Justice

This is good news!

The Fifth District Court of Appeals in Daytona, Fla., voted 2-1 that Lester should be disqualified. Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara, had appealed to the court in early July for Lester to be removed.

His motion to disqualify the judge came in response to Lester’s order setting Zimmerman’s bail at $1 million. In it Lester wrote that Zimmerman had “flaunted the system” and practiced “deception upon the court” after it was revealed that Zimmerman and his wife Shellie had not told the court he had two passports and tried to hide the amount of money their defense fund had raised. record. They were also accused of speaking in code in reference to their assets.

The bottom line in all of this case is that the police conducted a through investigation in the days surrounding the shooting, and found no evidence of wrongdoing. The evidence was released and not only did Zimmerman have potentially life-threatening injuries, and no evidence of malice towards Martin, but his story stayed consistent over the days of stressful interrogation, and all of his details line up with the evidence collected.

Everything after that was 100% political, and abuse of the justice system. Good for Florida for taking out the trash!

Posted in Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Eating His Lunch

Can’t Compare guns with cars!

An elderly man was killed in downtown Manhattan Thursday after an SUV slammed into him and pinned him against a wall, authorities and witnesses said.

Because “Progressives” drive cars, but don’t own or carry guns, so only “Gun Deaths” count. Your life is only significant if it suits their selfish needs!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

More “Progressives” being “Progressive”

Always nice when you’re around a “Progressive” Protest:

A man staying at a makeshift protest camp near the Republican National Convention has been arrested and charged with armed battery on a fellow camper.

Tampa Police say 24-year-old Dante M. Sea was charged with aggravated battery Tuesday after he hit 60-year-old Eddie Thomas and broke Thomas’ jaw.

Oh, I can add the “Gun Death” tag too! Gotta Love “Progressives”, if it wasn’t for them this blog might be hard to write!

(Les is a HUGE help too! Keep those stories coming, buddy!)

Posted in Gun Death?, Politics, Safety | Leave a comment

We Need More Rules!!!

I wasn’t going to post this story, but this one detail I found amusing:

According to police and court documents, the younger Gladden brought a disassembled shotgun, 21 rounds of ammunition and a bottle of vodka with him for the first day of school Monday morning. On his Facebook page, he wrote, “First day of school, last day of my life.”

Odd, I thought minors couldn’t posses alcohol, and certainly can’t bring it to school! Hell I knew a guy who was probably a pre-hipster who carried a hip flask in school, filled with benign beverages, or just water. He got in trouble and was threatened with suspension if he brought it to school again. He had a point that a hip flask itself isn’t a bad item, and his was a vintage item he snagged at a thrift store, and he was quite proud of it. Still I have a few hip flasks that I’ve acquired over time, and overall I don’t find much use in them, as they’re small and don’t really hold much more than to give you a good buzz if you down most of it in a sitting. I bring mine camping when I want to take a quick snort around the camp fire and pass it around, but I never saw the point when I see my pulp/noir heroes pulling out a flask and taking a quick hit when things got stressful.

Still its not like he was quenching his thirst with it, he was simply carrying it to make a scene, and there was always the potential that if the authorities got permissive he probably would have filled it up with rot-gut for drinking between periods.

Again, rules are ONLY useful for punishment, not CHANGING behavior. So why have rules that punish GOOD behavior, like lawful adults carrying guns when they go to work, pick up their kids, or attend functions?

Posted in Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Biology Duhh

I could have told you that:

For 25 years, the rhesus monkeys were kept semi-starved, lean and hungry. The males’ weights were so low they were the equivalent of a 6-foot-tall man who tipped the scales at just 120 to 133 pounds. The hope was that if the monkeys lived longer, healthier lives by eating a lot less, then maybe people, their evolutionary cousins, would, too. Some scientists, anticipating such benefits, began severely restricting their own diets.

The results of this major, long-awaited study, which began in 1987, are finally in. But it did not bring the vindication calorie restriction enthusiasts had anticipated. It turns out the skinny monkeys did not live any longer than those kept at more normal weights. Some lab test results improved, but only in monkeys put on the diet when they were old. The causes of death – cancer, heart disease – were the same in both the underfed and the normally fed monkeys.

Now we know that if you smoke a pack-of-nails a day, drink like a fish, or blow up to massive proportions you’re taking years off your life. Then again there are prominent figures like George Burns and Marlon Brando who treated their bodies like abject shit and lived to a ripe old age, meanwhile, while killers like cancer and heart disease can be caused by environmental factors, are also simply genetic time bombs.

And remember, none of these monkeys got hit by a drunk driver on their way to work one morning.

So it all boils down to what the non-fad assholes have been saying all along. Take care of yourself. Live an active life, and keep yourself fit. Eat good food, and don’t eat too much.

Hey, but if you really enjoy some greasy food like Pig-Wings (h/t Mrs. Weer’d on that gem!), or you want to enjoy a cigar and a few snifters of good scotch on a warm summer evening, or snack on the Doritos and cheap domestic beer while you watch the game on the tube.

Live a little, because being a half-starved monkey in a cage is no way to live!

Posted in Biology, Freedom | Leave a comment

Even in “Utopia”, Criminals Get Guns

Even in the UK

Nearly 3,000 guns were lost by or stolen from people registered to hold them in the past five years, according to figures obtained by the BBC.

More than half of these weapons were shotguns.

The data was released following a Freedom of Information request to the Home Office.

The Gun Control Network, a group which raises awareness of the dangers of guns, called the figures “horrendous and frightening”.

A Home Office spokesman said firearms legislation protects public safety while ensuring controls are practical and proportionate.

The reason why so many of them are shotguns, as that’s one of the easiest guns to get in the UK.

And of course their anti-rights goons are fixing for MORE restrictions (BTW they are the same people who made it a serious crime to have a Swiss Army knife in your pocket, and allowing the police to search you if they fucking feel like it). You think our anti-rights cult are any different?

Posted in Guns, Politics, Safety | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Wildfire

Five counts of murder, no “Gun Death”.

SAN BERNARDINO, Calif. (AP) – A jury on Wednesday found a California man guilty of murdering five people who had heart attacks after he deliberately started a blaze that ballooned into a massive wildfire.

Jurors in San Bernardino found 30-year-old Rickie Fowler guilty of setting the Old Fire in the foothills above San Bernardino in October 2003 that burned 91,000 acres and torched 1,000 buildings over nine days.

Those people would be alive if he hadn’t been a malicious asshole. I hope he makes lots of life-long friendships in Prison!

Note that the anti-rights people who are so enraged when there are 2-3 people SHOT, but don’t give a shit when 5 people die due to arson. This is why they are blood dancers, they care nothing of human life, just their agenda!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

A Good Movie, and Han Shot First!

Just finished watching this great film:

Its on Netflix instant watch so go see it, its a really good discussion of art, intellectual property, pop culture, and fandom.

There’s lots of issues discussed in this film, some happy, some angry, and some contentious.

The one I really got thinking about is Han Shooting First:

In the origonal film Han Solo encounters Greedo, a bounty hunter working for Jabba The Hutt. Greedo gloats about delivering Han to Jabba for a massive debt from a failed smuggling run. Cornered, and facing certain death, Han shoots Greedo and then soon flees the planet with Luke, Obi Wan, and the Droids.

In the new film Greedo improbably shoots at Han and misses, and Han then RETURNS fire, killing Greedo.

It seems all the arguments in the film mention that it changes the characters. Greedo goes from being a menace to a buffoon, and Han goes from being a dangerous anti-hero to a typical old-school white-hat cowboy hero.

It got me thinking about the Trayvon Martin killing. An artificial controversy in the case is the specter of racism. (Nobody claims that Han shot Greedo because he was a Rodian, and Han is anti-Alien or Anti-Rodian) But the BIG controversy is that Martin was a minor, and was unarmed when he was shot.

I personally suspect that like Han, Zimmerman was facing certain death at the moment he shot Martin, but who knows? I mean maybe Greedo would have attempted to capture Han only to be freed by Chewbacca, or maybe Luke or Obi Wan.

This also got me thinking about myself. Could I “Shoot First” when I was facing only PROBABLE death, say group of posturing, but unarmed males wearing gang colors? I’ve never been in that situation, so I can’t say if I can or can not. I might freeze up. I might hesitate and be killed.

Han shooting first says a LOT about his character. He’s cool-headed, tough, and isn’t afraid to kill to save his skin.

With Greedo shooting first it makes Han look more meek. Maybe if Greedo hadn’t shot he would have gone willingly. Maybe if he could have run away he would have. Maybe Han only shot because he was frightened by the shot fired at him.

It totally changes the film!

Posted in Guns, Movies, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Why I do the “Gun Death” Thing.

This email from Tango was in my archives for for a future “Gun Death” Files post. As many of you know, I typically only post one “Gun Death” story per day unless its a special story, also about 99% of my “Gun Death” stories are supplied by readers. Because of this when I get a “Gun Death” story I simply sort it into a special folder and save it for a time when I’m refilling the syndication scheduled. So this story is older, and I wish I had published it when I first got it.

Gun homicides were down last year in New York City. But according to a report published in the New York Times, authorities say the number of killings committed with knives or other “cutting instruments” rose 50 percent. New York Police Department spokesman Paul Browne theorizes that authorities have made it harder for killers to get their hands on guns. But it’s easy to legally acquire knives.

Now I’ve read many reports that the NYPD might be “adjusting” crime reports to make the city look safer than it is. I’ll let you decide how legitimate the drop in “Gun Death” in NYC is for yourself, but taking this story on its merits shows one of the big reason why I took up this project.

The tag line is this:

Overall, homicides rose slightly. There were 523 last year, up from 496 in 2007.

So according to these numbers “Gun Death” is down, but overall homicides are up. For People who use “Gun Death” as a metric NYC became SAFER, as “Gun Deaths” were down, but for people living (and DYING) in NYC the city is MORE DANGEROUS!

Of course the other reason why I do the “Gun Death” files is to also show that a world without guns would NOT be a world without murder, but like the times before the discovery of black powder, it would be a world where the strong have power over the weak.

In the middle and dark ages of time women were essentially property. Why? Because men are stronger than woman, and if a woman attempted to stand up to men they would lose. Weapons like knives, swords, clubs, and bows all required strength to effectively use. A woman, the elderly, or people of slight stature or strength simply couldn’t compete to violence. As Marko said: “The Gun is Civilization”. In martial arts competitions the competitors are divided up by sex and weight, simply because they can’t directly compete, no matter how skilled they are. Of course there are no referees or officials on the street that make sure attackers only fight their own weight and skill class, nor do they forbid GROUPS from attacking single targets. Now add in the gun. I’ve taken many people to the range for their first shots, young and old, big and small, male and female, their shooting skills with appropriate firearms is only a direct is only related to how well I can teach and how well they can pick up the shooting basics. If they have a good stance and grip, make a good sight picture, and exercise good trigger control they will ALL land shots in the black of an NRA slow-fire target.

Add in some repetition and they’ll be as competent shot as anybody else, and their physical capabilities will only be an issue when you really start pushing things outside the standard realm of defensive shootings. No, you generally won’t need a .44 Magnum or a .454 Casull to stop an attacker, a .38 Special or a 9×19 firearm will likely do as well as anything else, and with the current selections of firearms ANYBODY can get a gun that they can effectively conceal, carry, deploy and most importantly AFFORD. These guns will allow them to not only fend off more powerful attackers, but MULTIPLE attackers (even when you discount that many group attacks will scatter when a defensive weapon is produced, or one of the attackers is neutralized).

So effectively the gun neutralizes direct force as a tactic to be used. By eliminating lawful guns you foster “Might Equals Right”.

So this is why I run the “Gun Death” Files. Also I’ll remind my readers that the “Gun Death” tag is there for YOU to not only read but USE! When you see somebody using “Gun Death” as if it is a legitimate metric, let them give my files a read, and see if the literally HUNDREDS of entries sway them. (BTW I just did a quick count and I’m well over 800 entries, almost all of them murders at the time of writing this)

And carry your damn guns!

Posted in Gun Death?, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Morning Joan Peterson Quote

Really busy and didn’t get a ton of sleep last night, so blogging might be a bit light today. So I’ll just go to the orchard of low-hanging fruit:

Bryan- I have conceded that point to you. I hold permit holders to a higher standard because they are carrying deadly weapons that can result in death and injury. One violent crime committed by a permit holder is one too many. You guys are supposed to be law abiding folks. That was the deal when the law was passed. And yet, in many states, people who have committed misdemeanors are allowed to carry guns. Dangerously mentally ill people get permits. They shouldn’t. The laws are too loose. We don’t need people with guns walking around in public. Prevention is better than taking a chance. You guys have not made us any safer. That is also very true. You have no proof otherwise. So we could easily go back to May Issue laws and we would be none the worse for it and we wouldn’t be taking a chance on giving out permits to people who are potentially irresponsible with guns. Permit holders shouldn’t be committing any crimes. They are supposed to be law abiding.

What’s really neat is permit holders ARE held to higher standards. Most infractions done by somebody with a carry permit result in a permanent revocation of the permit, and often felony charges that carry serious jail time. She’s “Conceding the Point” (quotes, because not really, she’s just moving the goal posts in the face of facts) because this WORKS. I really don’t think people with permits are saints or better people than those without guns or permits. Just the stakes are SO much higher, that people heed the law much more stringently.

Also isn’t it nice that Joan holds US more accountable than her own compatriots? Permit holders should be following the law at 100% while gun control activists commit crimes, and cozy up with criminals.

Meanwhile she’s complaining about people with misdemeanors or arrests with no convictions. And of course I’d love to see how we’re supposed to stop people with undiagnosed mental conditions, or conditions that are only known within a Doctor’s confidence (which is required to be broken if the Doctor is concerned about crimes or dangers). I suspect Joan wants her band of felons and lunatics to have access to our private information. Anti-freedom, not anti-gun!

And on a similar tin-ear vein:

Your article proves nothing. To even use the word positive experience with carrying a loaded gun around in public is an oxymoron. What has been positive about it? The article shows nothing new. Crime is going down all over the U.S. and it has nothing provable to do with people carrying guns. In fact, since crime is going down, you guys really don’t need your guns in public do you? Gun deaths and injuries remain about the same as they have been for the past 10 years or so. There has been no reduction in gun deaths due to people carrying guns. In fact, some of the permit holders have been shooting people in public places, accounting for some of the deaths.

So she’s repeating the boilerplate from the previous comment. Mouth open, mind closed! “Common Sense”…yeah!

Still what is interesting is that permits are WAYYY up, states with shall-issue permits, liberalized carry laws, and permit-less carry are at a record high. Gun sales, and new people joining the gun owning populous are at an all-time high….and crime is at its lowest in DECADES, even with a crappy economy and record high unemployment!

She’s right about the “Gun Death” numbers, its roughly 30,000 every year. Its been the same for decades, hell I’m amused that this number is quoted in “Runaway Jury” that’s a decade old, and it was the very same number I cited back when I was on the anti-gun side.

Obviously carry permits have nothing to do with this number, nor the number of guns in private hands, or the availability of “military-style” guns or ammunition magazines. We all know that correlation does NOT equal causation, but causation cannot exist without correlation. Hey but Joan isn’t going to be stopped by logic, reason, or rationality! She has “Common Sense”, don’t you know!

Of course there IS a correlation that more people carrying and owning guns and crime going down. It may not be a causation, but it very well could be. Certainly it isn’t HURTING, so I think I’ll err on the side of liberty and carry my damn guns.

Joan never errs on the side of liberty, because she HATES it with all her being.

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment