“Gun Death” Horrible Abuse

Ye been warned on this one:

A Philadelphia child is dead and his parents in custody, charged with beating and starving the boy to death.

Police say 6-year-old Khalil Wimes weighed less than 30 pounds when he died Monday night of blunt-force trauma to the head.

Why the hell are these people so focused on “Gun Death”. Seriously. A horrible death, but they discount it because it doesn’t suit their agenda!

H/T Bob

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Interesting Walmart Story

So I follow the anti-gun Walmart Blog done by Jason Kilgore. This recent story has me scratching my head:

After the employee took five firearms out of the case at 12:22 p.m. Zwar grabbed the employee.

The clerk said Zwar held a knife to his throat and tried to cut him several times, documents state.

The clerk told authorities he was calmly able to get away and Zwar left the sporting goods area.

Zwar returned less than a minute later swinging a large yellow crow bar, documents state.

Zwar “smashed the glass out of the display case and removed one firearm,” documents state.

Walmart staff determined the firearm was a Bushmaster model M-16, .223-caliber semi-automatic rifle.

The whole article reads in the fashion that makes me wonder if Newspapers are hiring illiterates to write articles. Still what we know is a nut walked into a Walmart and asked to see some guns. When the employee got fives guns out of the case for him, the nut pulled a knife out and assaulted him. The employee “Calmly” got away and the dude left(??). He then came back and smashed the case with a crowbar (WTF??) and grabbed a gun (A Bushmaster “Model M-16″, I’m unaware of any such model name for semi-auto civilian guns. Seems most of the Bushmaster models are named “XM-15″, I suspect the reporter spaced out and made that part up) and was apprehended soon afterwards.

I’m glad nobody was hurt, and I’m REALLY glad this nut is off the streets, and I hope he stays that way with the fact that he’s being charged locally AND Federally for this little stunt. I hope once he serves his Federal nut for the gun charges he is transferred to the Montana prison system to pay off the armed robbery, assault, and attempted murder charges. This is NOT somebody you want around without a chaperone.

Still why did Jason bother with this article. Seems that simply because a gun was stolen this somehow supports his agenda that Walmart should stop selling guns and ammo. Because banning guns will somehow stop the lunatic with a knife and a crowbar.

Really the big issue is in every full-time gun store (90% of the time NOBODY is at the Walmart gun counter) there are several people behind the counter, and they are ALL visibly armed. Somebody pulls a knife on an associate in that fashion I suspect the attacker will suddenly have so many holes he’ll whistle as he falls!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety | 2 Comments

Images of the Antis: Lying About the Brady Bill

Now the biggest gun control victory in America in the last 40 years was the Federal Assault Weapons ban. It also turns out it was their biggest defeat as it woke up the casual gun owners and weekend hunters that indeed any appeasement of the anti-freedom crowd would eventually lead to the confiscation of their firearms. It also created what we now call “Gun Culture 2.0″, where 1.0 Gun Owners were hunters and target shooters, with the occasional revolver, pistol, or shotgun tucked in a bedroom “Just in case”, and the majority of these gun owners lived in rural America. 2.0 had the embrace of gun ownership of urban and suburban denizens, interest in concealed carry and defensive shooting, and popularity of practical shooting sports. This advance also further embraced all who were part of 1.0 so long as they weren’t hostile to the rights of the newer generation.

This movement has lead to the repeal of many unconstitutional, racist, and counter-productive gun laws, the expansion of concealed carry from a handful of may-issue states to 50 states, and now the District of Columbia having concealed carry, and most of those states with a Shall-Issue system, and of course, the sunset of the AWB. This series of crushing defeats has lead to the cult of anti-freedom to abandon the issue of banning firearms. They still want to ban them, but they know that they simply have zero chance of winning anymore.

So now they are doubling down on their runner-up victory which is even older. The Brady Background Check Bill.

Now let’s look at the “facts” presented. Starting they note that in 20 years there have been 118 million NICS checks, and 2 million denials. On it’s face that’s 1.6% of all checks denied. We can argue if that is reasonable, but first let’s look to see how relevant those numbers are. Have a look at this analysis:

About 99 percent of people who apply to buy a firearm are quickly cleared. But about 1 to 2 percent are denied, mainly because the records show that he or she has a felony indictment or conviction. The data also show that about 5 percent successfully appeal their denials.

Applications: 6,037,394

FBI denials: 72,659 (1.2 percent)

Appeals 16,513 (22.7 percent)

Successful appeals 3,491 (4.77 percent of denials)

OK while that’s not huge number of denials overall, the appeals numbers aren’t breathtaking. What does it mean?

But here is where it gets complicated. After a review by an arm of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), only a tiny percentage of the cases are actually referred to ATF field divisions for possible referral to prosecutors. Here are the data for 2010 concerning FBI denials.

FBI denials referred to ATF: 76,142

Referred to field: 4,732 (6.2 percent)

Not referred to field: 68,209 (89.6 percent)

Overturned: 3,163 (4.2 percent)

At first glance, these numbers seemed astonishing. In other words, another 4 percent of initial denials were found to be wrong — and nine out of 10 were not deemed worthy of further investigation.

Then, virtually all of these cases were declined by ATF field offices. Here are some of the key reasons, with essentially one-quarter being a case of mistaken denial — even after weeks of investigation.

No prosecutorial merit: 1,661

Federal/state guidelines not met: 1,092

Not a prohibited person: 480

Closed by supervisor: 457

No potential or unfounded: 396

In the end, 62 cases were referred for prosecution, but most were declined by prosecutors or dismissed by the court. Out of the original 73,000 denials, there emerge just 13 guilty pleas.

Now, let’s back up a moment. As far as we can determine, the very low rate of referrals does not mean that most of the denials were “false positives” or unwarranted. But it does mean that such cases are a low priority for government prosecutors.

So we aren’t dealing with “Dangerous Criminals”, we’re just dealing with paperwork. Good Job Gun-Grabbers!

Next up, let’s look at that “2 out of every 5 guns are sold or transferred without a background check”. Have a look at where the numbers come from:

The White House says the figure comes from a 1997 Institute of Justice report, written by Philip Cook of Duke University and Jens Ludwig of the University of Chicago. This study is based on data collected from a survey in 1994, just the Brady law requirements for background checks was coming into effect. (In fact, the questions concerned purchases in 1993 and 1994, while Brady law went into effect in early 1994.) In other words, this is a really old figure.

The data is available for researchers to explore at the Interuniversity consortium on political and social research (ICPSR) at the University of Michigan. Digging deeper, we find that the survey sample was just 251 people. (The survey was done by telephone, using a random-digit-dial method, with a response rate of 50 percent.) With this sample size, the 95 percent confidence interval will be plus or minus 6 percentage points.

Moreover, when asked if he or she bought from a licensed firearms dealer, the possible answers included “probably was/think so” and “probably not,” leaving open the possibility the purchaser was mistaken. (The “probably not” answers were counted as “no.”)

When all of the “yes” and “probably was” answers were added together, that left 35.7 percent of respondents indicating they did not receive the gun from a licensed firearms dealer. Rounding up gets you to 40 percent, though as we noted the survey sample is so small it could also be rounded down to 30 percent.

Moreover, when gifts, inheritances and prizes are added in, then the number shrinks to 26.4 percent. (The survey showed that nearly 23.8 percent of the people surveyed obtained their gun either as a gift or inherited it, and about half of them believed a licensed firearms dealer was the source.)

So get that? First a study that was conducted 17 years ago, about guns transferred 20 years ago, that only surveyed 251 people. So when we’re dealing with tens of millions of transfers, we survey 251 people. The numbers turned out to be just 35.7% which was heavily rounded up. Further “probably was” and “Probably not” answers were also heavily rounded up to “yes” and “no”, and even then the family transfers that even the antis are willing to concede take a HUGE chunk out of that already iffy number.

So it COULD be right, or it COULD be crap, either way they quote it as “fact”.

The biggest whopper is that it takes “60 seconds for a licensed dealer to complete a Brady Background check”. Where did they get this number? It takes me a few minuets to fill out the 4473 (and that’s not counting the time it takes for the dealer to provide me the form and a pen), It takes more than 60 seconds to dial the phone and wait for an answer. Hell it takes more than 60 seconds for the dealer to read all the information and spell the relevant parts over the phone. Maybe once that’s all said and done it takes 60 seconds for the person on the other end to clear the transfer, but boy it takes me about an hour from the time when I say “OK, I’ll take it!” to when I walk out the door with my new gun.

And these are the people dictating how guns are handled in this country?

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety | 3 Comments

“Gun Death” Metal Box

Interesting how places with the worst gun controls have some of the worst deaths:

The son of a convicted criminal brutally murdered in northern NSW has told a court his father died in a metal box with less dignity than an “animal in an abattoir”.

Really in modern abattoirs the animals are given a good deal of respect and dignity:

He said after being killed his father’s teeth were pulled out with pliers and his body hung from a beam, before being dismembered.

Good thing nobody had a gun!

H/T Sean

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Is There No Justice In This World?

I just searched Youtube, and there were NO (ZERO) videos of people playing the Magnum PI theme on the Banjo!

Can this REALLY be true? Is this the world we live in?

Posted in Music, Random | 4 Comments

Grahhh! Rule 2!!!!

Found this cool video from some sort of old artillery shoot

At 45 Seconds I just started to itch! Dude was capping what I believe is a fully live cannon (now, mind you at near-contact distance even a blank charge from a small arm can be fatal, let alone from one of these big boomers) with his legs at the muzzle!

There is no damn reason to do that! Load up the charge and ball (or no ball) and then run the needle down the nipple and cap the nipple with your body BEHIND the cannon.

Shooting guns is fun, but the moment things become unsafe the fun stops for anybody and everybody who knows what they’re doing….

Posted in Guns, Safety | 2 Comments

“Gun Death” Cannibal

Yep, you read correct!

A Florida man has been arrested for allegedly hacking to death a Connecticut man and eating the victim’s eye and part of his brain, police said Wednesday.

Go read the story, it’s REALLY horrific. Straight up cold-blooded murder. Also odd that the killer would leave Florida where guns allegedly grow on the palm trees for Connecticut where they have the strictest gun control.

And in the end the victim was murdered with an axe, a tool most of us own, but oddly don’t go on killing sprees and eating human flesh.

H/T Wallphone

Posted in Gun Death? | 1 Comment

“Gun Death” Mass Murder

Didn’t make the national news, I wonder why?

The man police say killed a family of five will go on trial for the crime.

…Court records indicate that Rust and her four children were choked to death. A police affidavit released indicated that **REDACTED** cousin found Rust’s body at the Elizabeth Place Apartments at 1955 S. Shepard Ave., and police soon found the bodies of her four children.

It was national news for a week when one 9-year-old girl lost control of a sub-gun and killed her instructor, but I hadn’t heard of this story until I read the email. FIVE people murdered and it’s a LOCAL story????

Good LORD the media has “Gun Death” on the mind as much as the anti-right cult. Of course the two of them are one and the same.

H/T Jennifer

Posted in Gun Death? | 1 Comment

For Scotland

Looks like you guys picked to forever be the welfare state of England.

Good for you! For you, a Swede messing with you!

Posted in Freedom, Music, Politics, Random | Leave a comment

Squirrel Burger In Paradise!

I hate Jimmy Buffet, but I couldn’t resist!

Tonight on the Squirrel Report we talk about Cheeseburgers! How do you make ‘em?

Also there will be politics. The “Progressive” view of the Constitution, Ebola, Should Scotland Be free? Plus more! Sit down, and enjoy a nice tall glass of Squirrel Tonight, and maybe even let your fingers do the walking so you can be part of the show.

Call in 214-530-0036 at 9pm EST for THE SQUIRREL REPORT!!!

(A Squirrel Eating a Grilled Cheese Sandwich I saw…how can you NOT take a picture of that???)

Posted in Food, Podcast, Politics | Leave a comment