This Could Be VERY Bad

By way of Tam I find out about a Catholic Confessonal iPhone app.

Worry not, faithful Catholics: The $1.99 application, for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch, is not intended to replace the confessional. Instead, it’s designed to complement the act of confession, offering a “personal examination of conscience” (password-protected, of course) and a step-by-step guide to sin-confessing. The app provides suggested acts of contrition and the “ability to add sins not listed in standard examination of conscience.”

This should be amusing when the Atheist Trolls at 4Chan get wind of this.

Forgive me father for I have sinned. I fucked a pig, and it was my neighbors pig, and he wasn’t watching because he was too busy dealing with the worm I installed on his computer….”

I just hope I hear about it when it happens.

Posted in Random | Leave a comment

Why Should Cows Be Sacred?

Tam has a post up on Kimber Suck and Fail, and the 1911 as it exists today, Caleb also has a good follow-up post.
We should all know I LOVES me some 1911s, I’m carrying one now, and I own two, and I’m sure I’ll get more one day.

Most 1911s made these days are hobby guns. They have ejectors that aren’t pinned, MIM plunger tubes that won’t take a stake, limp noodle cast or MIM extractors that aren’t properly tensioned from the factory, and other failings. These are caused by the fact that the design of the pistol is not friendly to modern manufacturing methods, and so shortcuts get made to keep the guns cost-competitive.

-Tam

But now here comes the heresy part – because aside from nostalgia, there is no reason to buy a 1911 for serious social work any more. With the obvious exception of certain competition divisions such as Single Stack where the 1911 is all that’s allowed.

Again I repeat myself – for a serious fighting or competition pistol, there is absolutely no need to buy a 1911. A good, functioning 1911 that will be reliable is going to cost about $1,000. That’s the price of entry. If you’re in love with the .45 ACP cartridge, for $1,000 you could get TWO M&P45 pistols and a couple of spare mags, or you could get 2 used Glock 19s, a holster, some mag carriers, and a pile of spare mags and even have money left over to take an entry level pistol class.

-Caleb

What they speak is truth. The 1911 is an OLD design and was invented before many modern materials and cost-saving production techniques were invented. Its the way of the world, the classic Luger P08 got replaced by the Walther P38 by the German military simply because it was cheaper and faster to crank out the Walthers than the Lugers, and both guns essentially functioned identically.

Go peek in Officer Friendly’s duty holster, you’ll likely see a polymer framed, double-stack pistol. Why? Its a good design and doesn’t cost a ton to make them and you get a gun comparable, if not better than a modern forged-steel pistol.

My cousin just graduated from College and was looking at pistols for home defense and carry. He sounded a bit reluctant to tell me he was a bit sticker-shy when seeing the price of .45 Ammo (he knows like like the big heavy bullets). I didn’t hesitate, I told him to buy a S&W M&P9c. If he asked me the same question, but said he had a fat signing bonus and money wasn’t an option, I’d have said the same thing.

I must say most people buy 1911s because they LIKE 1911s. I would argue that my S&W1911Sc carry gun. The gun I carry damn near every day, and trust my life, and the lives of my loved ones with, is functionally INFERIOR to say a Kahr TP45 which is approximately the same demotions, weight, caliber, capacity as my lightweight commander, but this gun costs less NEW than I paid for my gun in a well-used state. I’d say “Inferior” also because one of the reasons the Kahr is so much cheaper is its vastly less mechanically complicated. Less parts, less parts to break or fail.

Of course no gun is an island. When I bought my S&W1911Sc I had my pick of holsters, because a 100 year old design means everybody makes a holster for it. I bought some after-market grips, and a new guide rod assembly, and there are a bunch of other things I could easily change on this gun for short money. I can have my pick of magazines (this is a double-edged sword, as I’ve bought lemon magazines for my guns, as well as quality ones, all from “After Market” sources, because I have to, as S&W does not make 1911 magazines, dispute making a ton of 1911s, they simply don’t have to!). Also any gunsmith can do just about any job on a 1911, I wonder how many smiths have spent any serious time in the guts of a Kahr?

Of course there’s the more silly reasons. I own and carry 1911s because that was the first gun I “fell in love with”, shooting was a neat new experience for young anti-gun me, but until I shot my first 1911, it wasn’t something I wanted to do on my own. Because I like 1911s I just so happened to have shot a LOT of them, and done so to high round count (I don’t keep shooting logs, but my stainless 1911 has probably close to 20,000 rounds through it, the Sc considerably less, but probably over 5,000, and that’s just with me, both guns were bought from the used racks), I trust my shooting ability with them more than other guns. Does this mean I couldn’t do the same thing with a Glock? Of course not, but I haven’t.

I’m rambling on. I’ll just say, if you want a 1911, go buy one, and hopefully it’ll treat you well. If you come to me and ask “What gun should I buy. Of course the real answer is “Go shoot a bunch and see what you think!” this isn’t a one-size-fits all world…hell there are some 1911s I don’t like, let alone guns of various shapes and sizes. But my most favorite gun to shoot, own, and carry won’t be on the top of the list if you asked me to give you a short-list.

Caleb and Tam are right, NIB a quality 1911 is gonna run around $1000. If you’re a new shooter, you’d be better off buying a gun for half that price and dumping the rest in mags, ammo, holsters, and training. Then once you’ve become a competent shooter with your new-fangled plastic pistol, you still want an old-timey 1911, go get one and shoot the crap out of it!

Posted in Guns | Leave a comment

Caveat Emptor

Got some mixed feelings about this one.

The 86-year old man who lives in the Amesbury, Massachusetts house didn’t want to talk with us on camera — embarrassed, nervous after police say he paid an area contractor 48 hundred dollars to clear snow from his roof on Friday….Amesbury police say 47 year old Kevin Snow, Senior and his sons 23 year old Kevin Jr. and 20 year old George Snow approached the elderly man and offered to do the roof. Police say the man agreed to the 4,800 dollar price tag, the work was done and he paid the bill, but when his daughter found out about it, she called police saying he’d been scammed. Not addressing this specific case, but talking about people taking advantage of the elderly, Amesbury Crime Prevention Officer Thomas Hanshaw said, “It’s sad, it really is.”

The text above is transcribed from a video I can’t figgure out how to embed here.

Watch the video and you’ll see REALLY where I have my issues. The guy is a jerk and is running a scam, and it seems that’s his deal.

The Snows are known to authorities throughout the area– in fact — across the country for allegedly preying on elderly people, charging them exorbitant prices for snow removal, paving and consruction jobs. Officials in california called the family one of the most notorious traveling con artists they’d seen after the sons and a cousin from Ct pleaded no contest to charges of grand theft in 2009 for allegedly bilking at least a dozen people out of thousands of dollars for paving jobs.

Look there’s pretty obvious malice, and it seems they target elderly people who might not be thinking as clearly because people in their prime don’t want to play their games.

Still as much of an asshole as they are, it isn’t a crime to be an asshole, otherwise the jails would be full and my morning drive would be much more pleasant. They quoted a price for services, the services were rendered, and the agreed price was paid. Frankly If the old man had only paid them $500 for services rendered (a generous amount for the job at hand) the SNOWS would have a pretty decent court case for breech of contract.

Also I’m curious if there is some law I’m unaware of that makes it a crime to overcharge on a product even if all information is up-front. If So I might launch a class-action lawsuit against H&K for charging so much for their handguns when other producers offer a virtually identical product for about half the price…and I personally wouldn’t say quality is an issue.

OK back on a serious note, we don’t need to lock up our seniors, but if you’re caring for a Senior who is failing in health you need to look out for their well-being. If their reflexes and judgment is failing TAKE AWAY THEIR KEYS! You don’t need them killing themselves or other people in the frighteningly common news story of allegedly “confusing the gas with the brake”.

Let them know they shouldn’t be pressured into binding contracts, and they should likely sleep on a decision, and contact their caregiver, or a lawyer before proceeding. If they feel pressured to act immediately that’s probably as good a reason to NOT partake as any other out there.

Posted in Freedom, Random | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Hammer Time

One often wonders about the easy availability of Assault Weapons.

ST. PAUL, Minn. – A Mendota Heights man is facing multiple felony charges after used a hammer to smash in car windows outside a St. Paul bar before hurling it at a peace officer, according to court documents.

According to the criminal complaint, Inver Grove police officers responded to a parking lot on Jan. 29 after receiving reports that a man was smashing in car windows and damaging vehicles with a hammer.

A hammer is only good for murder and mayhem and they should be banned! You cannot hunt with a hammer!

h/t MaddMedic

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

One More

Joan is just too pin-headed to not point out her reasoning difficulties.

Yeah- Anthony- that just doesn’t work for me. There’s a difference between alcohol and having alcohol and a gun at a frat party. Lots of bad things happen at frat parties when alcohol is consumed. But adding a gun to the mix can result in death. Frat parties have been going on for decades as well as drinking at frat parties. But allowing legally owned guns has not been in the mix. Why people want guns in the mix is totally beyond me and beyond reason, actually.

Odd, I went to school just North of Bangor Maine. This also happens to be the location where I made my transition from Anti-Gun, to Pro-Gun. Now when I went the Fraternity houses were designated “Gun Free Zones”, but historically that wasn’t always the case. One of the Fraternities I used to frequent for parties (I was never a member of any, but I was social with many) was founded as the fraternity for outdoorsmen. Used to be there was an armory in the basement, and I’m sure there were rifles and shotguns tucked in closets and under beds. Hell anybody my parent’s age remember kids taking guns to school so they could go hunting after class, or to participate in the school rifle or pistol team. Not only were there drinking parties there, but for some of that time the drinking age was 18!

I will say that I met more hunters and shooters in college than I had ever known before in my life at the time (That number has only increased), I drank at off-campus parties where the host owned guns, I’m sure those houses with guns was even greater than I was aware of.

I also know people who were hospitalized for Alcohol poisoning. One fraternity house on campus had a death when a drunk person fell off a balcony. Alcohol poisoning deaths, and drunk driving deaths are not uncommon things. Again Joan is painting a world we all know and live in differently. We all went to parties, we’re all aware of the risks accepted with this, and have seen people who made bad choices die. Joan is attempting to say that guns are the only relevant risk. We know this to be false.

“Why people want guns in the mix is totally beyond me and beyond reason, actually.” I wonder.

Be safe!

Posted in Freedom, Guns | Leave a comment

“Gun Death?” Quote of the Day

Reality brings out the CAPSLOCK RAGE

Yadayadayada- we have gone over this so many times that it hardly bears repeating but here goes again- I AM TALKING ABOUT GUN DEATHS AND INJURIES ON THIS BLOG AND NOT OVERALL CRIME RATES. THE TWO ARE DIFFERENT COMPARISONS. I KNOW YOU DON’T WANT ME TO BE TALKING ABOUT THE CARNAGE BY GUNS BUT THAT IS WHAT I AM DOING. DIVERTING ATTENTION AWAY FROM GUNS TO OVERALL CRIME IS A TACTIC BUT IT DOESN’T CHANGE THE FACTS. GET OVER IT. I WILL CONTINUE BLOGGING ABOUT GUN DEATHS AND INJURIES ON THIS BLOG.

Diverting attention away from “Gun Death” to “Death” and “Gun Violence” to “Violence” is a tactic. Its called clarifying the issue. Does a soldier keep his head down in a firefight because he doesn’t want to get shot, or because he doesn’t want to get killed? Also I have several friends who served in Iraq and what they say they feared most were the roadside bombs. If a police officer arrests somebody and finds a pocket knife on them, does he ignore that because it isn’t a gun?

We divert attention away from artificially narrow fields. When Linoge published his three graphical analysis of guns and crime in America Here, Here and Here. He was not “Diverting attention AWAY from guns” but simply expanding the field to include all the relevant data points. You see, a person beaten with a baseball bat, or strangled with an extension cord, is just as dead, and just as tragic as somebody shot. We’re not diverting attention, we’re simply accepting that guns are only one way for somebody to be injured or killed.

What’s really getting Joan a’Shreakin’ is that “Gun Death” is being exposed as a ruse to confuse the issue, and to make gun control look more relevant. They want people to get the twisted view that somehow getting shot is the only way to die, and if we can just ban those pesky guns, the world would be a safer place. Only that’s just not true. I’ll end with a quote from one of Joan’s Coworkers.

I am not arguing here that higher rates of gun ownership cause higher rates of crime, violent crime, or homicide. Such causation is difficult to show because so many other factors bear on the incidence of crime. For instance, simple cross-national comparisons of gun availability and crime do not control for the degree to which various countries impose legal restrictions on firearms. It also is difficult to sort out whether high levels of gun ownership lead to high crime rates or whiter high crime rates lead to high levels of gun ownership.

Dennis A. Henigan: Brady Campaign

They know “Gun Death” isn’t a relevant metric, and by its very nature it is not a number that’s relevant to the risk assessment of normal people in their day-to-day lives. We all understand that guns are dangerous, and guns in the hands of bad people are EXTREMELY dangerous, but when a bad person attempts to kill you with a knife, or a pipe, the fear isn’t less because he isn’t armed with a gun.

My goals are to reduce ALL violence as much as possible. I’m a realist, as I’ve seen evidence of some of the first humans to walk the Earth committing violent acts, and I’ve seen animals kill each-other, we can never reduce violence and murder to zero. I’ve also spent a lot of time pointing out that if you remove tools for violence from society, violent people will use new tools. The UK banned guns to stop “Gun Violence”, now they’re banning knives to stop “Knife Violence”, one can see the futility of this given that a “Club” is a deadly weapon, and is nothing more than a tree branch, or a rock, or a piece of building materiel of appropriate size and weight, and certainly these heavy restrictions on freedom have not made the UK any safer than it was before.

Violent crime is a factor of violent criminals, not tools. I speak for reducing violent criminals by punishing them more severely. Settling differences without violence is easy, therefore we should have no mercy on those who choose violence over more civil methods.
This punishment must be done under rule of law with law enforcement and the judicial system. Still even a well funded Police force, generally the cops are (as the old adage goes) Minuets away, when mere seconds count. So I am in full support of arming good people. By definition these are not the criminals, they are not bullies, they are not thugs. They don’t want arms to CAUSE violence, but to RESPOND to it, legally, and preventativly.

These are my goals. Now what sounds more like Common Sense, to you?

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Quote of the Day: Sean

Sean over at Days of Our Trailers

This blogging thing has made me question a few of the decisions in my life. I’m happy with my job, but I’ve kind of wondered if I shouldn’t have gotten into developing laundry detergent as a profession. I could make a killing selling these guys laundry soap specifically for their underwear.

I woke up kinda grouchy this morning, I needed a LOL!

Posted in Random | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” a Lost Father

Alpheus sent me a link to this blog post discussing the death of his father.

Two weeks ago today, my father passed away. He fell down a stairway while trying to bring his laundry up the stairs, and hit his head on the landing below. About four years ago, my dad had a stroke, and so he was on blood thinners, to prevent other strokes. Because of those blood thinners, surgeons were unable to control the bleeding in his brain, and he was declared brain dead the next day.

That’s just awful, and my heart goes out to you man. An Ex Girlfriend of mine lost her father in a similar way. He was cleaning gutters on a ladder and fell and hit his head.

I appreciate you sharing your painful story with the world, and know that things will get better, but also will never be quite the same. You and your family are in our thoughts.

Alpheus, also mentioned that falling down the stairs does indeed count as a “Gun Death?” you see if his father had had a negligent discharge rather than falling while trying to negotiate stairs with a load of laundry that would be a “Gun Death” and the anti-rights jerks would wallow in that blood. I guess Alpheus can take some comfort that his father’s blood will be safe from the feet of the pro-ignorance, anti-freedom crowd.

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

Doing the Right Thing

I just donated some cash to Dick Heller’s foundation. I think its a good cause. Just thought I’d share.

Posted in Freedom, Guns | Leave a comment

Quote of the Day, Chris

Chris from Alaska over at Joe’s place

As a hunter, I don’t particularly care for detachable magazines for most of my hunting arms. In fact fixed magazines are probably better for a bunch of reasons on a big game rifle. Still, companies insist on selling hunting rifles with detachable mags, sometimes without even offering a fixed version (like my XBolt). Some of that is driven by consumer preference (American civilian markets have emulated common military and police trends forever, and detachable mag rifles have been “in” for a long time). But a lot of it has to do with gun safety laws that require the rifles to be loaded and unloaded frequently. If you live in a place with lots of places that require you to handle the gun frequently and take all the ammo in and out of the rifle frequently then a detachable mag is a lot more convenient than a fixed one (or even a hinged floorplate). Yet another case of unintended consequences — without some of these gun laws there would likely be even fewer detachable mag rifles out there…

Yep, magazines are failure points, and the less complicated the magazine the less prone to failure. But gun laws promote answers to problems nobody had. I have an old Remington 722 which is the predecessor to the extremely popular Remington 700. The 722 has a fixed box magazine, and a two-position safety. When the gun is on “Safe” the gun is locked up solid. Trigger is disconnected, and the bolt is locked in place. This is ideal for hunters as you don’t want your trigger getting pulled when crawling through brush, but you also don’t want your bolt opened and you ammo spilled. The 700 (at least the more modern offerings) has a 3-position safety so the trigger can still be disconnected, but the action free to swing, and a detachable magazine, these are just for easily unloading the gun, and as Chris says in compliance with hunting laws.

The antis love to talk about how I should give up my handguns for a shotgun. Now I will admit shotguns have superior short-range ballistics to handguns. But I actually don’t use a shotgun as my preferred home defense arm because #1. Its not convenient for me to carry my shotgun around with me at home. #2. My Mossberg 590, for all its evil features has a fixed magazine.

I of course COULD appease the antis and replace my handgun with shotguns with removable magazines, and get over the portability issue by simply stashing one on every floor of my house.

Would that make you antis feel better, or worse?

Oh and I’m not sure if you guys who live in free states, but the AWB restricts pistol and rifle magazines to 10-rounds…but shotgun magazines to FIVE! The only reason for this was just picking a random number that was common in the industry so as not to gore the hunter’s ox. Most pump shotguns hold 5, so that was the magic line in the sand. I’m sure if they were gaining ground they’d make like Australia and ban pump-guns the same as semi-autos.

Posted in Freedom, Guns | Leave a comment