Some Local “Gun Deaths”

These are the headlines today, thought I’d add them to the count. First more trouble in Dorchester:

Boston Police report a man, 26, was stabbed on Park Street around 7:45 p.m. He was taken to Boston Medical Center in serious condition, but is expected to survive, police say.

Another man was stabbed outside the Bowdoin Street Health Center around 11:30 a.m.

Hey, but no “Gun Death”. Gun control is a success!

And this:

A woman was in critical condition Wednesday after police say she was found severely beaten inside a Methuen home Tuesday.

Police searched the home at 605 Lowell Street early Wednesday morning as they investigated. They say they received a 911 call around 4 p.m. Tuesday from someone who lives inside the home and later found the 33-year-old woman with severe head wounds and a violent scene inside the house when they arrived.

Again, no “Gun Death” because the tools used are so important!

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Beard Facts

Via Jack. This is just awesome!

Don’t shave, men. It isn’t good for you!

Posted in Biology, Random | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Chain Reaction

Interesting story:

A Cleveland woman has been indicted on aggravated murder charges in the fatal stabbing of her best friend and the death of her own 2-year-old daughter, who was struck when the stabbed woman tried to drive away….Police say Black went into her house, got a knife and stabbed Swain, who stepped on the gas pedal and hit Black’s two young children, one of whom died.

She started a chain reaction that lead to a death…not to mention attempting to kill others.

One thing that isn’t in this story in any way is guns, so no “Gun Death”.

h/t Whipped Cream Difficulties

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

More Dumb from Wintermute

This piece is so poorly written I’m amazed!

UC Davis study: Women, children frequently hurt by stray bullets

Man, I’ve heard of “Heat Seeking Bullets”, but never “Women and Children Seeking Bullets”….also neither has anybody else, because that’s all that’s mentioned in this story about that….seriously.

“Stray-bullet shootings alter the nature of life in many American neighborhoods, creating fear and anxiety and prompting parents to keep children indoors and take other precautions,” Wintemute said. “When we think about gun violence, we think about high-profile and tragic events like Virginia Tech or the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. But stray-bullet shootings affect entire communities every day, and there has been almost no research exploring them.”

Almost no research. Well given that Dr. Wintemute is on the scene that won’t change. We’ve seen what he’s attempted to pass off as “Research” in the past(PDF warning).

Within that framework, the study team identified 284 stray-bullet shootings events, in which 317 people were killed or injured. Most of the people shot (81 percent) were unaware of the events leading to the gunfire that caused their injuries. Of the 65 people who died during the monitoring period, most died on the day they were shot, and many died at the shooting scene.

The shootings were concentrated in big cities, and included scenarios involving violent conflicts (59.2 percent), hunting and other shooting sports (7.4 percent), and unknown activities (22.9 percent). Despite its frequent occurrence, celebratory gunfire related to holidays such as July 4th caused relatively few stray bullet injuries, accounting for less than 5 percent of the cases.

Ahhh Google as a research tool, that’s some “Hard science” right there. Also looks like the vast majority is urban street violence, not lawful shooting gone awry. What’s Wintemute’s solution?

Wintemute said he hopes the findings will raise awareness of stray-bullet shooting and help lead to the expansion of preventive measures, such as “hot-spot policing,” which involves increasing enforcement of firearm laws in areas with high levels of gun violence.

By “Hot Spots” you mean “known Gang Territory”, right? Who’s going to enforce these laws? Local cops are already unwilling to go into gang turf for foot beats and cruiser patrol, as the gangs don’t take kindly to LEOs.

So more intellectual masturbation from the pointy-headed “Progressive” ivory tower!

Good stuff!

Posted in Guns, Safety | Leave a comment

Reloading Your Pocket Pistol

With more people carrying smaller guns for concealed carry and convenience, one must take into account the trade-offs of the smaller guns:

The smaller grip means you need to be careful of getting your hand clear of the well before you slam your reload home.

I must say here’s another instance where I am madly in love with my PM45:

Because the Kahr has such a low bore axis I can get all 3 of my fingers around the grip frame, despite it being the same size as the LC9 in the video.

Also one reason why I switched from a S&W642 to the PM45 was not only that the gun offered more power and capacity than the 5-shot .38, but also you aren’t constrained by the gun’s base capacity:

Here’s my Kahr after a theoretical reload with a 7-round magazine designed for the TP45 Kahr does make a 7-round .45 magazine with a grip extension, but I have no idea how well it mates up with the short PM45 grip. I also don’t care, as grip extensions just give more surface area to pinch the meat of your palm. I’ve run a few hundred rounds through these magazines, and the grip size of the gun generally keeps my pinkie from pressing the mag, even if it did start to rub that doesn’t effect feeding, and on reload I have 7 or 7+1 rounds of .45 ACP +P on tap in a gun that rides in a pocket holster! That’s pretty impressive!

Great little gun!

Carry your damn guns people, and be safe out there!

Posted in Guns, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Robb and the Facts of SYG

Robb Allen writes up a nice fact sheet of talking points for Stand Your Ground Laws.

If you live in Florida you NEED these facts to help combat the misinformation being used to attack SYG, and repeal it for the safety of criminal in Florida.

For those of us in the other states, if we have SYG it is also under attack. If you don’t have a SYG law, your state really needs one.

Go read the whole post!

Posted in Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Gun Lust

I love 7.62x51mm/.308 Win for an all-round cartridge. My go-to platform for sending that load down-range is my FAL, which I love.

That being said, while the FAL is much cheaper to own, and parts availability is MUCH better, the FN SCAR-17 is an AMAZING platform:

Its light with GREAT ergonomics. Also I’m a HUGE fan of left-handed charging guns. It takes a bit to get used to when you’ve spent your life pulling the bolt carrier with your right hand, but once you get used to it, it MUCH better IMHO.

Of course the folding/adjustable stock is standard making it illegal in Massachusetts 🙁

Posted in Guns | Leave a comment

Some Joan Peterson Quotes

She’s a bit more talkative than normal. Been tossing out some gems. First you might have read this one in the comments of one of my last posts:

As to the slanted VPC report, you provided me with a link to a paper written by Clayton Cramer, a well know gun right activist and author in support of gun rights. And he is not slanted? Come on Bryan, you can do better than that.

Yep, a well-written paper by Clayton Cramer is biased and should be ignored, while garbage from Joyce is wonderful! Also neat that she’s quick to drop the bias flag (I don’t blame her, if she read the paper it would make her cry!) We can note that Anti-rights people ONLY cite studies, surveys, and papers written by other people who work for the same groups that they do. Their ideology only exists in a pocket of “reality” that they created for themselves.

From the same thread:

The only agenda the Violence Policy Center has to collect data and write reports about gun violence statistics. They are based on real live incidents and shootings. They don’t have a political agenda any more than Clayton Cramer does. He has an agenda. Are you trying to say he doesn’t? So if someone writes on your side of the issue, they have no agenda? I don’t accept that Bryan. The link you sent is one that accepts research from anyone who wants to submit it. The VPC is reporting on shootings of permit holders. If they shoot themselves in a suicide or a homicide/suicide, it doesn’t then count as someone misusing a gun? You are trying to dismiss the fact that permit holders are not all law abiding. You can’t because the facts speak for themselves. It happens that I trust the VPC more than I trust a gun right advocate who has a clear agenda.

LOL!

And from this post:

Of course, people should be trained when they carry guns around. You are aware though, that no training is required to buy a gun. Some states require no training for permit holders. That is a major problem, to say the least. Gun ranges are fine. Who needs “tactical” training as if going to war. That is not necessary. The average gun owner is not going to be in situations that require tactical training. Some of you gun guys imagine yourself in situations like that where you will be fighting against your own government on the streets of America. A makeshift gun range in a residential neighborhood is just plain wrong and dangerous. Find places outside of town. Even those have had problems however. In Texas, there was a shooting of a young boy playing basketball on a school’s playground when a bullet from some guys target shooting in a woods nearby ( in a rural area) hit the boy. In my area, several guys were target shooting in the woods when a bullet from one of their guns flew across a major highway and ended up shooting a little girl on her way into her church. These are totally irresponsible and unacceptable. Guns are inherently dangerous and should be treated with the ultimate respect.Too many gun owners are cavalier about this and don’t practice the rules of safety. If even one life is lost as a result, it is one too many.

Now note she puts scare quotes around “Tactical” because she has NO idea what that means…just that its bad. Also note that shooting in residential areas is bad…and shooting in rural areas is bad. But she doesn’t want to ban guns and shooting…no, not at all!

Thanks Joan, you’re great for a laugh! Keep wasting those Joyce Foundation dollars, soon that well will run dry, and you’ll need to find a REAL job!

Posted in Guns, Politics | Leave a comment

Nice Looking Knife!

Man if I had the extra cash, I’d be buying one of these right now!

Website here

Posted in blades | Leave a comment

Quote of the Day: Bryan

This quote from Bryan Strawser says it all:

I didn’t live in Minnesota when our current carry law was passed in 2003 – but the folks that were heavily involved in getting it passed are quite sure they never said anything like that.

But there does exist good video of some state legislators and our local activist friends talking about “blood in the streets”….

The anti-rights cult likes to point to any violent act by a gun owner who was otherwise lawful as a damnation of every lawful gun owner. They frequently cry some variation of “You said all gun owners would follow the law!”

Of course nobody said this. Its a straw man.

On the other hand its well documented all the instances where the cult claims that relaxing a gun law, will result in “Blood in the streets” “People having gun battles over parking spaces” and “Old West Style Shootouts”.

Of course those statements are demonstrably false!

The core of the anti-freedom ideology is lies!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Podcast | Leave a comment