have found that most of the comments were just not getting the two sides of this volatile issue to a place where a thoughtful discussion could take place. Though the title of my blog indicates that I would like to have a discussion, I am not sure that is possible.

Good, I’m glad to hear she is no longer lying about wanting to have a discussion. (FYI is IS possible to have a discussion about ANY issue so long as you have at least TWO WILLING PARTIES…I think we know what side that lies on) and is now doubling down on the “Gun Death” metric.

You think “Gun Death” is a valid cause to hang your hat on, Joan? Well you have some explaining to do.

Of course she won’t engage anybody who disagrees with her…which is just fine, as I’m 100% comfortable with the world seeing her as an indefensible, self-centered woman picking only one small metric of violence as “Valid”.

Remember if you had a loved one who was killed with violence, but was stabbed, beaten, burned, poisoned, run-down, asphyxiated, or many other means of murder, Joan Peterson of the Brady Campaign, Million Mom March, and the Joyce Foundation doesn’t think your loss is relevant. Also if you have lost a loved one to suicide and it came from poisoning, asphyxiation, Exsanguination, automobile, a long fall, or other means, your loss also isn’t valid.

If you’re a woman who was raped by somebody armed with a knife, or brute force, your pain is invalid to Joan Peterson of the Brady Campaign, Million Mom March, and the Joyce Foundation.

Also if you were robbed at gun-point, you have suffered far more than somebody who spent a week in ICU and lost sight in one eye after being beaten by a street gang in an initiation, at least according to Joan Peterson of the Brady Campaign, Million Mom March, and the Joyce Foundation.

I’m very glad she’s gone down this path, as its a path that most people who want to ban guns have gone down, and it is a path that is largely unsympathetic by the general population.

Good work on you, Joan Peterson for exposing both your cold-blooded nature, you self-centered narcissism, as well as your political irrelevance! May your life of activism be one failure after another!

Posted in Freedom, Gun Death?, Guns | Leave a comment

Should You Carry Less-Lethal?

So Breda found this stupid ring that gives an attacker a wiff of pepper spray. It looks like a generally bad device, and what’s said there is all that needs to be said about this POS. Sebastian also talked about it, and also agrees the ring is worthless. That’s not what I’m talking about, I take issue in this:

I still think it’s a good idea to carry OC. There’s a whole lot of force between harsh language and hot lead that pepper spray helps fill. One can imagine situations where someone is in desperate need of being in pain, but gunfire would not be legally justified. For instance, someone stealing the radio in your car: if you shoot him, you’re going to jail.

Sorry Seb, can’t agree. First let’s just get the value of less-lethal devices out of the way be going back to my old post here. The effective stopping power of Tasers and Chemical spays is effectivly zero. Even if they work they’ll only give you a few seconds to remedy the situation before the attacker can continue the attack. For non-lethal situations, you’re now the bad guy. Somebody stealing the radio out of your car, as Sebastian suggested. Maybe you’ll stop the theft, maybe you’ll piss off somebody who was only interested in your radio, and convince him your blood might be a worthwhile endeavor.

As I have said there, here, and everywhere. You should be walking away or drawing your gun. If you can walk away you should, if you’re not in a position to walk away, then you can justify lethal force. Sebastian responds.

Basically, if you say stop, and he keeps escalating, you’re free to go immediately to spray. If you go immediately to gunfire, you better hope he has a weapon so you can make a plausible story for your $400 dollar an hour defense attorney to tell to police. Basically, if he’s escalating, you have to wait until he’s a deadly threat before you can resort to deadly force. Why should that be your only option? Sure, you can try to walk away, or run, but what if he pursues or wants to fight you?

You can’t shoot someone who wants to engage in a fist fight, and not expect to shell out six figures for a lawyer to defend you in court. Especially where we live. If you can end the fight with spray, it’s a preferable option, and less dangerous than a fist fight.

I didn’t respond on his comments mostly because the topic had gone in another direction and is quite long, and I don’t feel like having him chase my rebuttals all across a 20+ comment post. He’ll see my trackback, and if he wants to defend his statement here, that would be awesome.

First up there’s a false dichotomy. Yes, shooting an unarmed attacker is a messy legal issue (of course it can be very much less messy if it is multiple unarmed attacker, or there is an age or size difference, or if it happens that said aggressor is a well known thug ect ect) but Sebastian seems to suggest that dosing an aggressive person with pepper somehow won’t result in a messy legal battle.

Your pepper could piss off an otherwise posturing thug and suddenly having him charging you looking for blood. Now you have to choose how to defend yourself, do you attempt to use fists, or maybe a pocket knife, or do you go for the gun? You’re also going to now have to worry about maintaining control of your gun in case its discovered and your attacker attempts to grab it.

Also even if the person runs away, I would strongly recommend you call 911, as using pepper spray or a Taser is still assault. Will the police like your story or will you be charged? If you don’t call will your attacker attempt to call the police on you?

Its a mess either way, or potentially not a mess at all. (Say if you end up shooting a 300 Prison yard Monster who was released last week from the pen on a 5 year sentence for raping livestock to death, and the coroner found meth, coke, ibogaine, rogaine, midol, and jolt cola in his system…or the less hyperbolic gang of 5 drunk hoodlums looking to bother an innocent person)

Its my advice that you don’t clutter your belt, or your mind (If you are concerned about your safety you should not be weighing the situation on what you should reach for. Much simpler to reach, or not reach) with excessive tools for various situations. Instead I recommend:

#1. Carry a gun. If you can’t or won’t, carry a defensive knife like the ka-Bar TDI

#2. Avoid confrontation. If you see somebody acting aggressive, or otherwise irrational STAY AWAY from them. If you see somebody stealing property and you’d rather not escalate it to a deadly force scenario, LEAVE THEM BE and call the Police. (I’ll let others decide what where and when property is worth lethal force)

#3. If you are directly confronted by somebody de-escalate. Walk away, inform your accosted that you are walking away and have no desire to have a confrontation. If this somehow compromises your masculinity or self-esteem you shouldn’t be carrying weapons, and likely shouldn’t be considered an adult. I have a gun on me, and I’d rather not shoot anybody…if this makes a drunk asshole think I’m a “pussy” or a “wimp”, why the hell do I care? A night when nobody gets hurt is a good night. My feelings don’t count. Spraying or tasing somebody has just as much a chance of escalating the situation as it does to stop it. Also use of less lethal force is use of force, so you are now the assailant. This can be legally justified, but it can also be legally challenged.

#4. If you are unable to walk away (being forced to run can be a very tricky situation, and you do NOT want to be in a sprinting contest with somebody of unknown ability who is considered a threat), you ARE in a deadly force scenario. You CAN be beaten to death. You CAN have your gun taken from you, you do not know what weapons your assailant has or can acquire. (A loose piece of concrete while you are rolling on the ground can end your life just as easily as a .44 in his waistband), if you still have the advantage of distance from your assailant draw your weapon and request to be left alone. If they advance on a loaded weapon drawn by somebody who has already attempted to avoid confrontation, SHOOT THEM. Let the law sort things out, rather than you trying to figure out how to get a street fighter off your back while retaining control of your gun without him killing you.

There is already so much that has gone wrong before you even drew your gun that you will likely have a good case. Of course your case is going to be worse if you didn’t follow all those steps. If you confront the drunk asshole who hasn’t noticed you, you’re now in a bit of trouble if you end up shooting him. If you decide to talk tough in hopes that the person yelling obscenities at you will back down and cave to your alpha-dog swagger…well you’re going to have a tough case if this escalates to you shooting him. If you don’t attempt to escape when an avenue is available to you, and/or give verbal commands and/or warnings, and simply draw and fire when accosted, you’re in trouble.

The above steps are means to allow your attacker to escalate force to a point where they leave you little option but to fear for your life. If you take great steps to avoid deadly confrontations, when one DOES happen to you, you’ll be on good legal grounds.

And again, DO NOT CARRY PEPPER SPRAY OR TASERS!

Posted in Guns, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Another Ironic One

Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones But Names will never hurt me…

A man who confessed to fatally stomping a Phoenix woman over a racial slur has been convicted of murder.

Maricopa County prosecutors say Jose Preciliano Quintero was convicted Monday of first-degree murder, sexual abuse and kidnapping.

Prosecutors say Quintero cannot be sentenced to death because he was 16 at the time of the December 2008 slaying. He faces a sentence of up to life in prison.

Quintero told police he was upset because his girlfriend had just broken up with him and that he snapped when 38-year-old Helen Coulter called him a racial slur.

Authorities say Quintero admitted dragging Coulter to a vacant lot, stomping on her and sexually abusing her with a stick. An autopsy showed Coulter died of blunt force trauma.

Yikes, brutal story. But there is no “Gun Death” here so just move along!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Why Open Carry is Good

Take some time out of your Day and listen to the 911 call from the Wisconsin Open Carry Arrests. More on the story here

First you have what I would call hysteria. Men with guns at a busy restaurant, and she’s disturbed that they’re minding their own business and are visibly relaxed and having a good time. Several times she asks to be re-assured that these are Police Officers, because a badge beside said gun makes a HUMONGOUS difference, doesn’t it?

But that’s not the money line. Wait until the displacer informs the caller that Open carry is legal in Wisconsin. She APOLOGIZES! Yep, if this women sees people minding their own business and causing no problems do you think she’ll call 911 again?

I’m betting not.

Also what the hell is with the dispatcher saying anything about “If somebody is disturbed by it”. People are disturbed by two men holding hands. People are disturbed by mixed-race couples. People are disturbed by political bumperstickers that disagree with their ideology. People are disturbed that the Madison PD was in the wrong for demanding their identification. Hell people are disturbed by long hair and short skirts.

being “Disturbed” is a bullshit metric, and really shouldn’t be spoken by ANY professional in law enforcement.

Educate!

Posted in Freedom, Guns | Leave a comment

Rings Hollow

In a Recent post by Joan Peterson of the Brady Campaign and of the Million Mom March, she said this:

Be careful out there. If you hunt, be safe and shoot safely. And more than anything, be responsible for your own actions while holding your gun. Bullets injure and kill birds and animals during hunting season but they can also kill and injure people.

In the comments I asked her what she recommended for safety and training coursed for new hunters and shooters looking to gain skills safely. The first comment she never approved. Then I posted it again, and she published it and said something to the effect of “Why don’t you do that on your own blog.” Then she smelled a trap and deleted both of them.

Trap I say? Yep, wonder why? Well go scan Joan’s page…go Scan the Brady Campaign websites, go check out the Million Mom March chapters.

The closest I could get was the American Hunters and Shooters, which is intrinsically connected to the Brady Campaign comes the closest to having anything remotely to do with actual firearms safety, and that is simply a re-tread of The Ten Commandments of Gun Safety, and never do they even so much as mention how, where, or why somebody might be able to, or want live-fire training.

Let’s face it these are gun-ban groups, nothing else. Why would you need firearms safety training if all guns are banned? Also you’ll note that Joan publishes incidents of hunting accidents in her posts. Gun accidents and Gun Violence are useful to these people, hence why they are so crazy about the “Gun Death” metric.

Both the Gunnies and the Antis both claim our end goals to reduce death and violence, but groups like the NRA are huge sources of safety training, as well as self-defense training. Most of us gun bloggers take an active role in inviting new shooters to expense-paid range time and safety training.

Odd that the side of the aisle that is well documented as lying seems to be lying about wanting to reduce accidental death too….and that whole idea that its OK to hunt too.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Safety | Leave a comment

Awake

When I announced that Mrs. Weer’d was going to have surgery to correct her epilepsy. So many people asked if she would need to be awake for the surgery. Some people were so convinced that all epilepsy surgery is done with the patient awake. Now for the Wife’s Wada test she did need to be fully away and was only administered a local anesthetic where the catheter was inserted. (if you’re curious I found a video of Dr. Wada himself on youtube) But the Wada concluded that the portion of the brain that was to be removed does not contain any vital mental mapping. (I’ll note that I’m curious if that tissue did anything at all, or if it was shut off from the rest of the brain early on in Mrs. Weer’ds life) So for her surgery we knew what tissue was causing problems, and we knew it didn’t do anything key, so the added stress of awake brain surgery was not needed and the Mrs. spent her 6 hours in the OR in a dreamless sleep.

That being said Alan sent me this neat video.

More of the story and a more inclusive video here. Seems this is deep nerve stimulation for essential tremor and the doctor needed him awake to find the EXACT problem location, and the best metric was Banjo skills.

I saw a before-and-after of a similar surgery for an old woman with severe Parkinsons. I’ll just say thinking about the results from this woman who I don’t even know her name brings tears to my eyes.

We live in an age of miracles!

Posted in Epilepsy | Leave a comment

Sports Equipment and Storage

These are the tools of this morning’s “Gun Death”

State police believe a local teenager who has been missing for months is the person who was killed and stuffed inside a barrel in Indiana County.

Investigators say 17-year-old Rodnell Burton was killed because he was trying to collect on a drug debt.

Jon Anthony Black, 32, of Blairsville, is accused of beating Burton to death with a baseball bat and then burning the body in the barrel.

Why do the anti-rights advocates focus on the tools? Do you think the baseball bat is really relevant in this case? How about the Barrel? How about the violent drug dealer?

Nah, let’s just ban guns!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

So Many Good Titles

You’ll need to listen to the whole thing, to hear all the potential titles. Another fun night with the Vicious Circle Crew

A great way to spend an evening with the family. Also surprisingly enough we’re at episode #69 and there appears to be one subject we didn’t talk about…go figure.

Posted in Podcast | Leave a comment

Local “Gun Death”

Heard this Local Story

Five years after he brought his family here for a better life, a Senegalese immigrant was mourning the death of his teenage son, stabbed to death on the usually quiet campus of a Catholic college in Weston this morning.

Elhaji Malick Ndiaye, 18, was identified by Middlesex prosecutors as one of two persons stabbed around 4:30 a.m. today on the campus of Regis College in Weston. Ndiaye died from his injuries, but the second person survived. Police are searching for the assailant.

A sad tale, but why? No guns were involved! Remember “Gun Death” is the only bad thing in society these days, people who are stabbed are irrelevant!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

For Jay

You KNOW he loves it!

Posted in Movies, Random | Leave a comment