More Manufactured Problems

The elephant in the room for the anti-rights activists is that as gun laws are relaxed in favor of individual liberty and self defense bad things aren’t happening! We can crunch numbers and explore if relaxed carry and self defense laws reduce crime or have no effect, what doesn’t exist is an INCREASE of crime. Logical people (the ones who don’t misuse the term “Common Sense”) will note that if people are allowed more freedom, and at WORSE there is no change, and there’s a chance that things will overall get better, that siding on individual liberty is the best solution. This is of course why the anti-rights groups are struggling for both relevancy as well as funds to keep their lies afloat.

Their best bet is to simply manufacture fear and troubles so maybe people will look away from reality. Seen on the Brady Campaign Twitter Page.

sgfstexas TX Gun-Free Schools
RT @corinnew Not to make light of this situation but if Perry’s #campuscarry bill goes into effect how wd you report “a man w gun on campus”

@bradybuzz Brady Campaign
A loaded gun on campus of VA Tech? The gun lobby would like to see it everyday with their push for “guns on campus” policies. @sgfstexas

Well first up, the “man with a gun on campus” call made at Virginia Tech did nothing but irrationally scare and disrupt people. Furthermore if it HAD been real, the laws that Brady Campaign propose would leave innocent people hiding under their desks hoping not to get shot.

Of course always ones to double-down on stupidity, Dennis Hennigan issues this Brady press release:

Just last month, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli indicated that the University of Virginia’s policy banning people with concealed carry licenses from carrying guns on campus is not binding or enforceable, in spite of a ruling by the Virginia Supreme Court upholding limitations on concealed carry on the campus of George Mason University. Cucinelli’s ruling also applies to Virginia Tech’s longstanding policy prohibiting concealed weapons on campus.

If the Attorney General’s interpretation is allowed to stand, then many Virginia campuses could be regularly subject to people with guns roaming the campus, and law enforcement would be powerless to stop them — until they start shooting.

You mean just like the surrounding land OFF campus? Can you tell when you leave school grounds when the grass becomes slick with blood? Or is there no problems at all. Also to all non-students and school employees who recreate on Virginia College Campuses (Same goes for Maine State Schools….I think one of the anti groups published a more comprehensive list, does anybody have that?) Carry your guns, because there are better options than hiding under your desk until you get shot!

Hell have a look at this slanted article that lists ten colleges that not only have no laws against lawful citizens carrying on campus, but also won’t punish students or staff for lawfully carrying. One thing that isn’t noted…how many mass shootings at those schools. Again logic and reality doing major damage.

Back to the presser:

Just as we saw with the Tucson shooter, our weak gun laws, particularly our lax regulation of guns in public places, make it easy for people with evil intentions to walk into sacred public spaces with guns and cause disruption, confusion, and hysteria at the very least, while being free at the worst, to commit murder.

If only carrying a gun was as illegal as murder, then there wouldn’t be any murder! These are philosophies that make sense to the damaged minds of those who hate freedom.

Shortly after the Virginia Tech Massacre, the gun lobby began pushing legislation in states across the country that would allow loaded, hidden guns on campuses. Thankfully, the Brady Campaign and other gun violence prevention advocates have been successful in defeating this legislation 63 times in 30 states since the Virginia Tech shootings. Had dozens of students and faculty been armed today on Virginia Tech’s campus, as envisioned by Attorney General Cuccinelli, there is no question that law enforcement’s ability to investigate the campers’ claims would have been complicated and innocent people might have been harmed.

First up their “Success” is just standing their ground. Of course with expansion of carry laws, Castle Doctrines, Stand-your-ground laws, Permitless carry, Shall-Issue Carry, They really are picking their victories out of piles of defeats.

If there had been dozens of armed students on campus yesterday this bullshit story wouldn’t have happened. Maybe a few extra police cars would be sent through, but no fear, no inconvenience, no lockdowns. And of course if students had been armed during the shooting at Virginia Tech the attack could have been stopped sooner. But “Gun Death” is their currency, and anything that prevents that is against their wishes.

Miguel has some more on a similar angle about CSGV. Go have a read, its quite impressive. I had to add this found on their twitter feed.

Would YOU want to engage in a passionate academic debate with a student who might be carrying a loaded gun?

Well given your past behavior, CSGV, is it a “Passionate academic debate” or is it making threats, personal attacks, and stalking behavior?

There’s a reason why they don’t want people armed. Armed people don’t tolerate bullies, and we don’t hide under our desks.

This entry was posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to More Manufactured Problems

  1. Eck says:

    >>Would YOU want to engage in a passionate academic debate with a student who might be carrying a loaded gun?

    Sure why not? I’ve had debate with friends that carry, Police officers, Miltary persons and why not a student that has achieved legal carry? Reason simple it’s debate not assault, war or armed attack.

    This idiot should get some student time in remedial english. The word “debate”
    is a clear indicator of discourse and not it’s assumed replacement of “argument”.
    Since the pants wetter willno or cannot debate he only know argue or possibly more aggressive stance. In that respect I’d suspect a student is a safer bet than him.

    They will not shoot me besides when there is the possibility of one gun in the room the likelihood of other guns in the room is equally high. Of corpse [snark intended] in “gun free” zones that is supposed to never happen.

    Eck!

  2. Suz says:

    “There’s a reason why they don’t want people armed. Armed people don’t tolerate bullies, and we don’t hide under our desks.”

    Damn straight.

  3. MattW says:

    Well, humans are pretty illogical beings, so I guess it isn’t surprising to have so many people buy into the delusion that laws prohibiting the carry of guns in certain places would stop criminals (e.g. law BREAKERS) from actually doing so. Laws that are unenforceable or are redundant in their purpose are absolutely pointless. It is already illegal to murder, batter, or assault someone. Believing that a violent criminal will care that a law says he can’t carry in X place is nothing short of true insanity.

  4. Old NFO says:

    PSH… period… If what they said was true, there SHOULD be blood in the streets!

  5. “We can crunch numbers and explore if relaxed carry and self defense laws reduce crime or have no effect, what doesn’t exist is an INCREASE of crime.”

    Citation? From what I remember of Lott’s work West Virginia had a statistically significant increase in crime. At the national level it was just swamped by a stronger and opposite trend from Florida.

  6. Tommy says:

    “Just as we saw with the Tucson shooter, our weak gun laws, particularly our lax regulation of guns in public places, make it easy for people with evil intentions to walk into sacred public spaces with guns and cause disruption, confusion, and hysteria at the very least, while being free at the worst, to commit murder.”

    Though, these laws are enough to prevent otherwise good, sober, responsible people from having the most effective tools on hand to curtail the evil activities. These laws, feeble and unenforceable though they may be, bind the law abiding forcing them to restrain or delay these evil people from harming others with only backpacks, weapons of opportunity, or in noble cases using their own bodies as shields, allowing those they are protecting the time to hopefully get away and call for help.

    I carry whenever I am allowed by law, knowing that should I ever need to use it, I have a distinct possibility of serving jail time. There is no cowards way out like the bad guys have, no nihilistic drive to take as many with me as I can. I know if I ever have to shoot someone, I will have to live with that burden or injuring or killing another human being with me until I die. The fact that the only reason I do it would be to protect my life, or the life of another, would be a very thin balm indeed.

    The evil people are still people, they have their own motivations, their own dreams and desires. I did not get my carry permit until I realized I could understand that fact without condoning it, and knowing that I had the fortitude to withstand the horrors that would assault me if I ever had to use my gun as intended.

    …That’s how I would have ended that quote.
    😀

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *