There is a major problem with one of the lines in this article:
A gun-rights activist is taking the city of Phoenix back to court over its refusal to put up a bus-stop ad that declares “Guns Save Lives.”
The case is as much about the First Amendment as it is about the Second. The Arizona Republic reports that the three-year legal battle is heading to the Arizona Court of Appeals on Tuesday.
The decision could have sweeping implications for free speech in the state, and on whether advertisers should be limited in what topics they can and cannot address on city property.
The battle started when the city removed 50 of the ads, put up by activist Alan Korwin, from city bus stops.
This case has NOTHING to do with the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd Amendment is the right to keep and bear arms. The right to talk about guns, and to research if indeed guns do save lives is all in the 1st Amendment.
Also I would say there IS a 1st Amendment right in what can be published on the property of others. There are blogs I will not cite or discuss. They’re on my much talked-about “Black List”, I have no issue that those blogs exist, or continue to operate, but I will not use MY blog to further their garbage.
Still this is PUBLIC space, and the rules state that if you pay for the signage you can post the signage. The Public is the Government, and the Government both has no rights, and has the Amendments of the Constitution, of both the United States, and the State of Arizona to remind it what it can and cannot do.
Hopefully the courts will note that this is one of those things it cannot do, and it is in the wrong.
