George does a glut of it. REALLY impressive graphics on death in America.
and Here
Go read the posts and look at the graphics…then email them to your favorite anti!
George does a glut of it. REALLY impressive graphics on death in America.
and Here
Go read the posts and look at the graphics…then email them to your favorite anti!
Found here the words of simpleton and troll…but overall representative of the “Progressive” mindset, Ubu52.
The freedom you most commonly refer to is what’s known as “negative liberty” or freedom from outside restraint. I would prefer to have effective freedom or the ability to do whatever it is I want to do….I want the same freedoms the really wealthy have: The freedom to fly to Paris for dinner, for example. I want effective liberty, not negative liberty. I already have negative liberty as far as I am concerned. Now I want more.
My Response: bu, you CAN fly to Paris for dinner, and eat at the fanciest restaurant there.
Of course what you can’t do is do that on your own. You need a pilot, you need an aircraft, you need out-of-country transportation, you need a restaurant, you need a master chef, and all the ingredients and equipment to ply his trade, and you need waitstaff.
The insanely rich are no less free than you, but they do have a commodity that all of the above people would be willing to exchange their time, and resources on, and that’s money.
What you propose is the ability to board a plane in California, fly to Paris, hail a car in Paris and get the driver to take you to the restaurant of your choice. Ask the staff to show you to your table, and direct them which meal you’ll be served that evening. Afterwards you’re saying you’d like to hail another car to take you to the airport where you will return home.
All of this you feel you should be able to do without compensating the countless people who bore your little dream on their backs.
That is called “Slavery”.
You may go a step further and demand that I, and many others who either don’t know you, or from what they read here and in other blogs can conclude that you are nothing short of a lousy human being pay for your dreams out of our own pockets, without so much as you even knowing our names, let alone giving an ounce of gratitude for.
Is that better, or worse? At least with the first scenario you’d have the stones to look down your nose at the human you were commanding around, the 2nd Scenario you wouldn’t even be in the same Continent…
You should be ashamed of yourself.
And on MLK day of all things! BTW I had never heard much about “Negative” and “Positive” Liberty before.
It all sounds like a bunch of philosophical navel-gazing hooey. Either you have Liberty or you don’t, I guess the difference between my world view and Ubu’s is that I think people should be free unless they abuse the freedoms of others, meanwhile Ubu thinks that SHE should be free, and her “Liberty” should be at the expense of the liberty of others.
What’s scary is this is NOT a mentality unique to her. Just look at the Kill the Jews protesters. They’re unemployable and generally the worst of society, an they demand that they are given goods and services BECAUSE THEY WANT.
They should ALL be ashamed, but they aren’t.
I love Kris Kristofferson’s music. I think he’s one of America’s greatest Song Writers. I didn’t know this about him.
Wow!
h/t Kevin
Sure internet discussions can always degrade to just mindless arguing, but I’m not a fan of “Godwin’s Law”, as the Nazi Police state is a great example of the break down of humanity in the name of Utopian Tyranny.
McThag makes a great argument. Those who call “Godwin” would be ignoring an amazing warning from history.
Go read it.
Today is the day we Celebrate Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s birthday, and reflect on the impression he left on the globe.
Today we have a President of African descent.
While Dr. King was receiving threats (and was later assassinated) he was denied a gun permit to defend himself. Today anybody without a criminal history in all but a few States (all of those in the “Enlightened” North, and California, which was the places the world looked to during the battle to end Segregation) cannot be denied a permit for the defense of themselves and their loved ones. Denials on race, creed, or political views (the reasons Dr. King was denied) are now a criminal act by the Police.
Of course the segregation is totally gone and the vast majority of Americans don’t really take skin color particularly seriously.
Meanwhile the inner cities, and particularly the Black and Hispanic Communities are awash with crime and gang culture. Celebrities who have risen above this underworld squalor glorify this culture.
Our President was a member of a Black Supremacist Church, and when the media found out about this racist past, nobody really paid it much mind.
While things have gotten so good in America that the big “Protest” in the nation is an unorganized and unmotivated rabble camping out in public parks. Sadly most of these groups quickly degenerate to antisemitism.
And On the Reverend’s Birthday yesterday President Obama promoted a lobbyist who’s claim to fame was a prominent position with a Hispanic activist group that’s name translates to “The Race”.
We’ve come so far, Dr. King, but for somebody who was never alive when you were, and who lives in a world where you have always been heralded as a hero, I’m disappointed at how little progress we have made since your tragic passing.
Still I’m working as hard as I can to bring your dream to life, and I’m not alone.
Now this is an interesting story.
Calling it a “tragically bizarre” case, an Illinois appeals court has ruled that a man killed by a train while crossing the tracks at a Chicago Metra station can be held responsible after part of his body struck and injured a bystander.
In 2008, Hiroyuki Joho, 18, was hurrying in the pouring rain with an umbrella over his head, trying to catch a Metra train, when he was struck by an Amtrak train traveling at more than 70 mph….A large portion of his body flew about 100 feet onto the southbound platform, where it struck Gayane Zokhrabov, then 58. She was knocked to the ground, her leg and wrist broken and her shoulder injured.
A Cook County judge dismissed Zokhrabov’s lawsuit against Joho’s estate, finding that Joho could not have anticipated Zokhrabov’s injuries.
But the appellate court disagreed. After noting that the case law involving “flying bodies” is sparse, it ruled that “it was reasonably foreseeable” that the high-speed train would kill Joho and fling his body toward a platform where people were waiting.
A strange case, and I don’t know how relevant all the legal details will be, but I will note that the death and injury were NOT caused by a gun. No “Gun Death”, no big deal.
h/t Wallphone
This article starts like this:
am a gun owner. I like to shoot, and although I don’t hunt, I am perfectly fine with the sport. Having gotten that out of the way, I would like to address the three bills to deregulate firearms use in New Hampshire.
COME ON! Keep with the Meme, you just need to say “I’m a Gun Owner But…” before going on an ignorant anti-freedom diatribe. So -1 for efficiency, and -2 for ignoring the Meme you’re a part of. Continuing:
First, regarding allowing guns on campus: What are you thinking? State law doesn’t entrust 18- to 20-year-olds with a beer, but the sponsor of the bill thinks that having guns on campus is okay? College students go to parties and drink. Drinking and guns don’t mix. Additionally, violence and sexual crime is enough of a problem on campuses without having guns to add to the threat.
Read the law, smarty-pants. The Guns on Campus would Petain to people 21+, given our current situations, most of those students will be returning veterans, you know, the people we were entrusting with Machine Guns, explosives, artillery, and air support, and rewarded them with the GI bill that let them go to college. But a nice enlightened gun owner would say these American heroes can’t be trusted with guns on US soil, and they’re just drunken rape-machines, right?
Regarding the second bill, to allow residents to carry concealed weapons without a permit, we already have a liberal permitting process. It doesn’t take much vetting to get a permit, but it does weed out a few people who shouldn’t have guns. Not everyone should have a gun. There are people who don’t have the temperament to be responsible gun owners even if they have the “right” to own one.
First up: NO. New Hampshire is a “Shall Issue” state, if you pay your $10 and fill out the form, if you can legally own a gun you can legally carry one. There is no “Weeding” because such “Weeding” outside of the federal laws that govern us all is ILLEGAL. As for your last bit, there are some people so ignorant that they aren’t responsible enough to write a letter to a local paper, let alone dictate State law…but we have the 1st Amendment and here you are Mr. Wiener! Be thankful the world isn’t run by people like you, it would suck!
Lastly, why put loaded rifles and shotguns in a vehicle? So you can jack deer more easily? Or shoot at tailgaters? Since hunting rifles and shotguns are sporting arms and you can’t shoot from a roadway, what possible justification can there be for this bill?
Three for Three, that’s consistent! First up, gun rights aren’t about sport shooting and hunting. Second what harm does this bill bring? It’s illegal to road hunt, it’s illegal to shoot over traffic offences, and its illegal to poach game. Either laws stop behavior, or they don’t. Which is it?
In short, it is a waste of time and taxpayer money to debate bills which will not produce benefit for the state, will result in increased danger to law enforcement personnel, and reinforce to the rest of the country why they shouldn’t come here to vacation, attend college or even drive on the highway.
So says you. Maybe you want to step back and let the grown ups handle this issue. It seems to be a bit complicated for you.
I don’t got much today, but Cemetery has a great post up on the history of Gun Control in New Jersey.
A LOT of work went into that post, and Free state people should read to see how those freedoms got lost.
Seems this post has inspired others.
Go Read Cargosquid and Thirdpower.
Joan thinks her thoughts are “Common Sense”, but we can see the madness!