How Gun Control Works: International

Heard this story on the news this morning and I knew it needed to get on the blog:

A man wielding a machete and a hammer is holding 30 pre-school children and teachers hostage at a kindergarten in Malaysia, police said.

Yep, but here’s the money quote right here:

It is believed he told negotiators to give him a gun or he would kill the children.

Yep, Gun control, works GOOD! So the antis will mention that maybe if he had access to a gun he might have killed somebody before the police tear gassed this guy (and the kids and teachers I might add). Well I wonder what he might want to do with the gun. I suspect if he had a heater he might have shot at the voices inside his head first.

All I gotta say is if you’re in a school filled with children and teachers and you have a hammer and a machete, you think you’d do LESS damage than you would if you had a gun and murder on your mind?

Still this isn’t “Gun Violence” so the antis will look the other way, unless they want to focus on the request for a gun.

Gun control, works REAL GOOD!

Posted in Freedom, Gun Death?, Politics | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Scalding

You know what the most common weapon on the planet is? Water!

A northwest Houston man was clinging to life at the hospital Thursday, almost a week after authorities said his teenage girlfriend scalded him with boiling water.

Simple as that, the most common chemical on earth and she used it to quite possibly murder her boyfriend.

You wanna ban water?

Bonus found a video:

h/t Whipped Cream Difficulties

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

More from Harry Brown

Just to expand on the points of the Harry Brown review Kevin gave me a link to this interview. A Money quote is this:

Michael Caine: It was scary because I didn’t realize quite how dangerous it all was. There, now, instead of alcohol and a fist fight and getting a broken nose, now you’ll get shot or knifed. You have people that have no idea what they are doing because they are so drugged up to their eyeballs, and you could say they’d never do that, but of course they do because you don’t know they’re high. It was extremely dangerous. One of the minor, silly things is that we would do daylight shots with dialogue, and it became a nuisance because every time we shot a shot there was a police siren. All day long, in the daylight on a sunny Wednesday afternoon, we kept having to reshoot.

Odd, I thought MASSIVE gun control and granting the moon and the stars to police as powers over individual rights made people safer.

Its almost like the progress “Progressives” talk about is the world of Harry Brown.

Thanks, I’ll live my life in a movie that’s too fucking boring for anybody put to film! Massachusetts is bad, but at least it isn’t London bad!

Posted in Guns, Movies, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Video On Acceptable Bigotry

Great little video from Dan Savage. Overall I LOVE his podcast, hate his politics, but as you can imagine we do see eye to eye on the sex and drugs issues.

Also I do appreciate his honesty, so many people (on both political sides) are willing to look the other way on a politicians horrible acts if its THEIR politician.

Still he talks about people on the wrong side of history such as the not-so-far-away time when it was OK to discriminate against black people simply because of their skin color. In some effect gun owners and gays are kinda the same way. Angry bigots want us to stop what we have no desire to stop. They want gays to quit being gays, and those who take control of their own personal defense to go back to being sheep. (And I would add that the two are not mutually exclusive…tho we do need more representation in the gay community. Seriously, armed gays don’t get bashed, and if some violent homophobes get shot in the process where’s the loss?)

It takes a LOT of hard work to end such wrong-minded behavior, and its something every cause must strive for.

Posted in Freedom, Podcast, Politics | Leave a comment

Casey Anthony

On Casey Anthony, I don’t care. Its a show trial on a bunch of fucked up people who likely killed a little girl.

Haven’t followed the details, don’t want to, can’t make me. Maybe she’s innocent, maybe she’s guilty. Most likely they picked some of the dumbest people around to serve on the jury. Shit like this happens all the time in every state. Sorry this is nothing new.

Posted in Bad Justice | Leave a comment

More Love Needed

Not for me, we’re doing OK. Go over to Bob’s his Mom isn’t doing so hot.

Best wishes, thoughts, prayers and love all around guys. This sort of stuff is no fun at all. 🙁

Posted in Family and Friends | Leave a comment

Bullshit! **UPDATED**

John has a great rundown on the new San Francisco carry law. Go read the whole thing. Here’s the bottom line:

The cost for the permit, the fingerprinting, the psychological test, and the firearms testing and qualification test is $2,607 for first time applicants and there is no refund of any of it if they deny you anywhere in the process.

I don’t think I dropped 2 grand on my first gun total kit including all the Massachusetts permitting hoops, as well as my club membership as well as first-time member dues, a used 1911, cleaning kit, safety gear and a half-case of cheap .45 ACP ammo…tho it was a bit close as I do the math in my head.

Furthermore its restricted to guns by certain manufacturers, no cocked-and-locked carry (seriously? Idiots!) and the guns MUST be in .45 ACP, .40 S&W, 9x19mm, or .38 Special. So that can close a LOT of doors. No .380 Auto pocket guns, no 1911s, nothing by certain companies that make more affordable guns like Bersa, or Charter Arms, or Kel-Tec. They have the dumb restrictions on what GLOCK trigger pack you must use (but say nothing about say a Kahr or S&W or XD trigger….tho I wonder if they consider guns like the Walther PPS or the Springfield XD “Cocked and Locked” guns).

Further for the range qualification the qual needs to be done on EACH of the guns you want to carry with. So if for me my S&W1911Sc is verboten so I’d have to switch to a Kahr TP45, and I’d also have to re-qualify with my S&W642. No word if say Jay’s Snubbie would be out because its chambered in .357 Magnum, or if he’d just be required to stoke the charge-holes with .38s…same could be said about the Ruger SP101 which is a nice little carry gun, but its a .357, can you carry it with .38s or do you need to get a gun that can only feed .38s?) Also I’ve occasionally carried my wifes S&W638, its a different gun that the 642, but only in the hammer style, and frankly in running of the gun the two are identical, would I need to run the course again?

Furthermore they make you shoot on the SF LE Silhouette target which by this catalogue measures 33″ tall and 18″ wide, and they make you reach out to 25 yards. How many defensive pistol shootings happen at 25 yards? I’m sure there are a few out there, but honestly I’m betting those instances are at hens teeth level of rarity, even if you open up the sample to include law enforcement shootings.

Another thing I noticed was they talk about a “Snapped or locked holster”, meaning they further require your holster to have a retention device. Not sure if the holster also needs to be on the qualifier, certainly the DeSantis Nemesis I carry my J-Frame in won’t count for the test, so my pocket carry might be illegal, or at least I’d need to buy some sort of retention holster JUST to qualify the gun. I’ll also note that I carry my 1911 in a Glaco Miami Classic II shoulder holster which does have a thumb-break strap on it, but I can’t get that rig for the TP45, not sure if anybody makes a good shoulder rig for the TP45…

Not sure what costs are one-time-only, and what must be forked over for each running of the test. But let’s drop the $2600 for a one-time permit issuance, then factor in a $50 Retention holster, and $600 for a TP45, or similar qualifying gun, we’re looking at $3250, and that’s NOT counting club membership or range fees, as well as ammo, safety gear, cleaning kits, storage devices et al, and You aren’t going to be able to drive from the gun shop to the range and expect to score many hits on target drawing from a retention holster at 25 yards.

John’s point is correct, they’re being forced by the courts to allow for Carry permits for residents dumb enough to live in San Francisco, so they made a system so onerous and expensive only the most wealthy and dedicated shooters will even BOTHER to START the process let alone complete it. Furthermore what if you’re a shooter of modest experience and you’ve decided you want to start carrying in San Francisco, you log your range time and take your classes et al, but when you get to the range on test day you get a case of the jitters and score a few misses at the 25 yard target. Try again, buddy and put another dollar in! Maybe you’re now tapped out in cash because you just blew your emergency rent money on the course and gun, or maybe you just give up.

That’s the point. Meanwhile in AMERICA people can live in states where permits aren’t required for carry (some for all carry, others for open carry only) furthermore there are plenty of states who just want to see an application and a check for their troubles, and don’t require you to do any mandatory training. In all these places there are NO statistical differences between states that do this anal-probe bullshit to all applicants.

Furthermore does the SFPD have to run a course of fire like this, and are they restricted to only guns on that list? Are you telling me there are no detectives that carry a pocket .380 in a pocket holster or a deep concealment holster without retention? Not that qualifications matter to SFPD.

San Francisco is PUNISHING you for wanting to exercise your 2nd Amendment rights. Remember that!

**UPDATE** Have a look at this comment from Brandon Combs of Calguns, he gives the breakdown of the fees. Like the Qualification test that costs $1,722, and that does NOT include ammo fees! Still more egregious is “Psychological assessment” and “$1Million insurance”. Disgusting.

Furthermore this is for a ONE YEAR permit! It seems they’re playing the same game Massachusetts does with their non-resident permits. Here in Mass you can’t get a carry permit if you live in some towns, you can in others. If you live out of state tho, the permitting system is essentially “Shall Issue” (the same “May issue” rules apply but when the issuing body is the Massachusetts state police they don’t bother to harass the lawful) still the permit needs to be applied for in person in Chelsea Mass which is not one of the best areas of the state, requires the same training class, $100 fee, and photographing and fingerprinting, and it is good for ONE YEAR!

For those of you who carry think of how many non-resident permits you have. Now think of how it would change the way you live and carry if they needed to be applied for and renewed in person, and were only valid for 1 year.

Needless to say Mass has VERY few Non-resident permit holders. That’s the whole point!

Posted in Guns, Politics, Safety, Self Defense | Leave a comment

Sweet!

Was sitting in the doctor’s office after getting my shot (I’m required to stick around for a half hour after the injection to make sure I don’t catch an acute case of death), and I felt a powerful hankering for some oldschool text adventures. What did I find?

Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy

Yeah, that’s EXACTLY what I needed!

Posted in Games | Leave a comment

“Gun Death” Stabbing

A simplebut to the point one.

Coroner Vicki DeGeus-Morris tells the Idaho Press-Tribune that Jaremy Allen McCane died in the front yard of a residence early Saturday after being stabbed at least once.

Give somebody a piece of steel and a rock and they can build a primitive knife in almost no time. Of course you can make knives out of stone, or other materials too.

Think restricting tools will accomplish ANYTHING?

h/t Barron

Posted in Gun Death? | Leave a comment

How Gun Control Works Pt II

So I’m going to expand on this post I wrote this morning.

The anti-rights people are always saying when we roll back some of their miserable and illegal laws that there will be “blood in the streets”. Well there is blood in the streets…only its the streets with the most gun control and gang presence.

Of course the anti-rights zealots, not to allow facts to dominate the discussion quickly point out that every anti-gun state has a nearby state that has less restrictive laws, and if only we could just enact laws in THOSE states then we could curb “Gun Death”.

Well first it doesn’t make a lick of sense, as if the violent criminals are going into New Hampshire to buy “less restricted” guns to bring back to Boston…why don’t they commit crimes in New Hampshire too? I mean they’re THERE, and people in New Hampshire have money and valuable stuff, right? Actually they probably have MORE money because they aren’t taxed every time they blink like those of us behind the “Progressive” Iron Curtain.

Well it doesn’t make sense because it isn’t true! (PDF…and thanks Wally for sending this to me!)

So Scroll to page 6. Look where the guns come from. The vast majority of guns found at crimes, or on criminals in Massachusetts come from….MASSACHUSETTS!

But the anti-rights fools will whine further and point out that the other states add up too! Well they kinda don’t when you look at the percentage that Gun-Control Haven, Massachusetts supplies, still I’ll bite. Scroll to page 7.

Time-to-crime. Look at that spike at the end. “Over 3 Years”. If criminals are buying guns from corrupt dealers or straw sales, why would they sit on the gun for 3 years?

Easy they don’t. The guns are mostly stolen from lawful people. You can’t stop that. If Thieves can get passed a guarded secured museum to steal priceless art, how will you ensure your gun will NEVER be stolen? You can’t.

One last amusing tid-bit. Look at where the guns are recovered on page 8, and cross-reference it with this list of how restricted the towns are.

Gun control, not only does it not work, it causes EXACTLY what it aims to prevent.

If you like violent crime, you LOVE gun control!

Posted in Freedom, Guns, Safety | Leave a comment