Machetes are damn dangerous weapons:
A Lawrence County man was arrested Sunday for attacking a woman with a machete.
What we’re talking about is a common gardening tool, but when wielded with murder in mind it does the job.
Hey, not a “gun Death”, so nothing to be concerned about, right?
H/T WizardPC
This one is just a multi-tiered level of discussion:
So first up we have a variant of “Gun Death” with their “In-Person Voter Fraud”, but also what a false dichotomy there! First up Guns in America are big piles of paperwork with pieces of steel attached to them, even in the most gun friendly states guns can only be manufactured for public consumption by licensed FFLs, they put every gun they make in great detail into their books, then those guns can only be sold to other FFLs who again record the guns in their books. The guns get recorded again when they are sold either to new FFLs (rinse and repeat) or to private citizens. After that the citizen doesn’t need to deal with another FFL, but that gun is now heavily papered by this point.
Then we have homicides. Do you think many homicides go unnoticed? Pretty hard to make somebody dead without SOMEBODY noticing that they aren’t alive anymore. Now SOLVING those homicides are a little more tricky, especially if the departed had some involvement with the gang system, but that isn’t relevant to this system. While not all homicides are solved, damn near all of them are RECORDED.
Now let’s look at “In Person Voter Fraud”, somebody who legally can’t vote, or who has otherwise already voted strolls into a polling place with no Voter ID requirement. All they need to do is give out a name and an address. This could be for an infirm relative, or maybe somebody who isn’t in the country, or in many cases somebody who’s dead. Hell back when the ACORN scandal was in high gear people were noting that 100% fake people were being registered to vote. A lot of nay-sayers scoffed at this since those fake people didn’t exist…but without voter ID how would you know? They could walk in, claim a ballot, vote and walk out, and even move on to the next polling place and vote again!
Now there are no cameras or recording devices at these polling place, and somebody’s dead Granny isn’t going to complain if her vote gets stolen, and further if the name is on the registered voting lists it’s LEGAL! So how are you going to tell if somebody is legitimately voting or not? Only once the election is over and the ballots are tallied can it be seen if dead people, or fake people voted, and even then with our secret ballot system, what are you going to do?
Just because so few people have been CAUGHT doesn’t mean people aren’t doing it.
And of course comes the last part. You have the right to keep and bear arms (and note that for any newly made gun that gun can ONLY get into the public with an valid ID, and given that selling guns across state lines is a serious crime, you’ll be hard pressed to find a private seller selling to a stranger without valid photo ID being exchanged) you don’t have the right to vote. There are laws that say who and when you can vote, but no law that says we need to vote at all.
Further the idea that there are registered and active voters out there who don’t have at least ONE form of valid ID is laughable. You can’t EXIST in society without State ID. Sure many people don’t drive, but if they need to buy booze or cigarettes SOMEBODY is going to card them. Do they fly, take the bus, or train? Photo ID required. Check into a hotel room? Show some ID. Open a bank account or try to pay with a Check? Can I see some ID? The list goes on!
It’s also not expensive unless the state in question (like Mine) has decided to pile on the fees out of greed. There has been some talk that immigrants who were born in other countries might have difficulties getting a birth certificate for ID…but if they’re immigrants they already had to do all that. ILLEGAL immigrants don’t have to, but they shouldn’t be able to vote.
Sorry but every case of Voter Fraud I’ve ever read about were from die-hard “Progressive” Democrats who HATE the 2nd Amendment, and this is the reason why so many people who are anti-gun want “universal background checks” but hate the idea of voter ID laws.
This is a really sick case from England:
Two women who admitted allowing a dog to maul a 79-year-old man to death in his garden have been jailed for a year
…In May 2013, Mr Clarke was “eaten alive” by the dog, which had not been fed for 45 hours, when he opened his back door while he cooked a meal.
The dog also bit the end of a police gun, Liverpool Crown Court heard.
Judge Mark Brown said Mr Clarke’s death was “entirely avoidable” and he was “literally eaten alive” as he died in “truly horrific circumstances”.
The man was torn apart and eaten by the hungry dog, and the dog was hungry because it wasn’t fed for days! They talk about the low amount of “Gun Death” in the UK, but really we’re talking about dogs being essentially weaponized and used to murder!
And they got a YEAR! You call this “Justice”?
H/T Wallphone
The first image I have is pretty straight forward:
Yep, fat, creepy, menacing, crazy-eyed, this is what all 2nd Amendment activists look like. Well except for all of them. Of course Democrats have done this before:
I know a lot of black people, and they didn’t even get the COLOR right. These don’t even look like humans. Of course that’s the point. In the Democrat-Controlled Jim Crow South they didn’t consider Black citizens as human, or even citizens.
That’s the point, and what’s going on here. Better to make the pro-gun people look more like Warcraft Orcs than humans because ENEMY! It’s much easier to hate what is alien to you, than your next door neighbor who owns guns and doesn’t support stupid laws. Hell easier to just paint us as monsters than even TALK about their political agenda because even up-front honesty is a losing strategy.
BTW have you noticed that when pro-gun cartoons occasionally pop up (The “Progressives” generally have that market cornered, but pro-liberty people can draw too!) have you noticed that the anti-gun straw is generally drawn looking like an average person, and the satire is in the actions and dialog of the anti-rights person?
I just did a quick google image search and I had to wade through dozens of anti-rights cartoons to find these two:
In the first one the violent guy and the gun control guy look pretty much the same, and given that there is no context given this is neither a positive or negative comparison, just his words set him up as illogical and irrational.
The second one the “gun control” guy is in a suit, and good looking. This is a POSITIVE image, but since he’s acting like a fool it sends the message.
Still with a reality like this:
The bulk of the anti-gun forces are aging woodstock hippies with grey hair, and upper-middle-class lives. Yet we always seem to portray anti-gun people as an everyman with a logic problem rather than an out-of-touch hippie in the Autumn of their years. I’m fine with this.
Next up is this little bit of hilarity.
http://www.pinterest.com/pin/22447698117376170/
Now here’s a question for the readers. Is this a straw man, or is it how they REALLY see the world? The gun calling the shots and the “gun nut” just along for the ride?
Also here’s a great example of standard anti-gun cartoons. Yeah we can tell both guns are supposed to be AR-Style rifles, and the sight on the one we see the most of looks a bit like a Trijicon ACOG. Still the artist has no idea how any of these devices work, so the more you look at them the more non-functional the rifles and scopes look. I mean the ejection port is on the wrong side, and looks non-functional, there’s no safety lever on the gun. The stock appears to drop off for no reason in the back. The mag well looks more like an AK-style one. What’s with all the pokey bits on that gun? I’d hate to shoot one, as it would likely feel like holding a cheese grater! Also what’s with those front sights?
They don’t understand the first thing about guns, but that doesn’t mean they’re not knowledgeable to demand their ban, and restrictions on our rights.
A lot you can learn from looking at the channels where the antis talk to each other!
A 16-year-old Utah boy pleaded guilty on Wednesday to murdering his two younger brothers by stabbing them to death at the family’s home, prosecutors said, and will serve a term of 15 years to life in prison.
No motive given, how scary is that? I also added the bad justice tag because of this:
Under a deal with prosecutors that lets him remain in juvenile detention until he is 21
…He was just 15 in May last year when prosecutors say he intentionally stabbed his two brothers, aged 10 and 4, at their home
He’s entering prison at 16 and will serve his term until he’s 21. What do they think will be accomplished in those 5 years? Do they think he’ll move on to become a pillar to society after killing his 10 and 4 year-old brothers? Sorry, I’m skeptical! But he’s being tried as a juvenile because of a plea deal. Is our justice system that hard up that they’d do this to society?
Sick!
Seems like an inevitable conclusion:
A teacher in an American prison was stabbed and violently raped after being left alone in a room full of some of the country’s worst sex offenders.
…The alleged assault took place on January 30 as the teacher, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, was giving a class with no guard nearby and just a radio for help.
They’re in prison for a damn reason! They are DANGEROUS! Yet this female teacher was left in a room alone with dangerous criminals with no means of defending herself, and look what happened!
More can be extrapolated from this case. The people who constantly trumpet “Gun Death” want to disarm good people so the entire country becomes just like this prison. You’re left alone with nothing but your cellphone to call for help. You like that idea? I sure don’t!
Forgot to post this earlier. Way to beat the heat! POOL PARTY!!!
The rubber duck means she’s mine!
Tonight on the Squirrel Report!
Our President is such a malignant narcissist that he thinks he’s humble!
Ray Nagan and his interesting prison sentence.
The odd behavior of “Progressives” and their alleged love for Marijuana.
Tortoise eggs in the Breda Zoo
Plus much more that we probably won’t get to.
Also for a call in, I’ve been talking so much about Nipple Wrenches and Ball Grease, let’s talk about nipple wrenches and ball grease WITHOUT talking about guns!
so tune in at 9pm EST and join the discussion by calling 214-530-0036.
IT’S THE SQUIRREL REPORT!!!
Facebook has allowed the “Kill Kendall Jones” community page to stay, despite deleting several of the Texas teen’s hunting photos for violating the social media network’s animal abuse policies.
Kendall Jones, a 19-year-old cheerleader and avid hunter, sparked outrage and admiration with online photos of her trophy kills.
Facebook deleted a series of photos that showed her posing with a variety of animals, including a leopard and a lion, that she had shot earlier this month on safari in Zimbabwe.
The pictures were said to break a rule about “graphic images shared for sadistic effect or to celebrate or glorify violence,” as outlined in this page on Facebook Community Standards, Mashable reported.
“We remove reported content that promotes poaching of endangered species, the sale of animals for organized fight or content that includes extreme acts of animal abuse,” a Facebook spokesperson told Mashable.
But Juneau Empire reporter Matt Woolbright noticed the stunning contradiction when he tried to report the “Kill Kendall Jones” community page, and Facebook said it didn’t violate their standards.
Now first let’s talk about big game hunting in Africa. I say “Hunting” and not “Poaching” because this young woman followed all the laws. Few hunters ever bag any of the Big Five in Africa, and this young woman is past most of some of the best hunters in the world right now. Most don’t do it because it is VERY expensive. Besides travel and equipment, the permits and fees, as well as hiring a guide is MONSTER money. Monster money to a part of the world where what we blow on dinner and drinks in one night might support an entire village for a week! You see big game hunting in Africa not only drives their economy, but it drives conservation of animals that have been in trouble for years.
The guides search out animals that should be culled for conservation, and money not only supports the people who make sure there will always be animals to hunt, but it helps pay for them to combat poachers which have no qualms of wiping these great animals off the face of the planet. Areas where Safari hunting happen are actually doing very well with conserving their populations, while areas with prohibition on hunting are struggling to keep the poachers at bay.
Now let’s look deeper into the evil of Facebook. The pages demanding this woman’s death have the VERY SAME PICTURES Facebook deleted as a “violation”. This is obviously selective enforcement of the rules by Facebook, and think about what they’re promoting!
They are admonishing a woman for traveling to another part of the world and engaging in a sport that helps people in that troubled nation alive, and promotes protection of the vary animals she killed, but they are SUPPORTING the people who want a woman who has done nothing wrong to die or be murdered!
Disgusting!
This image has been blowing up in the anti-gun circles, as well as the circles of “Progressives” in general.
So the pro-gun saying goes: Owning a Piano does not make you a pianist. I own a REALLY nice keyboard, and the only (and I mean ONLY) song I can play on it is “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star” (OK I can also play “Baa Baa Black Sheep” and the Alphabet Song…but since they’re all the same song that isn’t saying much). I have a few sheet music samples of a few Warren Zevon songs that I plan to learn, but I haven’t logged any practice so I can’t play them.
Yep, I own a piano, sheet music, and training books, but I can’t play crap. See the tools mean crap. Now I used to play a little piano and used to be able to read sheet music by sight, and I’m familiar with all these songs, but that was 15 years ago when I last seriously was playing music. If I practiced more seriously I could probably have a lot to show for all this, but I simply haven’t committed to that time.
Now let’s look at the PEOPLE and their actions in the pictures. From the article the American woman is simply a conservative woman who uses social media to support her conservative beliefs against abortion, and defense of the 2nd Amendment, and the 1st Amendment, specifically as a Christian. She’s a married mother with no criminal history.
The other woman is this beast.
She’s a radical Muslim convert from Ireland who is now a fugitive from justice for a laundry list of terrorist acts.
So there’s the difference. One is an average woman standing up for the enumerated rights in the US Constitution, rights that “Progressives” who have been posting this image around the internet have ZERO respect for. The other is a dangerous terrorist who has been involved with several mass murders and has expressed desire to kill many more.
I’d say the difference is HUGE!
Now let’s zoom back to the broader scope, and some lovely “Progressive” projection. Let’s blank out the faces or change the identity of the two women, and just make them both generic people in context of the background. Now Ms. Fisher is about as average a woman as they come. There is nothing unique to her views, really the only thing that stands her against the average conservative woman is the fire in her belly about defending her rights, and her above average good looks. (Which I mean in all due respect from a married man to a married woman. You’re gorgeous, and I’m glad you’re using your photogenic nature to defend our rights)
Now let’s make a generic Islamic woman behind the green flag of Islam with a rifle and her Koran. Maybe she’s one of the women fighting against the oppressive regimes of the many Islamic theocracies out there, like the many women we saw in the Iranian uprising a few years ago. Many of whom gave their lives for freedom they never got.
If that was the case I’d say “You go Girl!” because most Muslim women are NOT international terrorists, or mass murderers, and a rifle in a woman’s hand only represents power, and nothing else.
The “Progressives” assume that since they HATE Ms. Fisher so much for not letting them trample our rights, and not standing down to our corrupt government, that people on the other side of the debate have as much hate as they do.
Nope. I called the terrorist a “Beast”, not because she’s a woman, or a Muslim, or even because she’s holding a rifle and a Koran. I called her a beast because she has been party to, and wants to continue to kill innocent people. Hell that’s why I own guns, in case some asshole like her wants to kill me or mine, I can kill them first and live my merry life.
I don’t care what race, creed, or sexual orientation you are, all I care about is the content of your character.
So yeah, I’d say there is a lot of differences between the two images, and if the differences I enumerated above weren’t there, I wouldn’t care one wit about armed women.
Because Unlike “Progressives” my primary motivation is not hate.
