Weer'd World

I just got thinking. Have you noticed that the people who twist the bible to turn Jesus and Moses into anti-gun Pacifists with strong Socialist tendencies are the same people who don’t think very highly of practicing Christians and Jews? Being Anti-Freedom, I suspect they’re just as hostile to the sections of the 1st Amendment that protect the rights to religion and peaceful assembly, as they are against the right to keep and bear arms.

Further you often hear the nonsense of “Nobody hunts with an AR-15/AK-47” which is untrue…but whenever you hear people say that, how excited are they about the next hunting season? How many deer tags do they have?

They talk about “Respecting the Rights of Sportsmen” (which is bullshit) yet they likely consider the sport of hunting and target shooting to be “backwards” and “Barbaric”.

Not only is your argument invalid, but even if it was, you’d be all for dumb “Common Sense” crap for how people shoot ducks and deer, or poke holes in paper.

The best we’ve seen is POSSIBLY an old-timer with a Winchester 70, or Browning Auto 5 that their Grandfather bought at Sears before the Gun Control Act of ’68, and a box of shells where you can barely read the writing on the old cardboard, who probably hasn’t been out in a deer stand or a duck blind for years because the cold acts up on their arthritis.

The “Fudds” are a dying breed, I have yet to meet a young hunter who doesn’t have at least one gun threatened by the pending bans, and given how many of them are returning service men, a bolt action rifle just feels foreign in their hands while an AR-style rifle fits them like a glove, hence why so many of them are in the field these days.

And frankly I bet 90% of the “I’m a gun owner but…” Fudds aren’t even hunters, but anti-rights activists who have more sympathy for PETA than they do for Duck Dynasty.

Sorry antis, but my guns aren’t for ducks and deer, and the guns the Founding Fathers had weren’t either. Further the guns you’re currently elevating as “Safe” and “Valid” do just about the same things, and since you could care less about hunting, where do you think your sights will align if you ever get your way.

Thankfully we’ll likely never know!

Hopefully this “Win” will soon become a loss:

A New York state judge agreed Friday to consider whether the state’s tough new gun restrictions were rushed into law in violation of the state constitution.

State Supreme Court Justice Gerald Connolly signed an order granting the request for a hearing by plaintiffs who are challenging Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s decision to waive the three-day review usually required before votes on bills, according to LoHud.com.

The plaintiffs argue the law violates the guarantees of free speech, property ownership and the right to petition the government guaranteed under the state and federal constitutions.

Plaintiff Robert Schulz called Cuomo a “king” for pushing through the nation’s toughest gun law by suspending the three-day vetting period by submitting a “message of necessity” on the law, which allows the constitutional waiting period to be suspended.

Again, anti-freedom, not anti-gun. Let’s hope the courts do the right thing!