So Joan Peterson of the Joyce Foundation and the Brady Campaign linked this article by Time. Go read the whole thing as its interesting. But the overall message is studies show that if a person is given a choice to kill a person to save 5 others they would choose to do that.
It ties well into the gun debate because that is a potential situation when you keep and bear arms. You might be in a situation where somebody or many somebodies could be killed unless you kill the aggressor.
I would go a step further, I see nothing morally wrong with shooting a person committing a violent crime that risks an innocent life. Its something I’d rather NOT do, but if the choice is shoot somebody doing something horrible and morally wrong or allow them to seriously harm or kill another person (we won’t even factor in multiple people) I would question anybody who would make any choice but to kill the aggressor.
And of course there’s factoring in, say somebody willing to rob you with deadly force. They may kill you even if you comply, and do you think this will be their last armed robbery?
So even a single-victim event could still spare the lives of many more people down the road.
And now to the messenger, Ms. Joan Peterson, who would like to make sure we don’t have that choice and the innocent people die.
These are not good people.