Weer'd World

I was just pointed to a Sci-Show I missed when I was out of town last year:

First up I’ll note that Hank’s drank the “Climate Change” Kool-Aid (or whatever name the Cult is calling it now), so he’s shown to be swayed by junk science outside of his comfort zone.

That being said he leads with the studies on the AWB and Concealed carry that show inconclusive results.

If you’re an Authoritarian, “Inconclusive” means the government should keep that power.

If You’re a “Progressive” then an “Inconclusive” law is progress and should be embraced!

If you’re a Conservative then an “Inconclusive” law was a mistake and should be repealed

If you’re a libertarian then even CONCLUSIVE laws with a low impact on society should be repealed!

I think Hank leans towards the top two, while I lean well towards the bottom. Honestly we’re talking opinion on all of those. I don’t agree with him, but at this juncture I’m man enough to admit we can BOTH be wrong.

Then he gets roped hard. He essentially cites the Branas study, and a Joyce extension of Kellerman, both we recently discussed here. These studies were intentionally misleading by conflating lawful gun owners with criminals in illegal possession of guns engaging in criminal acts.

I certainly suspect that Hank leans to the authoritarian and “progressive”, but overall I think he was simply mislead by the creative writings by the cult of anti-rights.

Remember this?

Elliot Fineman “Organized” a boycott of Starbucks, demanding Starbucks embraces an anti-gun policy. Notice in the interview Elliot makes claims that the anti-rights cult is so big that they will do severe damage to both the Starbucks corporation, and their shareholders. What was most amusing about it was how desperate and ineffective it was. It wasn’t legislation, and it wasn’t legal policy. So if Starbucks posted “No Guns” signs it A) Would only effect people carrying guns actually IN Starbucks stores, and B) Would only LEGALLY effect people in states where binding signage was law.

Then they “Implemented” the “Boycott”….well Miguel has the laughable results.

So a national boycott that would have had little impact on lawful gun owners failed miserably. Next course of action? DO IT AGAIN!!! But don’t make it so HARD!

So a national boycott that allegedly was indefinite until their demands were met did nothing, but hey just ONE SATURDAY, That’ll work!

They keep claiming they have a “Majority” and such actions will somehow be noticed. Yet National Legislation has been bust, and even their rallies are tiny:

They’ll just keep lowering the bar until they can claim victory!!